Skip to main content
Log in

Almost separable matrices

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An \(m\times n\) matrix \(\mathsf {A}\) with column supports \(\{S_i\}\) is k-separable if the disjunctions \(\bigcup _{i \in \mathcal {K}} S_i\) are all distinct over all sets \(\mathcal {K}\) of cardinality k. While a simple counting bound shows that \(m > k \log _2 n/k\) rows are required for a separable matrix to exist, in fact it is necessary for m to be about a factor of k more than this. In this paper, we consider a weaker definition of ‘almost k-separability’, which requires that the disjunctions are ‘mostly distinct’. We show using a random construction that these matrices exist with \(m = O(k \log n)\) rows, which is optimal for \(k = O(n^{1-\beta })\). Further, by calculating explicit constants, we show how almost separable matrices give new bounds on the rate of nonadaptive group testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge M, Baldassini L, Johnson O (2014) Group testing algorithms: bounds and simulations. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 60(6):3671–3687

  • Atia GK, Saligrama V (2012) Boolean compressed sensing and noisy group testing. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 58(3):1880–1901

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassini L, Johnson O, Aldridge M (2013) The capacity of adaptive group testing. In: IEEE international symposium on information theory proceedings, pp 2676–2680

  • Chan CL, Jaggi S, Saligrama V, Agnihotri S (2014) Non-adaptive group testing: explicit bounds and novel algorithms. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 60(5):3019–3035

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H-B, Hwang FK (2007) Exploring the missing link among \(d\)-separable, \(\overline{d}\)-separable and \(d\)-disjunct matrices. Discret Appl Math 155(5):662–664

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman R (1943) The detection of defective members of large populations. Ann Math Stat 14(4):436–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du D-Z, Hwang FK (2000) Combinatorial group testing and applications, 2nd edn., Series on applied mathematics, World Scientific, Singapore

  • D’yachkov AG, Vorob’ev IV, Polyansky NA, Shchukin VY (2014a) Bounds on the rate of disjunctive codes. Prov Inf Transm 50(1):27–56

  • D’yachkov AG, Vorobyev IV, Polyanskii NA, Shchukin VY (2014b) Almost disjunctive list-decoding codes. arXiv:1407.2482

  • D’yachkov AG, Rykov VV (1982) Bounds on the length of disjunctive codes. Probl Inf Transm 18(3):166–171

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erdős P, Moser L (1970) Problem 35. In: Proceedings on the conference of combinatorial structures and their applications, Gordon and Breach

  • Füredi Z (1996) On \(r\)-cover-free families. J Comb Theo A 73(1):172–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kautz WH, Singleton RC (1964) Nonrandom binary superimposed codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theor 10(4):363–377

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Macula A, Rykov V, Yekhanin S (2004) Trivial two-stage group testing for complexes using almost disjunct matrices. Discret Appl Math 137(1):97–107

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malioutov D, Malyutov M (2012) Boolean compressed sensing: Lp relaxation for group testing. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 3305–3308

  • Malyutov MB (1978) The separating property of random matrices. Math Notes Acad Sci USSR 23(1):84–91

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malyutov M (2013) Search for sparse active inputs: a review. In: Aydinian H, Cicalese F, Deppe C (eds) Information theory, combinatorics and search theory, vol 7777, Lecture notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp 609–647

  • Mazumdar A (2012) On almost disjunct matrices for group testing. Algorithms Comput 7676:649–658

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Porat E, Rothschild A (2008) Explicit non-adaptive combinatorial group testing schemes. In: Aceto L, Damgard I, Goldberg LA, Halldorsson MM, Ingolfsdottir A, Walukiewicz I (Eds), ICALP 2008, vol 5125, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 748–759

  • Ruszinkó M (1994) On the upper bound of the size of \(r\)-cover-free families. J Comb Theo A 66(2):302–310

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett J, Cevher V (2015a) Limits on support recovery with probabilistic models: an information-theoretic framework, arXiv:1501.07440

  • Scarlett J, Cevher V (2015b) Phase transitions in group testing, http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/206886/files/GroupTesting_SODA.pdf

  • Sebő A (1985) On two random search problems. J Stat Plan Inference 11(1):23–31

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sejdinovic D, Johnson OT (2010) Note on noisy group testing: asymptotic bounds and belief propagation reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual allerton conference on communication, control and computing, 998–1003

  • Wadayama T (2013) An analysis on non-adaptive group testing based on sparse pooling graphs. In: IEEE international symposium on information theory, 2681-2685

  • Zhigljavsky A (2003) Probabilistic existence theorems in group testing. J Stat Plan Inference 115(1):1–43

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

At the time the research was carried out, the authors were with the School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, and M. Aldridge and K. Gunderson were also with the Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research, Bristol, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Aldridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldridge, M., Baldassini, L. & Gunderson, K. Almost separable matrices. J Comb Optim 33, 215–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-015-9951-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-015-9951-1

Keywords

Navigation