Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building and Sustaining Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Adaptivity and Job Satisfaction

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose was to investigate how job satisfaction and adaptivity influence proactivity over time. Proactivity describes employees’ efforts to initiate positive change in the organization and can be differentiated from adaptivity: the positive behavioral response to ongoing change. We investigated how adaptivity supports subsequent proactivity and how job satisfaction can be a motivational resource for maintaining high levels of proactivity over time.

Design/Methodology/Approach

We surveyed 75 employees on two occasions separated by a period of 2 years.

Findings

Our findings provide initial support for the role of adaptivity in facilitating proactivity over time. Highly satisfied employees maintained their level of proactivity, whether high or low, over the 2-year period. Employees low in job satisfaction who showed high levels of proactive behavior at Time 1 did not report high levels of proactive behavior at Time 2.

Implications

In uncertain environments, organizations rely on their employees to support and promote change and innovation. Our results suggest that high adaptivity can build proactivity, while high satisfaction can sustain proactivity.

Originality/Value

Distinguishing adaptivity from proactivity provides a better understanding of the nature of proactivity in organizations. Inconsistent results concerning the link between satisfaction and proactivity are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., Jimmieson, N. L., & Calan, V. L. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of coping processes during a merger: Implications of job satisfaction and organizational identification. Journal of Management, 32(4), 552–574. doi:10.1177/0149206306287542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 23–57. doi:10.2307/2393590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C. M., Wall, T. D., Stride, C., Pepper, K., Clegg, C., Gardner, P., et al. (2002). Familiarity breeds content: The impact of exposure to change on employee openness and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(2), 217–231. doi:10.1348/09631790260098596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68. doi:10.1002/job.179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational-behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. doi:10.1002/job.4030140202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Valcea, S., & Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 325–345. doi:10.1348/096317910X493134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgement effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 475–481. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. doi:10.1177/014920630002600304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736. doi:10.2307/3069412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology—The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63. doi:10.2307/256630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084–1102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94–111. doi:10.1177/0149206307308911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.2.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghitulescu, B. E. (2013). Making change happen: The impact of work context on adaptive and proactive behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), 206–245. doi:10.1177/0021886312469254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A., & Abrahamson, E. (1991). Champions of change and strategic shifts: The role of internal and external change advocates. Journal of Management Studies, 28(2), 173–190. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00276.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 31–55. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174–182. doi:10.1037/a0017263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 123–143. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organization Dynamics, 19(1), 40–55. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(90)90047-S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2001). Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: Key predictors of project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 15–27. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1810015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–53). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984–996. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A. (1993). Does affective disposition moderate the relationship between job satisfaction and voluntary turnover? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 395–401. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.3.395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 107–122. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.84.1.107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., & Gundy, L. K. (2002). Prospecting for strategic advantage: The proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(2), 85–97. doi:10.1111/1540-627X.00042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki, A. K., McKee, F. M., & Wade, K. J. (1996). Annual review, 1991–1995: Occupational health. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(2), 190–220. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, S., De Reu, T., & Frese, M. (2000). Sociodemographic factors, entrepreneurial orientation, personal initiative and environmental problems in Uganda. In M. Frese (Ed.), Success and failure of microbusiness owners in Africa: A psychological approach (pp. 55–76). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., & Van Linn, D. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52–65. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marques-Quinteiro, P., & Curral, L. A. (2012). Goal orientation and work role performance: Predicting adaptive and proactive work role performance through self-leadership strategies. The Journal of Psychology, 146(6), 559–577. doi:10.1080/00223980.2012.656157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. doi:10.2307/257011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. doi:10.1177/0149206310363732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299–323. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154–1162. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. (2010). The impact of change process and context on change reactions and turnover during a merger. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1309–1338. doi:10.1177/0149206309341480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 518–528. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00185.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5–37. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoss, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 910–924. doi:10.1002/job.780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. P., Shane, G. S., & Kennedy, K. A. (1990). Effects of social-system factors on absenteeism, turnover, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(4), 423–430. doi:10.1007/BF01013605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230–240. doi:10.1037/a0032141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R. (1990). Development of control-related beliefs, goals, and styles in childhood and adolescence: A clinical perspective. In J. Rodin, C. Schooler, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Self-directedness: Cause and effects throughout the life course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zempel, J. (1999). Selbständigkeit in den neuen Bundesländern. In K. Moser, B. Batinic, & J. Zempel (Eds.), Unternehmerisch erfolgreiches Handeln. Göttingen: Verlag für angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Social Studies Building, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

    Karoline Strauss

  2. School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Mark A. Griffin

  3. Uwa Business School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Sharon K. Parker

  4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Claire M. Mason

Authors
  1. Karoline Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark A. Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharon K. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Claire M. Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strauss, K., Griffin, M.A., Parker, S.K. et al. Building and Sustaining Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Adaptivity and Job Satisfaction. J Bus Psychol 30, 63–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9334-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9334-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation