Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Inside View of Police Officers’ Experience with Domestic Violence

Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the recognition of domestic violence (DV) in the late 1970s, police officers have been frontline providers. Despite their changing role as a result of the criminalization of DV, little is known about their experiences and responses to this public health issue from their unique perspective. Via focus groups, 22 police officers discussed their scope of practice and emotional reactions to DV calls. Participants reported frustration with the recurring nature of DV and with the larger systems’ lack of accountability (e.g., courts, prosecution and community) that follow their initial interventions. Participants discussed the limitations of their role as protectors of public safety, attitudes that evolve over time and their beliefs as to contributing factors that perpetuate DV. Additionally, the officers recommend: more professional training, counseling, incident debriefing for officers including feedback on case disposition, better collaboration across professional groups, and evidence-based prosecution. Harsher penalties were also recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. (2009). Domestic violence civil protection orders (CPOs) by state. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence.

  • Arrest without a warrant, by police officer, & when and where authorized. (2011). N.Y. C.P.L.§ 140.10.

  • Berk, S., & Loseke, D. (1980). “Handling” family violence: situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances. Law and Society Review, 15, 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, G. (2003). The changing prosecutorial response. In J. Westby, E. Budd & D. Santoyo (Eds.), Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (pp. 191–211). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Cerulli, C., Edwardsen, E., Duda, J., Conner, K., & Caine, E. (2010). Proposed coordinated health care response for order of protection petitioners. Violence Against Women Journal, 16(6), 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualatative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., O’Sullivan, C., Farole, D., & Rempel, M. (2008). A comparison of two prosecution policies in cases of intimate partner violence: mandatory case filing versus following the victim’s lead. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(4), 633–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejong, C., & Burgess-Proctor, A. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the united states. Violence Against Women, 12(1077–8012; 1), 68–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E. (2003). Domestic violence: arrest, prosecution, and reducing violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitle, D. D. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 573–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., Hoskin, A. W., & Deane, G. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. A. (1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: a study of victim decision-making. Family Relations, 32, 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: a note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25(2), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. A., & Regoli, M. J. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Process, problems, and effects. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 127–164). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, C. (1996). No right to choose: mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109, 1850–1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1449–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2001). The relative effects of offense, offender, and victim variables on the decision to prosecute domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 7(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49(2), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1985). Police perceptions of spouse abuse: a comparison of male and female officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(1), 29–47. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(85)90024-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. (2002). Community-wide professional response to partner violence. (doctoral dissertation, the union institute and university, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, F., Joacob, M., Hardy, J., & Martin, G. (1989). Police attitudes in assigning responsibility for wife abuse. Journal of Family Medicine, 4, 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, Walker, & Leukefeld. (2001). Rural, urban influenced, and urban differences among domestic violence arrestees. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(3), 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from spouse assault replication program. Washington: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Dept. of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2002). The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: research, policy and theory. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(1), 51–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. (1997). Mandatory prosecution in domestic violence cases: intuition and insight: a new job description for the battered woman’s prosecutor and other more modest proposals. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 7, 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. G. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: a critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. G. (1999). Killing her softly: intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Review, 113, 550–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhr, T. (1993–2010). Atlas.ti 6.0. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.

  • National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauma, D. (1984). Going for the gold: prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176–191). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, L. E., Green, Y. T., Marks, J. S., & Thacker, S. B. (2000). Violence against women as a public health issue. Comments from the CDC. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 325–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. (1991). From initial deterrence to long-term escalation: short-custody arrest for poverty ghetto domestic violence. Criminology, 29(4), 821–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. (1992a). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. Criminology, 83(1), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (1992b). Policing domestic violence. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984). Police response to domestic violence incidents. American Sociology Revue, 49, 261–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 680–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalans, L., & Finn, M. (2000). Gender differences in officers perceptions and decisions about domestic violence cases. Women and Criminal Justice, 11, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, B., & Sinden, P. (2000). Victims’ voices domestic assault victims’ perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 534–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A., & Maddren, K. (1997). Police officers’ judgements of blame in family violence: the impact of gender and alcohol. Sex Roles, 37, 921–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.

  • Wolf, M., Ly, U., Hobart, M., & Kernic, M. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Cerulli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horwitz, S.H., Mitchell, D., LaRussa-Trott, M. et al. An Inside View of Police Officers’ Experience with Domestic Violence. J Fam Viol 26, 617–625 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9396-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9396-y

Keywords

Navigation