Skip to main content
Log in

Availability Analysis for CFETR

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Availability analysis for Chinese fusion engineering testing reactor (CFETR) is very important at the pre-conceptual phase. Availability apportion are the theoretical basis of system design of CFETR. Availability analysis informs the development of the CFETR overall system and subsystem design. Availability analysis will enable the identification of key subsystems to achieve availability targets. The duty cycle of CFETR should be at least 0.3–0.5. Such design goals require all subsystems of CFETR must have a pretty high availability. The availability of CFETR can be defined by break time analysis results. Analysis results proved that the availability of CFETR is 0.5–0.7. All availability subsystems of CFETR can be apportioned from their relevant mean time before failure (MTBF) and mean time to repair (MTTR) data to meet the availability goals. The relation between reliability, maintainability and availability indicates that a subsystem could have a high availability though its reliability is pretty low. Availability apportionment and analysis indicate that the availability of blanket and divertor should be 0.769–0.91 to meet the design requirements and their availability can be improved by increase the MTBF and reduce the MTTR of blanket and divertor with the development of remote handling or remote maintenance technology for fusion reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y.X. Wan, J. Li, Y. Liu, X.L. Wang, CFETR: Mission, Progress and Future plan (CIC Workshop, HeFei, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Buende, Fusion Technol. 11, 139 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Mettas, Reliability allocation and optimisation for complex systems. IEEE Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (2000)

  4. M. Haire, J.G. Maltese, R.G. Sohmert, A system availability top-down apportionment method. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1985)

  5. J. Schryver, M. Haire, Spallation Neutron Source Availability Top-Down Apportionment Using Characteristic Factors and Expert Opinion (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Nikolaidis, D.M. Ghiocel, S. Singhal, Engineering Design Reliability Hand Book (CRC Press LIC, Boca Raton, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Tuominen, T. Ahonen, RAMI method for DEMO development. Euratom-Tekes Annual Seminar, Silia Serenade (2013)

  8. M. Abdou, Next steps for realizing fusion power and comparative analysis of roadmaps of world major fusion programs. TOFE 2012 ANS 20th Topical Meeting on the Technology of fusion Energy, Nashville, TN (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, L., Yao, D. & Zhou, Z. Availability Analysis for CFETR. J Fusion Energ 33, 523–528 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-014-9706-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-014-9706-5

Keywords

Navigation