Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Conditional Discrimination Training and Choice Opportunities on Manding for Two Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Language Delays

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our primary focus in this study was to examine the effect of conditional discrimination training on reducing high-rate mands in two young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and language delays. Our secondary purpose in this study was to examine the effect of alternative activities during extended delays when reinforcement was unavailable on children’s response allocation. First, we taught each child to emit discriminated responding by reinforcing his mand in one stimulus condition (i.e., green light) and not reinforcing it in a different stimulus condition (i.e., red light). Next, we examined children’s responding during a gradually-increased duration of the extinction condition when a choice for alternative activities was present. Finally, we examined maintenance of the newly acquired discriminated responding. Data indicate that our conditional discrimination training was effective in reducing children’s high-rate mands in the presence of a discriminative stimulus. Response allocation data suggest that both children showed a preference for a leisure activity during extended delays when reinforcement was unavailable. Both children maintained the skills 8-weeks after the intervention was discontinued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. E., & Tiger, J. H. (2015). Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 663–668. doi:10.1002/jaba.215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borrero, C. S. W., Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Bourret, J. C., Sloman, K. N., Samaha, A. L., & Dallery, J. (2010). Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 455–469. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). New York: Sloan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadsey-Rusch, & Halle, J. (1992). The application of general-case instruction to the requesting repertoires of learners with severe disabilities. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 121–132. doi:10.1177/154079699201700301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasgow, E., Sigafoos, J., Halle, J., & Martin, C. (2009). Teaching mands. In P. Sturmey & A. Fitzer (Eds.), Language and autism: Applied behavior analysis, evidence, and practice (pp. 135–168). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., & Mazur, J. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Kuhn, D. E., & Thompson, R. H. (1998). Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 543–560. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24, 3–29. doi:10.1177/0145445500241001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D., Benson, H. A., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 79–86. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, A., Jr., Vollmer, T. R., Dozier, C. L., Borrero, J. C., Rapp, J. T., Borret, J. C., & Gadaire, D. (2007). Manipulating establishing operations to verify and establish stimulus control during mand training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 645–659. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.645-658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Sullivan, M. T., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L. A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 211–235. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Contrucci Kuhn, S. A., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005.43-04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997). Noncontingent presentation of attention and substitute stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229–237. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & Thompson, R. H. (2001). Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 17–38. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Barretto, A., & Lee, J. F. (2005). An evaluation of choice responding during assessment and treatment of problem behavior. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 6, 145–164. doi:10.1080/15021149.2005.11434257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Winborn-Kemmerer, L., & Lee, J. F. (2009). Evaluation of choice allocation between positive and negative reinforcement during functional communication training with young children. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 443–456. doi:10.1007/s10882-009-9155-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarmolowicz, D. P., DeLeon, I. G., & Contrucci Kuhn, S. A. (2009). Functional communication during signaled reinforcement and/or extinction. Behavioral Interventions, 24, 265–273. doi:10.1002/bin.288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H. (2002). The maintenance of behavior change as an indicator of social validity. Behavior Modification, 26, 594–604. doi:10.1177/014544502236652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. A., Drasgow, E., Halle, J. W., & Brucker, J. M. (2005). Teaching a child with autism and severe language delays to reject: Direct and indirect effects of functional communication training. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25, 287–304. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. A., Drasgow, E., & Halle, J. W. (2015). Training teachers to enhance the play skills of young children with developmental disabilities during outdoor time by embedding instructional interactions. Journal of Early Intervention, 37, 247–269. doi:10.1177/1053815115620209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro-Bruzzi, D., & Sturmey, P. (2010). The effects of behavioral skills training on mand training by staff and unprompted vocal mands by children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 757–761. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & Johnston, S. S. (1999). Teaching the conditional use of communicative requests to two school-age children with severe developmental disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & McComas, J. (2004). Conditional use of a request for assistance. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1255–1262. doi:10.1080/09638280412331280262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (Eds.). (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Dropik, P. L., Alden-Anderson, E., & Haley, T. (2008). Teaching a young child with autism to request attention conditionally: a preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 231–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Byiers, B. J., & Reeve, A. (2016). Conditional use of a request for assistance: considering generalization. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. doi:10.1177/1088357616647349. Advance online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H., & Parsons, M. B. (2002). Working with staff to overcome challenging behavior among people who have severe disabilities: A guide for getting support plans carried out. Morganton: Habilitative Management Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roane, H. S., Fisher, W. W., Sgro, G. M., Falcomata, T. S., & Pabico, R. R. (2004). An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 213–218. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidener, T. M., Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., & Roland, J. P. (2006). An evaluation of strategies to maintain mands at practical levels. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 632–644. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., & Drasgow, E. (2001). Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC: a review and clinical case demonstration. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 152–161. doi:10.1177/108835760101600303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., Reichle, J., O’Reilly, M., Green, V. A., & Tait, K. (2004). Tutorial: teaching communicative rejecting to children with severe disabilities. Forum on Intervention Strategies for Severe Disabilities, 13, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. East Norwalk: Appleton. doi:10.1037/11256-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, H. H., & Hanley, G. P. (2004). Developing stimulus control of preschooler mands: an analysis of schedule-correlated and contingency-specifying stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 517–521. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Heal, N. A. (2006). The effectiveness of and preschoolers’ preferences for variations of multiple-schedule arrangements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 475–488. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.48-06.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Lalli, J. S., & Daniel, D. (1999). Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 451–466. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Comparison Designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single-case research design methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 297–345). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Chezan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participant were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all children participating in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chezan, L., Drasgow, E., Legg, J. et al. Effects of Conditional Discrimination Training and Choice Opportunities on Manding for Two Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Language Delays. J Dev Phys Disabil 28, 557–579 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9493-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9493-1

Keywords

Navigation