Floral Odor Bouquet Loses its Ant Repellent Properties After Inhibition of Terpene Biosynthesis
First Online: 09 December 2011 Received: 20 February 2011 Revised: 04 September 2011 Accepted: 28 November 2011 DOI:
10.1007/s10886-011-0043-0 Cite this article as: Junker, R.R., Gershenzon, J. & Unsicker, S.B. J Chem Ecol (2011) 37: 1323. doi:10.1007/s10886-011-0043-0 Abstract
In their natural environment, plants are synchronously confronted with mutualists and antagonists, and thus benefit from signals that contain messages for both functional groups of interaction partners. Floral scents are complex blends of volatiles of different chemical classes, including benzenoids and terpenoids. It has been hypothesized that benzenoids have evolved as pollinator attracting signals, while monoterpenoids serve as defensive compounds against antagonists. In order to test this hypothesis, we reduced terpene emission in flowers of
Phlox paniculata with specific biosynthetic inhibitors and compared the responses of Lasius niger ants to natural and inhibited floral scent bouquets. While the natural odors were strongly repellent to ants, the bouquets with a reduced emission rate of terpenoids were not. The loss of the flowers’ ability to repel ants could be attributed predominantly to reduced amounts of linalool, a monoterpene alcohol. Flying flower visitors, mainly hoverflies, did not discriminate between the two types of flowers in an outdoor experiment. Since individual compounds appear to be capable of either attracting pollinators or defending the flower from enemies, the complexity of floral scent bouquets may have evolved to allow flowers to respond to both mutualists and antagonists simultaneously. Key Words Biochemical pathways Floral volatiles Direct defense Lasius niger Olfactometer experiments Phlox paniculata References
dams, R. P. 2007. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed. Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, Illinois.
L. A., G
I., and B
G. 2002. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: possible convergence in chemical composition.
Bot. J. Linn. Soc.
A., and P
A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility.
Biol. J. Linn. Soc.
N., and J
R. R. 2011. Ant-plant mutualism in Hawaii? Invasive ants reduce flower parasitism but also exploit floral nectar of the endemic shrub
L. 2001. Random forests.
, L. 2003. Manual--Setting Up, Using, And Understanding Random Forests V4.0.
J. H. 1986. Predator deterrence by mandibular gland secretions of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea).
J. Chem. Ecol.
J. P., M
C. J., Z
M. P., and W
S. A. 2004. Learning, odour preference and flower foraging in moths.
J. Exp. Biol.
obson, H. E. M. 2006. Relationship between floral fragrance composition and type of pollinator. pp. 147-198 in Biology of Floral Scent (eds N. Dudareva and E. Pichersky). CRC Press, Boca Raton.
B., and S
S. 2006. Nursery pollination by a moth in
: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses.
W., and G
J. 2005. The nonmevalonate pathway supports both monoterpene and sesquiterpene formation in snapdragon flowers.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
UDAREVA, N. and P ICHERSKY, E. 2006. Biology of Floral Scent. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
C. 1983. The effects of nectar thieving ants on seedset in floral scent morphs of
J. and D
N. 2007. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world.
Nature Chem. Biol.
J. M. 2000. Effectiveness of ants as pollinators of
: effects on main sequential fitness components of the host plant.
J. M. and Z
R. 1992. Pollination by ants: consequences of quantitative effects on a mutualistic system.
R. R., B
C. C., and B
N. 2010a. Intra-floral resource partitioning between endemic and invasive flower visitors: consequences for pollinator effectiveness.
unker, R. R. and B lüthgen, N. 2008. Floral scents repel potentially nectar-thieving ants. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10:295–308.
R. R. and B
N. 2010a. Dependency on floral resources determines the animals’ responses to floral scents.
Plant Signal. Behav.
R. R. and B
N. 2010b. Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones.
R. R., D
C. C., D
A., and B
N. 2011a. Hawaiian ant-flower networks: nectar-thieving ants prefer undefended native over introduced plants with floral defenses.
R. R., H
N., and B
N. 2010b. Responses to olfactory signals reflect network structure of flower-visitor interactions.
J. Anim. Ecol.
unker, R. R., L oewel, C., G ross, R., D ötterl, S., K eller, A., and B lüthgen, N. 2011b. Composition of epiphytic bacterial communities differs on petals and leaves. Plant Biol. 13:918–924.
A. and H
R. 2009. Testing the potential for conflicting selection on floral chemical traits by pollinators and herbivores: predictions and case study.
D. and B
I. T. 2007. Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of
K., and B
I. T. 2008. Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents.
M. S., and G
J. L. 1980. Feedback-regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme a reductase in livers of mice treated with mevinolin, a competitive inhibitor of the reductase.
J. Clin. Invest.
J. T., E
J., and S
B. 2006. Diversity and distribution of floral scent.
L. 2005. Interference and exploitation competition of three nectar-thieving invasive ant species.
M. M., R
Wadhams, L. J.
2000. Recognition of complex odors by restrained and free-flying honeybees,
J. Chem. Ecol.
M. A., and D
M. 2008. Significance of terpenoids in induced indirect plant defence against herbivorous arthropods.
Plant Cell Environ.
J. 1970. An aphid sex attractant. I. Biological studies.
A. M., I
L. R., and L
A. 2006. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction.
DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
R. A. 2008a. Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology.
Entomol. Exp. Appl.
R. A. 2008b. Wake up and smell the roses: The ecology and evolution of floral scent.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.
Y. and B
R. M. 2010. Reducing the babel in plant volatile communication: using the forest to see the trees.
einhard, J., S inclair, M., S rinivasan, M. V., and C laudianos, C. 2010. Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants. PLoS One 5.
J. A., L
T. A., and H
J. G. 2009. Characterization and coding of behaviorally significant odor mixtures.
canion, J. T. and W illis, D. E. 1985. Calculation of flame ionization detector relative response factors using the effective carbon number concept. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 23:333–340.
C. C. N. V., H
M. A., and S
R. C. 2006. Regulation of terpenoid and benzenoid production in flowers.
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
F. P. 2010. The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication.
F. P., H
F. K., and G
J. M. 2011. Phenotypic selection on floral scent: trade-off between attraction and deterrence?
mith, B. H., W right, G. A., and D aly, K. C. 2006. Learning-based recognition and discrimination of floral odors. pp. 263-296 in Biology of Floral Scent (eds N. Dudareva and E. Pichersky). CRC Press, Boca Raton.
L. D., E
A. M., C
L. M., M
L. A. M., and S
D. M. 2008. Floral attractants for the female soybean looper,
Pest Manag. Sci.
S. B., K
G., and G
J. 2009. Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores.
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
P. G., N
C. V, R
N. E., S
G. N., P
J. G., H
S. G., and K
J. T. 2009. Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour.
G. A. and S
F. P. 2009. The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards.
S. 1994. Flower nectar of an autogamous perennial
as an indirect defense-mechanism against herbivorous insects.
Res. Popul. Ecol.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011