Skip to main content
Log in

Modulation of Aphid Alarm Pheromone Emission of Pea Aphid Prey by Predators

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies on animal alarm signaling have shown that alarm calls generally are not uniform, but may vary depending on the type and intensity of threat. While alarm call variability has been studied intensively in birds and mammals, little is known about such variation in insects. We investigated variability in alarm signaling in aphids, group-living insect herbivores. Under attack, aphids release droplets containing a volatile alarm pheromone, (E)-β-farnesene (EBF), that induces specific escape behavior in conspecifics. We used a handheld gas chromatograph (zNose™), which allows real-time volatile analysis, to measure EBF emission by pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, under attack from different predators, lacewing or ladybird larvae. We demonstrate that aphid alarm signaling is affected by the predator species attacking. Ladybirds generally elicited smaller EBF emission peaks and consumed aphids more quickly, resulting in lower total EBF emission compared to lacewing attacks. In 52 % of the replicates with lacewings and 23 % with ladybirds, no EBF was detectable in the headspace, although aphids secreted cornicle droplets after attack. We, therefore, examined EBF amounts contained in these droplets and the aphid body. While all aphid bodies always contained EBF, many secreted droplets did not. Our experiments show that alarm signaling in insects can be variable, and both the attacker as well as the attacked may affect alarm signal variation. While underlying mechanisms of such variation in aphid-predator interactions need to be investigated in more detail, we argue that at least part of this variation may be adaptive for the predator and the aphid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers WS, Webb RE, Nault LR, Dutky SR (1972) Aphid alarm pheromone––isolation, identification, synthesis. Science 177:1121–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA (2005) A cost of alarm pheromone production in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii. Naturwissenschaften 92:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canard M, Duelli P (1984) Predatory behavior of larvae and cannibalism. In: Canard M, Séméria Y, New TR (eds.). Biology of Chrysopidae. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp. 92–100

  • Chen SW, Edwards JS (1972) Observations on structure of secretory cells associated with aphid cornicles. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 130:312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1976) The Ethology of Predation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AFG (1998) Aphid Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS (1966) Defence by smear-supercooling in cornicle wax of aphids. Nature 211:73–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerland MW, Sandvik L (2009) The Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney Test under Scrutiny. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis FD, Martin T, Lognay G, Haubruge E (2005) Role of (E)-beta-farnesene in systematic aphid prey location by Episyrphus balteatus larvae (Diptera : Syrphidae). Eur J Entomol 102:431–436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gut J, van Oosten AM (1985) Functional-significance of the alarm pheromone composition in various morphs of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 37:199–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatano E, Kunert G, Bartram S, Boland W, Gershenzon J, Weisser WW (2008) Do aphid colonies amplify their emission of alarm pheromone? J Chem Ecol 34:1149–1152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunert G, Otto S, Rose USR, Gershenzon J, Weisser WW (2005) Alarm pheromone mediates production of winged dispersal morphs in aphids. Ecol Lett 8:596–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunert M, Biedermann A, Koch T, Boland W (2002) Ultrafast sampling and analysis of plant volatiles by a hand-held miniaturised GC with pre-concentration unit: kinetic and quantitative aspects of plant volatile production. J Sep Sci 25:677–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macedonia JM, Evans CS (1993) Variation among mammalian alarm call systems and the problem of meaning in animal signals. Ethology 93:177–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majerus MEN (1994) Ladybirds. Harper Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2002) Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends Cogn Sci 6:55–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995) Chemical alarm signals—predator deterrents or predator attractants. Am Nat 145:994–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister MK, Roitberg BD, Weldon KL (1990) Adaptive suicide in pea aphids—decisions are cost sensitive. Anim Behav 40:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Baird DS, Slessor KN, Roitberg BD (2000) Ontogeny of alarm pheromone secretion in pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Chem Ecol 26:2875–2882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Roitberg BD (2003) Age-dependent fitness costs of alarm signaling in aphids. Can J Zool 81:757–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Roitberg BD (2004) Inclusive fitness benefits of scent-marking predators. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 271:341–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nault LR, Bowers WS (1974) Multiple alarm pheromones in aphids. Entomol Exp Appl 17:455–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nault LR, Phelan PL (1984) Alarm Pheromones and Sociality in Pre-social Insects. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Outreman Y, Kunert G, Simon JC, Weisser WW (2010) Ecological costs of alarm signalling in aphids. In: Kindlmann P, Dixon AFG, Michaud JP (eds.). Aphid Biodiversity under Environmental Change. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 171–181

  • Roitberg BD, Myers JH, Frazer BD (1979) The influence of predators on the movement of apterous pea aphids between plants. J Anim Ecol 48:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzberg EG, Kunert G, Stephan C, David A, Rose USR, Gershenzon J, Boland W, Weisser WW (2008) Real-time analysis of alarm pheromone emission by the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) under predation. J Chem Ecol 34:76–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210:801–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005) Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308:1934–1937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Emden HF, Harrington R (2007) Aphids as crop pests. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen FJ, Haubruge E, de Moraes CM, Mescher MC (2009) Social enviroment influences aphid production of alarm pheromone. Behav Ecol 20:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen FJ, Haubruge E, Mescher MC (2010) Alarm pheromones—chemical signaling in response to danger. In: Litwack G (ed) Vitamins and Hormones. Academic, Philadelphia, pp. 215–239

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberbühler K (2001) Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell’s monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberbühler K (2009) Survivor signals: the biology and psychology of animal alarm calling. Adv Study Behav 40:277–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Katz Biotech Services for supplying C. carnea and C. septempunctata free of charge. We thank Wilhelm Boland for permission to use the zNose™ of the MPI for Chemical Ecology. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE 3081/2-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Joachim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

Time course of aphid alarm pheromone (EBF) emission after attack by a lacewing larva in the first experiment. A) run #16. Duration - 226.00 min, total EBF emission - 24.28 ng, B) run #32. Duration - 116.00 min, total EBF emission - 22.85 ng. (JPEG 18 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 5404 kb)

Figure S2

Time course of aphid alarm pheromone (EBF) emission after attack by a ladybird larva in the first experiment. A) run #10. Duration - 46.00 min, total EBF emission - 3.60 ng, B) run #19. Duration - 30.00 min, total EBF emission - 3.15 ng. (JPEG 16 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 5352 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joachim, C., Hatano, E., David, A. et al. Modulation of Aphid Alarm Pheromone Emission of Pea Aphid Prey by Predators. J Chem Ecol 39, 773–782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0288-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0288-x

Keywords

Navigation