Abstract
Relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment in women experiencing extensive psychological abuse were examined to determine predictive factors. Participants were the top quartile of a national sample of women in conflictual relationships (N = 81) experiencing psychological maltreatment. Relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment were each used as criterion variables with conceptually related factors as the predictors (e.g., reactions to the psychological abuse; mental health indicators; personality variables; perceived harm; problematic relationship schemas; response styles; demographics). These relationship markers were differentially predicted within this group of women. Three independent clusters of women, based on patterns of satisfaction, investment, and commitment scores, were compared regarding physical abuse, reactions to psychological abuse, ratings of perceived harm, endorsement of relationship schemas, psychological distress variables, and personality variables. The cluster of women reporting higher satisfaction, investment, and commitment in these seemingly aversive relationships frequently demonstrated differences from the other two clusters. Implications for clinical applications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191.
Bauserman, S. A., & Arias, I. (1992). Relationships among marital investment, marital satisfaction, and marital commitment in domestically victimized and nonvictimized wives. Violence and Victims, 7(4), 287–296.
Ben-Ari, A., Winstok, Z., & Eisikovits, Z. (2003). Choice within entrapment and entrapment within choice: the challenge facing battered women who stay. Families in Society, 84(4), 539–546.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford.
Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.
Follingstad, D. R. (2009). Psychological aggression and women’s mental health: the status of the field. Trauma, Violence & Abuse: A Review Journal, 10(3), 271–289.
Follingstad, D. R. (2011). A measure of severe psychological abuse normed on a nationally representative sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(6), 1194–1214.
Follingstad, D. R., & Edmundson, M. (2010). Is psychological abuse reciprocal in intimate relationships? Data from a national sample of American adults. Journal of Family Violence, 25(5), 495–508.
Frye, N. E. (2006). Relationship problems and physical aggression: the moderating role of temporal comparison. Personal Relationships, 13(3), 303–315.
Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: an empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432–446.
Jones, W. H., Adams, J. M., Monroe, P. R., & Berry, J. O. (1995). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10(4), 923–932.
Jordan, C. E., Campbell, R., & Follingstad, D. R. (2010). Violence against women: Physical, sexual, and psychological aggression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema, T. D. Cannon, & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Annual review of clinical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 607–628). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Kim, J., & Gray, K. A. (2008). Leave or stay?: Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(10), 1465–1482.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.
Lerner, C. F., & Kennedy, L. T. (2000). Stay–leave decision making in battered women: trauma, coping and self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 215–232.
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Jamerson, J. E., Samuel, D. B., Olson, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the Five-Factor Model. Assessment, 13(2), 119–137.
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 45(1), 141–151.
Noyes, R., Langbehn, D. R., Happel, R. L., Sieren, L. R., & Muller, B. A. (1999). Psychosomatics. Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 40(6), 470–478.
Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.
Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). Using the investment model to understand battered women’s commitment to abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 21(2), 153–162.
Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay?: Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(4), 391–406.
Robins, C. J., Ladd, J., Welkowitz, J., Blaney, P. H., Diaz, R., & Kutcher, G. (1994). The Personal Style Inventory: preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16(4), 277–300.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: a test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: the development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.
Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: an investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–391.
Sibley, C. G., Fischer, R., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1524–1536.
Smith, P. H., Tessaro, I., & Earp, J. A. (1995). Women’s experiences with battering: a conceptualization from qualitative research. Women’s Health Issues, 5(4), 173–182.
Star, B. (1978). Comparing battered and non-battered women. Victimology, 3(1–2), 32–44.
Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the self-handicapping scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 211–224.
Ullman, S. E. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: a measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(3), 257–271.
Warren, J., & Lanning, W. (1992). Sex role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7(1), 1–8.
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Follingstad, D.R., Rogers, M.J. & Duvall, J.L. Factors Predicting Relationship Satisfaction, Investment, and Commitment When Women Report High Prevalence of Psychological Abuse. J Fam Viol 27, 257–273 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9422-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9422-8