Abstract
Our primary focus in this study was to examine the effect of conditional discrimination training on reducing high-rate mands in two young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and language delays. Our secondary purpose in this study was to examine the effect of alternative activities during extended delays when reinforcement was unavailable on children’s response allocation. First, we taught each child to emit discriminated responding by reinforcing his mand in one stimulus condition (i.e., green light) and not reinforcing it in a different stimulus condition (i.e., red light). Next, we examined children’s responding during a gradually-increased duration of the extinction condition when a choice for alternative activities was present. Finally, we examined maintenance of the newly acquired discriminated responding. Data indicate that our conditional discrimination training was effective in reducing children’s high-rate mands in the presence of a discriminative stimulus. Response allocation data suggest that both children showed a preference for a leisure activity during extended delays when reinforcement was unavailable. Both children maintained the skills 8-weeks after the intervention was discontinued.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, J. E., & Tiger, J. H. (2015). Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 663–668. doi:10.1002/jaba.215.
Borrero, C. S. W., Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Bourret, J. C., Sloman, K. N., Samaha, A. L., & Dallery, J. (2010). Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 455–469. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-455.
Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). New York: Sloan Publishing.
Chadsey-Rusch, & Halle, J. (1992). The application of general-case instruction to the requesting repertoires of learners with severe disabilities. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 121–132. doi:10.1177/154079699201700301.
Davidson, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Drasgow, E., Sigafoos, J., Halle, J., & Martin, C. (2009). Teaching mands. In P. Sturmey & A. Fitzer (Eds.), Language and autism: Applied behavior analysis, evidence, and practice (pp. 135–168). Austin: Pro-Ed.
Fisher, W. W., & Mazur, J. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387.
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Fisher, W. W., Kuhn, D. E., & Thompson, R. H. (1998). Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 543–560. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543.
Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24, 3–29. doi:10.1177/0145445500241001.
Guess, D., Benson, H. A., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 79–86. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.75.
Gutierrez, A., Jr., Vollmer, T. R., Dozier, C. L., Borrero, J. C., Rapp, J. T., Borret, J. C., & Gadaire, D. (2007). Manipulating establishing operations to verify and establish stimulus control during mand training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 645–659. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.645-658.
Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Sullivan, M. T., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L. A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 211–235. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.
Hagopian, L. P., Contrucci Kuhn, S. A., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005.43-04.
Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997). Noncontingent presentation of attention and substitute stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229–237. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-229.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & Thompson, R. H. (2001). Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 17–38. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17.
Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Barretto, A., & Lee, J. F. (2005). An evaluation of choice responding during assessment and treatment of problem behavior. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 6, 145–164. doi:10.1080/15021149.2005.11434257.
Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Winborn-Kemmerer, L., & Lee, J. F. (2009). Evaluation of choice allocation between positive and negative reinforcement during functional communication training with young children. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 443–456. doi:10.1007/s10882-009-9155-7.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
Jarmolowicz, D. P., DeLeon, I. G., & Contrucci Kuhn, S. A. (2009). Functional communication during signaled reinforcement and/or extinction. Behavioral Interventions, 24, 265–273. doi:10.1002/bin.288.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University.
Kennedy, C. H. (2002). The maintenance of behavior change as an indicator of social validity. Behavior Modification, 26, 594–604. doi:10.1177/014544502236652.
Martin, C. A., Drasgow, E., Halle, J. W., & Brucker, J. M. (2005). Teaching a child with autism and severe language delays to reject: Direct and indirect effects of functional communication training. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25, 287–304. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301210.
Martin, C. A., Drasgow, E., & Halle, J. W. (2015). Training teachers to enhance the play skills of young children with developmental disabilities during outdoor time by embedding instructional interactions. Journal of Early Intervention, 37, 247–269. doi:10.1177/1053815115620209.
Nigro-Bruzzi, D., & Sturmey, P. (2010). The effects of behavioral skills training on mand training by staff and unprompted vocal mands by children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 757–761. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-757.
Reichle, J., & Johnston, S. S. (1999). Teaching the conditional use of communicative requests to two school-age children with severe developmental disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 324–334.
Reichle, J., & McComas, J. (2004). Conditional use of a request for assistance. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1255–1262. doi:10.1080/09638280412331280262.
Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (Eds.). (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Reichle, J., Dropik, P. L., Alden-Anderson, E., & Haley, T. (2008). Teaching a young child with autism to request attention conditionally: a preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 231–240.
Reichle, J., Byiers, B. J., & Reeve, A. (2016). Conditional use of a request for assistance: considering generalization. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. doi:10.1177/1088357616647349. Advance online publication.
Reid, D. H., & Parsons, M. B. (2002). Working with staff to overcome challenging behavior among people who have severe disabilities: A guide for getting support plans carried out. Morganton: Habilitative Management Consultants.
Roane, H. S., Fisher, W. W., Sgro, G. M., Falcomata, T. S., & Pabico, R. R. (2004). An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 213–218. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-213.
Sidener, T. M., Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., & Roland, J. P. (2006). An evaluation of strategies to maintain mands at practical levels. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 632–644. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.08.002.
Sigafoos, J., & Drasgow, E. (2001). Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC: a review and clinical case demonstration. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 152–161. doi:10.1177/108835760101600303.
Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., Reichle, J., O’Reilly, M., Green, V. A., & Tait, K. (2004). Tutorial: teaching communicative rejecting to children with severe disabilities. Forum on Intervention Strategies for Severe Disabilities, 13, 31–42.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. East Norwalk: Appleton. doi:10.1037/11256-000.
Tiger, H. H., & Hanley, G. P. (2004). Developing stimulus control of preschooler mands: an analysis of schedule-correlated and contingency-specifying stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 517–521. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-517.
Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Heal, N. A. (2006). The effectiveness of and preschoolers’ preferences for variations of multiple-schedule arrangements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 475–488. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.48-06.
Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Lalli, J. S., & Daniel, D. (1999). Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 451–466. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-451.
Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Comparison Designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single-case research design methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 297–345). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participant were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all children participating in this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chezan, L., Drasgow, E., Legg, J. et al. Effects of Conditional Discrimination Training and Choice Opportunities on Manding for Two Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Language Delays. J Dev Phys Disabil 28, 557–579 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9493-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9493-1