Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Social networking websites such as Facebook allow employers to gain information about applicants which job seekers may not otherwise share during the hiring process. This multi-study investigation examined how job seekers react to this screening practice.
Study 1 (N = 175) employed a realistic selection scenario examining applicant reactions to prospective employers reviewing their social networking website. Study 2 (N = 208) employed a simulated selection scenario where participants rated their experience with a proposed selection process.
In Study 1, social networking website screening caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, which ultimately resulted in lower organizational attraction. Applicants low in agreeableness had the most adverse reactions to social networking website screening. In Study 2, screening again caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, resulting in lower organizational attraction and increased intentions to litigate. The organization’s positive/negative hiring decision did not moderate the relationship between screening and justice.
The results suggest organizations should consider the costs and benefits of social media screening which could reduce the attractiveness of the organization. Additionally, applicants may need to change their conceptualization of social networking websites, viewing them through the eyes of a prospective employer.
This investigation proposed and tested an explanatory model of the effects of screening practices on organizational outcomes demonstrating how electronic monitoring, privacy, and applicant reactions can be integrated to better understand responses to technological innovations in the workplace.
- Aguinis, H (1995) Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management 21: pp. 1141-1158
- Aguinis, H, Stone-Romero, EF (1997) Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology 82: pp. 192-206 CrossRef
- Alder, GS, Ambrose, ML (2005) Towards understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research. Human Resource Management Review 15: pp. 43-67 CrossRef
- Alder, GS, Schminke, M, Noel, TW, Kuenzi, M (2007) Employee reactions to internet monitoring: The moderating role of ethical orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 80: pp. 481-498 CrossRef
- Alge, BJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: pp. 797-804 CrossRef
- Alge, BJ, Ballinger, GA, Tangirala, S, Oakley, JL (2006) Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: pp. 221-232 CrossRef
- Allen, DG, Mahto, RV, Otondo, RF (2007) Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a Web site on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology 92: pp. 1696-1708 CrossRef
- Altman, I (1975) The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA
- Barger, T, Behrend, TS, Sharek, DJ, Sinar, EF (2011) I-O and the crowd: Frequently asked questions about using Mechanical Turk for research. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 49: pp. 11-18
- Barrick, MR, Mount, MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44: pp. 1-26 CrossRef
- Baruch, Y, Holtom, BC (2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations 61: pp. 1139-1160 CrossRef
- Bauer, TN, Truxillo, DM, Sanchez, RJ, Craig, JM, Ferrara, P, Campion, MA (2001) Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology 54: pp. 387-419 CrossRef
- Behrend, TS, Sharek, DJ, Meade, AW, Wiebe, EN (2011) The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods 43: pp. 800-813 CrossRef
- Brockner, J, Wiesenfeld, BM (1996) An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120: pp. 189-208 CrossRef
- Brown, VR, Vaughn, ED (2011) The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology 26: pp. 219-225 CrossRef
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. (USDL Publication No. 05-1433). Washington, DC.
- CareerBuilder.com. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use networking sites to research job candidates, CareerBuilder survey finds. CareerBuilder.com. Retrieved January 20, 2010, from http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr519&sd=8/19/2009&ed=12/31/2009&siteid=cbpr&sc_cmp1=cb_pr519_&cbRecursionCnt=3&cbsid=0c13dc78541544338f04998d7c0dd165-317523116-JD-5.
- Chen, JV, Ross, WH (2007) Individual differences and electronic monitoring at work. Information, Communication & Society 10: pp. 488-505 CrossRef
- Cohen, J (1988) Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
- Colquitt, J (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: pp. 386-400 CrossRef
- Davison, HK, Maraist, C, Bing, MN (2011) Friend or foe? The promise and pitfalls of using social networking sites for HR decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology 26: pp. 153-159 CrossRef
- Ducklin, P. (2009). Sophos Australia Facebook ID probe 2009. Sophos.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://www.sophos.com/blogs/duck/g/2009/12/06/facebook-id-probe-2009/.
- Duffy, E. (2006, November 1). Employers use Facebook in hiring process. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/2.2754/employers-use-facebook-in-hiring-process-1.263806.
- Eddy, ER, Stone, DL, Stone-Romero, EE (1999) The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology 52: pp. 335-358 CrossRef
- Ellison, NB, Steinfield, C, Lampe, C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12: pp. 1143-1168 CrossRef
- Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Lang, A-G, Buchner, A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39: pp. 175-191 CrossRef
- Finder, A. (2006, June 11). When a risqué online persona undermines a chance for a job. The New York Times, p. A1.
- Gamliel, E, Peer, E (2009) Effect of framing on applicants’ reactions to personnel Selection Methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17: pp. 282-289 CrossRef
- Gilliland, SW (1993) The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review 18: pp. 694-734
- Goldberg, LR A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde, I, Deary, I, Fruyt, F, Ostendorf, F eds. (1999) Personality Psychology in Europe. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp. 7-28
- Goldberg, S. (2010). Young job-seekers hiding their Facebook pages. CNN.com. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/29/facebook.job-seekers/index.html.
- Goldman, BM (2001) Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology 54: pp. 361-386 CrossRef
- Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the Facebook case). Paper presented at ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) (pp. 71–80). doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214.
- Hausknecht, JP, Day, DV, Thomas, SC (2004) Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 57: pp. 639-683 CrossRef
- Highhouse, S, Lievens, F, Sinar, EF (2003) Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63: pp. 986-1001 CrossRef
- Hu, L, Bentler, P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6: pp. 1-55 CrossRef
- Kluemper, DH, Rosen, PA, Mossholder, KW (2012) Social networking websites, personality ratings, and the organizational context: More than meets the eye?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42: pp. 1143-1172 CrossRef
- Kolb, KJ, Aiello, JR (1996) The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable. Computers in Human Behavior 12: pp. 407-423 CrossRef
- Leventhal, GS What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen, K, Greenberg, M, Willis, R eds. (1980) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, NY, pp. 27-88 CrossRef
- Levinson, M. (2009). Job seekers to employers: Stop snooping! CIO. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://advice.cio.com/meridith_levinson/job_seekers_to_employers_stop_snooping.
- Levinson, M. (2011). Social networks: New hotbed for hiring discrimination claims. Computer World. Retrieved June 11, 2011, from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215907/Social_Networks_New_Hotbed_for_Hiring_Discrimination_Claims.
- Lorenzen-Huber, L, Boutain, M, Camp, LJ, Shankar, K, Connelly, KH (2010) Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International 36: pp. 232-252 CrossRef
- Margulis, ST (2003) Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues 59: pp. 243-261 CrossRef
- McNichol, T. (2010). The gathering storm of social network litigation. HRO Today, 9(10). Retrieved from http://www.hrotoday.com/content/4756/gathering-storm-social-network-litigation.
- Murphy, KR (1986) When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychological Bulletin 99: pp. 133-138 CrossRef
- Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO (2007) Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA
- National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2006). More than one quarter of organizations have Goggled job candidates profiles. National Association of Colleges and Employers. Retrieved December 08, 2007, from http://www.naceweb.org/press/display.asp?year=2006&prid=240.
- Palank, J. (2006, July 17). Face it: “Book” no secret to employers; social sites used as background check. The Washington Times, p. A01.
- Ployhart, RE, Ryan, AM (1997) Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72: pp. 308-335 CrossRef
- Ployhart, RE, Ryan, AM (1998) Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: pp. 3-16 CrossRef
- Raciot, BM, Williams, KJ (1993) Perceived invasiveness and fairness of drug-testing procedures for current employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23: pp. 1879-1891 CrossRef
- Ryan, AM, Greguras, GJ, Ployhart, RE (1997) Perceived job relatedness of physical abilities testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions. Human Performance 9: pp. 219-240 CrossRef
- Rynes, S. L. (1993). Who’s selecting whom? Effects of selection practices on applicant attitudes and behavior. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 240–274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Rynes, SL, Bretz, RD, Gerhart, B (1991) The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology 44: pp. 487-521 CrossRef
- Schiffman, L. (2007, November 12). Employers using Facebook information when hiring. North by Northwestern. Retrieved from http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/11/5072/employers-use-facebook-information-when-hiring/.
- Shi, J, Lin, H, Wang, L, Wang, M (2009) Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational justice. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 37: pp. 209-222 CrossRef
- Stanton, J (2000) Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance 13: pp. 85-113 CrossRef
- Stern, J. (2012). Maryland Bill Bans Employers From Facebook Passwords. ABC News. Retrieved April 08, 2013, from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/04/maryland-bill-bans-employers-from-facebook-passwords/.
- Stone-Romero, EF, Stone, DL, Hyatt, D (2003) Personnel selection procedures and invasion of privacy. Journal of Social Issues 59: pp. 343-368 CrossRef
- Stoughton, JW, Thompson, LF, Meade, AW (2013) Big Five personality traits reflected in job applicants’ social media postings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16: pp. 800-805 CrossRef
- Stutzman, F (2006) An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association 3: pp. 10-18
- Tabak, F, Smith, WP (2005) Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 17: pp. 173-189 CrossRef
- Tam, D. (2013). Facebook by the numbers: 1.06 billion monthly active users. C-Net. Retrieved April 12, 2013, from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57566550-93/facebook-by-the-numbers-1.06-billion-monthly-active-users/.
- Tolchinsky, PD, McCuddy, MK, Adams, J, Ganster, DC, Woodman, RW, Fromkin, HL (1981) Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 66: pp. 308-313 CrossRef
- Truxillo, DM, Bauer, TN, Campion, MA, Paronto, ME (2006) A field study of the role of Big Five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14: pp. 269-277 CrossRef
- Turban, DB, Keon, TL (1993) Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: pp. 184-193 CrossRef
- Valdes, M., & McFarland, S. (2012, March 21). Privacy red flag raised as more job applicants asked to turn over Facebook passwords. The Associated Press. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_20218922/privacy-red-flag-raised-more-job-applicants-asked.
- Vandenberg, R (2011) Call for papers: Feature topic: Research design. Organizational Research Methods 14: pp. 581-582 CrossRef
- Westin, AF (1967) Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New York, NY
- Wiehl, L. (2008). The law behind hiring practices and the social networking website Facebook. Foxnews.com. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331970,00.html.
- Wortham, J. (2009). More employers use social networks to check out applicants. NYTimes.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/more-employers-use-social-networks-to-check-out-applicants/.
- Zweig, D, Webster, J (2003) Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 19: pp. 479-493 CrossRef
- Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening
Journal of Business and Psychology
Volume 30, Issue 1 , pp 73-88
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Electronic monitoring
- Procedural justice
- Organizational attraction
- Social networking
- Industry Sectors