Gender Inequality and Patterns of Abuse Post Leaving
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Drawing on Connell’s (Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. California: Stanford University Press, 1987; Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995) model of gender relations, this paper examines patterns of intimate partner violence among women who have recently left an abusive partner. In so doing, we attempt to better understand the social structural factors that shape the relations of power and control in intimate violent heterosexual unions. The data come from the first wave of a longitudinal prospective survey of 309 women who had left an abusive partner in the previous 3 years. Our data suggest that structured relations of inequality, namely relations of production, power and cathexis, shape women’s risk of abuse and harassment after leaving, and do so in ways that shape relations of coercive control. These results have implications for understanding the social context within which male violence against women occurs, and how this context constrains and/or enables women’s strategies for leaving and safety.
- Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. doi:10.1177/1524838002250769. CrossRef
- Andreb, H. J., & Brockel, M. (2007). Income and life satisfaction after marital disruption in Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 500–512. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00379.x. CrossRef
- Arendell, T. (1995). Fathers & divorce: At the intersection of family and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Bowlus, A. J., & Seitz, S. N. (2006). Domestic violence, employment and divorce. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1113–1149. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00408.x. CrossRef
- Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: a contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(6), 743–762. doi:10.1177/088626098013006005. CrossRef
- Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. California: Stanford University Press.
- Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Cross-border encounters: challenges and opportunities. In R. E. Dobash, & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 1–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Fleury, R. E., Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6(12), 1363–1383. doi:10.1177/10778010022183695. CrossRef
- Ford-Gilboe, M., Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2005). Strengthening capacity to limit intrusion: theorizing family health promotion in the aftermath of woman abuse. Qualitative Health Research, 15(4), 477–501. doi:10.1177/1049732305274590. CrossRef
- Fox, G. L., Benson, M. L., DeMaris, A. A., & Van Wyk, J. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(3), 793–807. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00793.x. CrossRef
- Hardesty, J. L. (2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting: an integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(5), 597–625. doi:10.1177/107780102400388452. CrossRef
- Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H. (2006). Intimate partner violence, parental divorce, and child custody: directions for intervention and future research. Family Relations, 55(2), 200–210. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00370.x. CrossRef
- Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody & domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Johnson, H. (1995). Risk factors associated with non-lethal violence against women by marital partners. In C. R. Block, & R. Block (Eds.), Questions and answers in lethal and nonlethal violence (vol. 3, pp. 151–168). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018. doi:10.1177/1077801206293328. CrossRef
- Kernic, M. A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: child custody determination among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11(8), 991–1021. doi:10.1177/1077801205278042. CrossRef
- Krieger, N., Williams, D. R., & Moss, M. E. (1997). Measuring social class in US Public Health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 341–378. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341. CrossRef
- Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce and woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 2(1), 63–81. doi:10.1177/1077801296002001004. CrossRef
- Mahoney, M. (1991). Legal images of battered women: redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1–94. doi:10.2307/1289533. CrossRef
- McCloskey, L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10(4), 449–463. doi:10.1177/089124396010004006. CrossRef
- McFarlane, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316. doi:10.1177/1088767999003004003. CrossRef
- McMullin, J. A., Davies, L., & Cassidy, G. L. (2002). Welfare reform in Ontario: tough times in mothers’ lives. Canadian Public Policy, 28(2), 297–314. doi:10.2307/3552330. CrossRef
- Parker, B., & McFarlane, J. (1991). Nursing assessment of the battered pregnant woman. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 16, 161–164. doi:10.1097/00005721-199105000-00013. CrossRef
- Piispa, M. (2002). Complexity of patterns of violence against women in heterosexual partnerships. Violence Against Women, 8(7), 873–900. doi:10.1177/107780102400388515. CrossRef
- Ross, C. E., & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control: social-structural causes and emotional consequences. In C. S. Aneshensel, & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 369–394). New York: Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers.
- Sev’er, A. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate partner violence against women. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 566–589. doi:10.1177/1077801297003006002. CrossRef
- Sheridan, D. J. (1998). Measuring harassment of abused women: A nursing concern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
- Smith, P. H., Earp, J., & DeVellis, R. (1995). Measuring battering: development of the women’s experience with battering (WEB) scale. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1(4), 273–288.
- Smith, P. H., Edwards, G., & DeVellis, R. (1998). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence, co-occurrence, and health consequences. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
- Smith, P. H., Thornton, G. E., DeVellis, R., Earp, J., & Coker, A. L. (2002). A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault, and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(10), 1208–1232. doi:10.1177/107780102320562691. CrossRef
- Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025. doi:10.1177/1077801206293329. CrossRef
- Statistics Canada (1997). Family income after separation, 1987 to 1993. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
- Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: the case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 638–650. doi:10.2307/353566. CrossRef
- Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Varcoe, C. (1996). Theorizing oppression: implications of nursing research on violence against women. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 28, 61–78.
- Varcoe, C. (2008). Inequality, violence and women’s health. In B. S. Bolaria, & H. Dickinson (Eds.), Health, illness and health care in Canada (pp. 259–282, 4th ed.). Toronto: Nelson.
- Varcoe, C., & Irwin, L. (2004). “If I killed you, I’d get the kids.” Women’s survival and protection work with child custody and access in the context of woman abuse. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 77–99. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015545.82803.90. CrossRef
- Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3–15.
- Wilson, M., Johnson, H., & Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 331–362.
- Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Berman, H. (2003). Intrusion: the central problem for family health promotion among children and single mothers after leaving an abusive partner. Qualitative Health Research, 13(5), 597–622. doi:10.1177/1049732303013005002. CrossRef
- Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Lemire, S. (2006). Using grounded theory to generate a theoretical understanding of the effects of child custody policy on women’s health promotion in the context of intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 27, 490–512. CrossRef
- Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1999). Not going back: sustaining the separation in the process of leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 110–133.
- Wuest, J., Merritt-Gray, M., & Ford-Gilboe, M. (2004). Regenerating family: strengthening the emotional health of mothers and children in the context of intimate partner violence. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(4), 257–274.
- Gender Inequality and Patterns of Abuse Post Leaving
Journal of Family Violence
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 27-39
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Intimate partner violence
- Gender inequality
- Patterns of abuse