Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Primary Care Prescribing Psychologist Model: Medical Provider Ratings of the Safety, Impact and Utility of Prescribing Psychology in a Primary Care Setting

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Family medicine providers at a large family medicine clinic were surveyed regarding their impression of the impact, utility and safety of the Primary Care Prescribing Psychologist (PCPP) model in which a prescribing psychologist is embedded in a primary care clinic. This article describes the model and provides indications of its strengths and weaknesses as reported by medical providers who have utilized the model for the past 2 years. A brief history of prescribing psychology and the challenges surrounding granting psychologists the authority to prescribe psychotropic medication is summarized. Results indicate family medicine providers agree that having a prescribing psychologist embedded in the family medicine clinic is helpful to their practice, safe for patients, convenient for providers and for patients, and improves patient care. Potential benefits of integrating prescribing psychology into primary care are considered and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP). (1998). DoD prescribing psychologists: External analysis, monitoring, and evaluation of the program and its participants. Nashville, TN: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1996). Recommended postdoctoral training in psychopharmacology for prescription privileges. Washington, DC: Author.

  • American Psychological Association Council of Representatives. (2009). Recommended postdoctoral education and training program in psychopharmacology for prescriptive authority. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, R. S., Gardocki, G. J., Larson, D. B., & Hidalgo, J. (1988). Prescribing of psychotropic medication by primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1117–1119. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800360065009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blount, A. (2003). Integrated primary care: Organizing the evidence. Families, Systems and Health, 21, 121–133. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.21.2.121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blount, A., Shoenbaum, M., Kathol, R., Rollman, B. L., Thomas, M., O’Donohue, W., et al. (2007). The economics of behavioral health services in medical settings: A summary of the evidence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 290–297. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlat, D. J. (2010). The case for prescribing psychologists. National Psychologist, 19, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNelsky, G. Y. (1996). The case against prescription privileges for psychologists. American Psychologist, 51, 207–212. doi:10.1037//0735-7028.22.3.188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Army. (2009). Policy and procedures for credentialing and privileging clinical psychologists to prescribe medications. Houston, TX: Author. https://www.us.army.mil/suite/files/21527827. Accessed 8 May 2011.

  • Dozois, D. J. A., & Dobson, K. S. (1995). Should Canadian psychologists follow the APA trend and seek prescription privileges? A reexamination of the revolution. Canadian Psychology, 36, 288–304. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.36.4.288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federation of Texas Psychiatry. (2009). Public policy: Psychologists prescribing. Retrieved 5 Dec 2011 from: http://www.txpsych.org/publicpolicy.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2011.

  • Fries, J., Koop, C., & Beadle, C. (1993). Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 321–325. doi:10.1056/NEJM199307293290506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO). (1997). Defense health care: Need for more prescribing psychologists is not adequately justified (GAO/HEHS-97-83). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO). (1999). Prescribing psychologists: DOD demonstration participants perform well but have little effect on readiness or costs (GAO-HEHS-99-98). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1995). Using behavioral science to control guild excesses. Clinical Behavior Analyst, 1, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiby, E. M. (2002). It is time for a moratorium on legislation enabling prescription privileges for psychologists. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 256–258. doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiby, E. M. (2010). Concerns about substandard training for prescription privileges for psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 104–111. doi:10.1002/jclp.20650.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. L., Goodie, J. L., Oordt, M. S., & Dobmeyer, A. C. (2009). Integrated behavioral health in primary care: Step by step guidance for assessment and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11871-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laskow, G. B., & Grill, D. J. (2003). The Department of Defense Experiment: The Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project. In M. T. Sammons, R. U. Paige, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A history and guide (pp. 77–101). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10484-005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, K. L., & Barone, S. (2006). Prescription privileges for psychologists: A comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies. CNS Drugs, 20, 51–66. doi:10.2165/00023210-200620010-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, E. S., & Foster, E. O. (2010). Integration of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy by prescribing-medical psychologists: A psychobiosocial model of care. In R. E. McGrath & B. A. Moore (Eds.), Pharmacotherapy for psychologists: Prescribing and collaborative roles (pp. 173–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12167-000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, J. B., Martin, C. E., & Pearson, J. L. (2002). Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: A review of the evidence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 909–916. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, T. L., Levit, K. R., & Buck, J. A. (2009). Psychotropic drug prescriptions by medical specialty. Psychiatric Services, 60, 1167. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.9.1167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2010). Prescriptive authority for psychologists. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 21–47. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090209-151448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., & Muse, M. (2010). Room for a new standard? Response to comments by Heiby. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 112–115. doi:10.1002/jclp.20658.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., & Sammons, M. (2011). Prescribing and primary care psychology: Complementary paths for professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42, 113–120. doi:10.1037/a0022649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). (2007). Patient-centered medical home. In recognition programs. Retrieved 5 Dec 2011, from http://www.ncqa.org/.

  • Newman, R., Phelps, R., Sammons, M. T., Dunivin, D. L., & Cullen, E. A. (2000). Evaluation of the Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project: A retrospective analysis. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 31, 598–603. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.6.598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, B. (2003). Fool’s gold: Psychologists using disingenuous reasoning to mislead legislatures into granting psychologists prescriptive authority. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 29, 489–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. A., Brody, D. J., & Qiuping, G. (2011). Antidepressant use in persons aged 12 and over: United States, 2005–2008. National Center for Health Statistics. NCHS Data Brief No. 76.

  • Psychologists Opposed to Prescribing Privileges for Psychologists (POPPP). (2007). http://psychologistsopposedtoprescribingbypsychologists.org. Accessed 5 Feb 2011.

  • Robiner, W. N., Bearman, D. L., Berman, M., Grove, W. M., Colon, E., Armstrong, J., et al. (2002). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A looming health hazard? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 231–248. doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. J., & Reiter, J. T. (2007). Behavioral consultation and primary care: A guide to integrating services. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-32973-4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, M. T. (2010). The Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project: What did it teach us, and where are we now? In R. E. McGrath & B. A. Moore (Eds.), Pharmacotherapy for psychologists: Prescribing and collaborative roles (pp. 49–67). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12167-000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, M. T., & Brown, A. B. (1997). The Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project: An evolving program for postdoctoral education in psychology. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 28, 107–112. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.28.2.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strosahl, K., & Robinson, P. (2008). The primary care behavioral health model: Applications to prevention, acute care and chronic condition management. In R. Keesler & U. D. Stafford (Eds.), Collaborative medicine case studies: Evidence in practice (pp. 85–95). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76894-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. B., & Heiby, E. E. (2007). To prescribe or not to prescribe: Eleven exploratory questions. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 5, 4–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, Pub. L. no 111–148, 124 Stat. 199 through 124 Stat. 1025.

  • Van Winkle, K. A. (2010). Prescription privileges for non-MDs: A retrospective look at the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Project and its influence on the profession of psychology (Psychology Issues). Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association. American Psychoanalytic Association. Retrieved 5 Dec 2011, from HighBeam Research http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-233501754.html.

  • Vector Research. (1996). Cost-effectiveness and feasibility of the DOD Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project, Final Report. Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Health (WSDH) Health Systems Quality Assurance. (2010). Who can prescribe and administer Rx in Washington State? http://www.doh.wa.gov/hsqa/professions/documents/PrescribingAuthority.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Shearer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shearer, D.S., Harmon, S.C., Seavey, B.M. et al. The Primary Care Prescribing Psychologist Model: Medical Provider Ratings of the Safety, Impact and Utility of Prescribing Psychology in a Primary Care Setting. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 19, 420–429 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9338-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9338-8

Keywords

Navigation