Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emerging Paradigm of Primary Immunodeficiency Disease: Individualizing Immunoglobulin Dose and Delivery to Enhance Outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Immunology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An emerging paradigm for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) with immunoglobulin (IgG) replacement therapy emphasizes the tailoring of treatments to each patient with the goal of preventing infections and minimizing side effects. Increasing evidence shows that the IgG dose needed to prevent infection varies with each patient, and both intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IGSC) have emerged as feasible modes of delivery. Although IGIV is currently the routine treatment, IGSC is increasingly being chosen as the preferred route of delivery due to greater flexibility and reduced side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonilla FA, Bernstein IL, Khan DA, Ballas ZK, Chinen J, Frank MM, et al. Practice parameter for the diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94(5 Suppl 1):S1–S63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucas M, Lee M, Lortan J, Lopez-Granadas E, Misbah S, Chapel H. Infection outcomes in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders: relationship to immunoglobulin therapy over 22 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(6):1354–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orange JS, Grossman WJ, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Impact of trough IgG on pneumonia incidence in primary immunodeficiency: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Clin Immunol. 2010;137:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Orange JS, Belohradsky BH, Berger M, Borte M, Hagan J, Jolles S, et al. Evaluation of correlation between dose and clinical outcomes in subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;169(2):172–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonagura VR, Marchlewski R, Cox A, Rosenthal DW. Biologic IgG level in primary immunodeficiency disease: the IgG level that protects against recurrent infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:210–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger M. A history of immune globulin therapy, from the Harvard Crash Program to monoclonal antibodies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2002;2:368–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. FDA. Summary basis for approval: immune globulin intravenous (human), 10% solution (Gammagard Liquid). 2004. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/bloodbloodproducts/approvedproducts/licensedproductsblas/fractionatedplasmaproducts/ucm224271.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.

  8. Quinti I, Soresina A, Guerra A, Rondelli R, Spadaro G, Agostini C, et al. Effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy on clinical outcome in patients with primary antibody deficiencies: results from a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Clin Immunol. 2011;31(3):315–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasserman RL, Zidik J. Clinical utility of biweekly dosing with high concentration subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency: retrospective case series. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology; Nov. 7–11, 2013; Baltimore, MD.

  10. Skoda-Smith S, Torgerson TR, Ochs HD. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010;6:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Goddard EA. Intravenous immunoglobulin. Curr Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;21(1):26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Immune Deficiency Foundation Patient Survey. Treatment experiences and preferences among patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases national survey of patients. 2008. Immune Deficiency Foundation. Available at: http://primaryimmune.org/idf-survey-research-center/idf-surveys. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.

  13. Schiff RI, Sedlak D, Buckley RH. Rapid infusion of Sandoglobulin in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;88:61–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grillo JA, Gorson KC, Ropper AH, Lewis J, Weinstein R. Rapid infusion of intravenous immune globulin in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Neurology. 2001;57:1699–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wasserman RL, Church JA, Stein M, Moy J, White M, Strausbaugh S, et al. Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a new 10 % liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(4):663–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dashti-Khavidaki S, Aghamohammadi A, Farshadi F, Movahedi M, Parvaneh N, Pouladi N, et al. Adverse reactions of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin; a 13-year experience with 3004 infusions in Iranian patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19(2):139–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ballow M, Notarangelo L, Grimbacher B, Cunningham-Rundles C, Stein M, Helbert M, et al. Immunodeficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;158 Suppl 1:14–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR, Ballow M, Berger M, Bonilla FA, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease. A review of evidence by members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:S525–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fakhouri F. Intravenous immunoglobulins and acute renal failure: mechanism and prevention. Rev Med Interne. 2007;28 Spec No.1:4–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paran D, Herishanu Y, Elkayam O, Shopin L, Ben-Ami R. Venous and arterial thrombosis following administration of intravenous immunoglobulins. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005;16(5):313–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kemmotsu Y, Nakayama T, Matsuura H, Saji T. Clinical characteristics of aseptic meningitis induced by intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2011;9:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohrbach H, Katz U, Sherer Y, Shoenfeld Y. Intravenous immunoglobulin: adverse effects and safe administration. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005;29(3):173–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chapman SA, Gilkerson KL, Davin TD, Pritzker MR. Acute renal failure and intravenous immune globulin: occurs with sucrose-stabilized, but not with D-sorbitol-stabilized, formulation. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(12):2059–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vo AA, Cam V, Toyoda M, Puliyanda DP, Lukovsky M, Bunnapradist S, et al. Safety and adverse events profiles of intravenous gammaglobulin products used for immunomodulation: a single-center experience. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(4):844–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boros P, Gondolesi G, Bromberg JS. High dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment: mechanisms of action. Liver Transpl. 2005;11(12):1469–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasan A. Reducing adverse reactions in home IVIG administration. Infusion. 2012. Available at: http://onlinedigeditions.com/display_article.php?id=1018713. Accessed 17 Oct 2013.

  27. Wasserman RL, Irani AM, Tracy J, Tsoukas C, Stark D, Levy R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous immune globulin (human), 10 % caprylate/chromatography purified in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;161:518–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fasth A, Nyström J. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous human immunoglobulin in children with primary immunodeficiency. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(10):1474–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rand KH, Gibbs K, Derendorf H, Graham-Pole J. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin (Gammagard) in bone marrow transplant patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;31(12):1151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Borte M, Quinti I, Soresina A, Fernández-Cruz E, Ritchie B, Schmidt DS, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous Vivaglobin® replacement therapy in previously untreated patients with primary immunodeficiency: a prospective, multicenter study. J Clin Immunol. 2011;31(6):952–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. GAMMAGARD LIQUID (Immune Globulin Intravenous [Human]), 10 % solution, for intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Prescribing information. Westlake Village, CA: Baxter Healthcare Corporation; 2012.

  32. Vivaglobin (Immune Globulin Subcutaneous [Human]), 16 % liquid. Prescribing information. King of Prussia, PA: CSL Behring LLC; Rev. April 2010.

  33. Hizentra (Immune Globulin Subcutaneous [Human]), 20 % liquid. Prescribing information. King of Prussia, PA: CSL Behring LLC; Rev. Oct. 2011.

  34. Kobrynski L. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy: a new option for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Biologics. 2012;6:277–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Dr Shapiro is an advisor and principal investigator for Baxter and CSL Behring, and a principal investigator for Viropharma and Kedrion. Dr Wasserman is a principal investigator for IgG studies for Baxter, Biotest, Korean Green Cross, Kedrion, and ADMA. He also is a consultant for ADMA, BPL, Biotest, and Baxter, and a speaker for Baxter and CSL Behring. Dr Bonagura has no conflict of interest. Dr Gupta has served as a consultant to Baxter and as a speaker. He has participated or is participating in clinical trials for Baxter, CSL Behring, Octapharma and BPL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph S. Shapiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, R.S., Wasserman, R.L., Bonagura, V. et al. Emerging Paradigm of Primary Immunodeficiency Disease: Individualizing Immunoglobulin Dose and Delivery to Enhance Outcomes. J Clin Immunol 37, 190–196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-9990-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-014-9990-x

Keywords

Navigation