Abstract
The recent advent of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has had a significant impact in the field of prenatal testing. Although reports on pregnant women who used NIPT have accumulated, little is known about the experiences of their male partners. In this study, we assessed the experiences of couples who were expecting a child and undergoing NIPT, with a focus on both the pregnant women and their partners. Questionnaires were administered to 282 participants focusing on their specific experiences at three time points: after pre-test counseling (first visit), when undergoing NIPT (second visit), and when results were received (third visit). Responses were analyzed to assess the differences between pregnant women and their partners. We found that more partners selected “family” as their first information source about NIPT and “my partner” as the first person to request NIPT than did pregnant women (35.6 vs. 5.9 %; p < 0.001 and 19.3 vs.1.5 %; p < 0.001). However, pregnant women more often consulted others including family and friends until undergoing NIPT than their partners (89.1 vs. 54.6 %; p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that it is important to encourage male partners to be actively involved in the NIPT decision-making process. Differences between pregnant women and their partners should be seriously considered when providing genetic counseling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, E., Kelly, S., & Kerzin-Storrar, L. (2015). Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors’ experiences and perspectives. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 300–311.
Allyse, M., Minear, M. A., Berson, E., Sridhar, S., Rote, M., Hung, A., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2015). Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges. International Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 113–126.
Buchanan, A., Sachs, A., Toler, T., & Tsipis, J. (2014). NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 850–857.
Cederholm, M., Axelsson, O., & Sjödén, P. O. (1999). Women’s knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14, 267–272.
Deans, Z., Hill, M., Chitty, L. S., & Lewis, C. (2013). Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 713–718.
Devers, P. L., Cronister, A., Ormond, K. E., Facio, F., Brasington, C. K., & Flodman, P. (2013). Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 291–295.
Dheensa, S., Metcalfe, A., & Williams, R. A. (2013). Men’s experiences of antenatal screening: a metasynthesis of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 121–133.
Dondorp, W., de Wert, G., Bombard, Y., Bianchi, D. W., Bergmann, C., Borry, P., Chitty, L. S., et al. (2015). Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Summary and recommendations. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23, 1438–1450.
Draper, J. (2002). “It”s the first scientific evidence’: men’s experience of pregnancy confirmation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 563–570.
Hillman, S. C., Skelton, J., Quinlan-Jones, E., Wilson, A., & Kilby, M. D. (2013). “If it helps…” the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A, 1619–1627.
Horsting, J. M. H., Dlouhy, S. R., Hanson, K., Quaid, K., Bai, S., & Hines, K. A. (2014). Genetic counselors’ experience with cell-free fetal DNA testing as a prenatal screening option for aneuploidy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 377–400.
Jaques, A. M., Bell, R. J., Watson, L., & Halliday, J. L. (2004). People who influence women’s decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 44, 233–238.
Kenen, R., Smith, A. C. M., Watkins, C., & Zuber-Pittore, C. (2000). To use or not to use: male partners’ perspectives on decision making about prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 33–45.
Lo, Y. M., Corbetta, N., Chamberlain, P. F., Rai, V., Sargent, I. L., Redman, C. W., & Wainscoat, J. S. (1997). Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet, 350, 485–487.
Locock, L., & Alexander, J. (2006). “Just a bystander”? Men’s place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1349–1359.
Manegold-Brauer, G., Kang Bellin, A., Hahn, S., De Geyter, C., Buechel, J., Hoesli, I., & Lapaire, O. (2014). A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland. Swiss Medical Weekly, 144, w13915.
Markens, S., Browner, C. H., & Preloran, H. M. (2003). “I’m not the one they’re sticking the needle into” Latino couples, fetal diagnosis, and the discourse of reproductive rights. Gender and Society, 17, 462–481.
Murakami, K., Tsujino, K., Sase, M., Nakata, M., Ito, M., & Kutsunugi, S. (2012). Japanese women’s attitudes towards routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy. Nursing & Health Sciences, 14, 95–101.
Nishiyama, M., Sawai, H., & Kosugi, S. (2013). The current state of genetic counseling before and after amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in Japan: a survey of obstetric hospital clients of a prenatal testing laboratory. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 795–804.
Palomaki, G. E., Kloza, E. M., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Haddow, J. E., Neveux, L. M., Ehrich, M., van den Boom, D., et al. (2011). DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 913–920.
Palomaki, G. E., Deciu, C., Kloza, E. M., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Haddow, J. E., Neveux, L. M., Ehrich, M., et al. (2012). DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 296–305.
Reed, K. (2009). ‘It’s them faulty genes again’: women, men and the gendered nature of genetic responsibility in prenatal blood screening. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 343–359.
Sago, H., & Sekizawa, A. (2015). Nationwide demonstration project of next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma in Japan: 1-year experience. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 331–336.
Sasaki, A., Sawai, H., Masuzaki, H., Hirahara, F., & Sago, H. (2011). Low prevalence of genetic prenatal diagnosis in Japan. Prenatal Diagnosis, 31, 1007–1009.
Suzumori, N., Ebara, T., Kumagai, K., Goto, S., Yamada, Y., Kamijima, M., & Sugiura-Ogasawara, M. (2014). Non-specific psychological distress in women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing because of advanced maternal age. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 1055–1060.
Taylor, J. B., Chock, V. Y., & Hudgins, L. (2014). NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 72–78.
Warsof, S. L., Larion, S., & Abuhamad, A. Z. (2015). Overview of the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35, 972–979.
Williams, R. A., Dheensa, S., & Metcalfe, A. (2011). Men’s involvement in antenatal screening: a qualitative pilot study using e-mail. Midwifery, 27, 861–866.
Acknowledgments
We thank Y. Akizawa, E. Kondo, and M. Tsubata for support and advice; and B. Barfod and A. Holmes for critically reading the manuscript. Part of this work was carried out by a TWMU Grant-in-Aid for clinical research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Motoko Watanabe, Mari Matsuo, Masaki Ogawa, Toshitaka Uchiyama, Satoru Shimizu, Naoko Iwasaki, Akemi Yamauchi, Mari Urano, Hironao Numabe, and Kayoko Saito declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before inclusion in the study.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, M., Matsuo, M., Ogawa, M. et al. Genetic Counseling for Couples Seeking Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Japan: Experiences of Pregnant Women and their Partners. J Genet Counsel 26, 628–639 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0038-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0038-7