Date: 20 May 2009
Work-Home Conflict and Domestic Violence: A Test of a Conceptual Model
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence is examined using data from 295 adults, who worked full time and were in serious relationships. Job satisfaction, gender, gender role attitudes, type of employment, and socioeconomic status were examined as predictors of work-family conflict. Backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that job satisfaction was the only predictor of work-home conflict. Regression analyses were again conducted to determine the moderating effects of general well-being, alcohol use, family of origin violence witnessed or experienced, communication skills, and social support on the relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence. Both family of origin violence witnessed and personally experienced were revealed as moderators of this relationship. The remaining potential moderators were submitted to regression analyses to determine if they might, instead, be mediators. These analyses revealed that negative communication skills and social support mediated the relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 575–582. doi:10.1037/h0045925.
Barnett, O., Miller-Perrin, C., & Perrin, R. (2005). Family violence across the lifespan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. E. (1999). Self-esteem and partner violence: A Meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the Sixth International family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Occupational Classification System Manual. Retrieved October 2, 2006, from http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/ocsm/commain.htm.
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: theory, research, and application (pp. 73–94). The Hague, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gelles, R. (1994). Family violence, abuse, and neglect. In P. McHenry & S. Price (Eds.), Families and change: coping with stressful events (pp. 262–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hesse-Biber, S., & Carter, G. L. (2000). Working women in America: split dreams. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2005). Family violence in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. New Haven: Yale University.
Hoyle, R., & Robinson, J. (2003). Mediated and moderated effects in social psychological Research: measurement, design, and analysis issues. In C. Sansone, C. Morf & A. T. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson, M. (2000). Conflict and control: images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kantor, G., & Jasinski, J. (1998). Dynamics and risk factors in partner violence. In J. Jasinski & L. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research, 1–43.
Kenny, D. A. (2006). Mediation. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
Mantsios, G. (2004). Class in America–2003. In P. S. Rothberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States (6th ed., pp. 193–206). New York: Worth.
Mignon, S., Larson, C., & Holmes, W. (2002). Family abuse: consequences, theories, and responses. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Partnership for Prevention. (2002). Domestic violence and the workplace. Washington, D.C.: Partnership for Prevention.
Preacher, K., & Leonardelli, G. (2006). Calculation for the Sobel test. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de le Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). WHO Collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption—II. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 88, 791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
Schaefer, C., Coyne, J., & Lazarus, R. (1981). The health related functions of social support. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 4, 381–406.CrossRef
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.
Straus, M. (1990). Social stress and marital violence in a national sample of American families. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families (pp. 181–202). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Straus, M. (2004). Scoring the CTS2 and CTSPC. Retrieved September 1, 2006 from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/CTS28a3.pdf.
Straus, M., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.
Wallen, J. (2002). Balancing work and family: the role of the workplace. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.
Widom, C. S., & Maxfield, M. G. (2001). An update on the “Cycle of Violence” (NCJ Publication No. 184894). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
- Work-Home Conflict and Domestic Violence: A Test of a Conceptual Model
Journal of Family Violence
Volume 24, Issue 7 , pp 471-483
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Work-home conflict
- Work-family conflict
- Domestic violence
- Family violence
- Intimate partner violence
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Applied Research in Human Development, Human Development & Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Room 142, U-1117, Storrs, CT, 06269-1117, USA
- 2. Center for Applied Research in Human Development, Human Development & Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- 3. Human Development & Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA