Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Strength at Home” Group Intervention for Military Populations Engaging in Intimate Partner Violence: Pilot Findings

  • RESEARCH AND INTERVENTIONS FOR VICTIMS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this brief report, we present information on the Strength at Home intervention to treat male active duty or military veteran perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) as well as preliminary pilot study findings. Strength at Home is a 12-session cognitive-behavioral group intervention developed by the authors that is based on a social information processing model of IPV perpetration. Six men referred to two intervention groups and five collateral female partners participated in this pilot study. Findings indicated large reductions for most indices of physical and psychological IPV from pre-treatment to 6-month follow-up. These initial results are promising though the small sample size and other study limitations preclude our ability to draw firm conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1997). Comparing the responses of maritally violent and nonviolent spouses to problematic marital and nonmarital situations: Are the skill deficits of physically aggressive husbands and wives global? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 301–313. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., et al. (1995). The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75–90. doi:10.1002/jts.2490080106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, E., Corral, S., & Estévez, A. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1072–1087. doi:10.1177/1077801207305933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chemtob, C. M., Novaco, R. W., Hamada, R. S., Gross, D. M., & Smith, G. (1997). Anger regulation deficits in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 17–36. doi:10.1023/A:1024852228908.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., et al. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 260–268. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constans, J. I. (2005). Information-processing biases in PTSD. In J. J. Vasterling & C. R. Brewin (Eds.), Neuropsychology of PTSD: Biological, cognitive, and clinical perspectives (pp. 105–130). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468–476. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, C. I. (2011). Intimate partner violence: Cognitive, affective, and relational factors. In J. P. Forgas, A. W. Kruglanski, K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, A. W. Kruglanski, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The psychology of social conflict and aggression (pp. 167–184). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A., & Davison, G. C. (1998). Articulated thoughts of maritally violent and nonviolent men during anger arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 259–269. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, C. I., & Jamison, T. (2002). Articulated thoughts of male dating violence perpetrators during anger arousal. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 289–308. doi:10.1023/A:101604522618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foran, H. M., Slep, A. M., & Heyman, R. E. (2011). Prevalences of intimate partner violence in a representative U.S. Air Force sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 391–397. doi:10.1037/a0022962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. E., & Neidig, P. H. (1999). A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. army and civilian representative samples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 239–242. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992). Social skill deficits in maritally violent men: Interpreting the data using a social information processing model. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 605–617. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(92)90134-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Heyman, R. E., & O’Leary, K. D. (1995). Correspondence between telephone and written assessments of physical violence in marriage. Behavior Therapy, 26, 671–680. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80038-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C. T. (2005). Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862–876. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meis, L. A., Barry, R. A., Kehle, S. M., Erbes, C. R., & Polusny, M. A. (2010). Relationship adjustment, PTSD symptoms, and treatment utilization among coupled National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 560–567. doi:10.1037/a0020925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R. F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P. A., et al. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship?: A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9, 47–56. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14, 39–53. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/vav.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., Hoover, S., & Taft, C. (1999). The multidimensional measure of emotional abuse: Factor structure and subscale validity. Toronto, Canada: Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaco, R. W., & Chemtob, C. M. (1998). Anger and trauma: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. In V. M. Follette, J. I. Ruzek, & F. R. Abueg (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral therapies for trauma (pp. 162–190). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschmann, J. K., Patterson, J. C., & Schofield, G. (1990). A retrospective study of marital discord in pilots: The USAFSAM experience. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 61, 1145–1148. Retrieved from http://www.asma.org/publications/asem-journal.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22–33. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrist.com/default2.asp#.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., King, L. A., Dedeyn, J. M., & Musser, P. H. (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology among partners of men in treatment for relationship abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 259–268. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. T., O’Farrell, T. J., Doron-LaMarca, S., Panuzio, J., Suvak, M. K., Gagnon, D. R., et al. (2010). Longitudinal risk factors for intimate partner violence among men in treatment for alcohol use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 924–935. doi:10.1037/a0021093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. T., Walling, S. M., Howard, J. M., & Monson, C. (2011). Trauma, PTSD, and partner violence in military families. In S. M. Wadsworth & D. Riggs (Eds.), Risk and resilience in U.S. military families (pp. 195–212). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7064-0_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers, F. W., Keane, T. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: A review of the first ten years of research. Depression and Anxiety, 13, 132–156. doi:10.1002/da.1029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System (116B-4), 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA

    Casey T. Taft, Alexandra Macdonald & Patricia A. Resick

  2. Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Casey T. Taft, Alexandra Macdonald & Patricia A. Resick

  3. Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Candice M. Monson

  4. Fresno Pacific University, Fresno, CA, USA

    Sherry M. Walling

  5. University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Christopher M. Murphy

Authors
  1. Casey T. Taft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Macdonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Candice M. Monson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sherry M. Walling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patricia A. Resick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christopher M. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey T. Taft.

Additional information

Author Note

Casey T. Taft, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine; Alexandra Macdonald, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine; Candice M. Monson, Department of Psychology, Ryerson University; Sherry M. Walling, Department of Psychology, Fresno Pacific University; Patricia A. Resick, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, and Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Boston University; Christopher M. Murphy, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taft, C.T., Macdonald, A., Monson, C.M. et al. “Strength at Home” Group Intervention for Military Populations Engaging in Intimate Partner Violence: Pilot Findings. J Fam Viol 28, 225–231 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9496-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9496-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation