Abstract
The current study used a single-case design to examine two performance feedback conditions varying in intensity on the frequency of naturalistic math instruction in preschool classrooms during non-instructional times (transition, lunch, free play). Three Head Start teachers received professional development that combined information on four math-oriented milieu teaching strategies (incidental teaching, time delay, mand model, and model), milieu teaching scripts, and goal setting. Teachers then received a feedback package of relatively higher intensity associated with a performance criterion followed by lower-intensity, continued support feedback package. Teachers increased the use of math-oriented milieu teaching strategies and positive attention across intervention conditions. In addition, two of the three teachers evidenced generalization of milieu teaching strategies across contexts and content areas. Results are discussed in terms of conceptualizations of intervention intensity and implications for practice, limitations, and future directions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alber, S. R., & Heward, W. L. (2000). Teaching students to recruit positive attention: A review and recommendations. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 177–204.
Alpert, C. L., & Kaiser, A. P. (1992). Training parents as milieu language teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 31–52.
Barnett, D., Bauer, A., Bell, S., Elliott, N., Haski, H., Barkley, E., et al. (2007a). Preschool intervention scripts: Lessons from 20 years of research and practice. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 158–180.
Barnett, D. W., Hawkins, R., & Lentz, E. F. (2011). Intervention adherence for research and practice: Necessity or triage outcome? Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 21, 175–190.
Barnett, D. W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007b). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31–54.
Benedict, E. A., Horner, R. H., & Squires, J. K. (2007). Assessment and implementation of positive behavior support in preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 27, 174–192.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
Bjorklund, D. F., Hubertz, M. J., & Reubens, A. C. (2004). Young children’s arithmetic strategies in social context: How parents contribute to children’s strategy development while playing games. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 347–357.
Boat, M. B., Carr, V., Barnett, D., Nichols, A., Macmann, G., Moomaw, S., et al. (2009). Instructional change in preschool classrooms: A study of empirically-based teacher support. NHSA Dialog: A Research to Practice Journal for the Early Intervention Field, 12, 307–326.
Casey, A. M., & McWilliam, R. A. (2008). Graphical feedback to increase teachers’ use of incidental teaching. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 251–268.
Christensen-Sandfort, R. J., & Whinnery, S. B. (2012). Impact of milieu teaching on communication skills of young children with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 32, 1–12.
Codding, R. S., & Smyth, C. A. (2008). Using performance feedback to decrease classroom transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 325–345.
Dinehart, L. H. B., Kaiser, M. Y., & Hughes, C. R. (2009). Language delay and the effect of milieu teaching on children born cocaine exposed: A pilot study. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 9–22.
Fey, M. E., Warren, S. F., Brady, N., Finestack, L. H., Bredin-Oja, S., Fairchild, M., et al. (2006). Early effects of responsivity education/prelinguistic milieu teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 526–547.
Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Training day care staff to facilitate children’s language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(3), 299–311.
Greenberg, A. L., Tomaino, M. E., & Charlop, M. H. (2014). Adapting the picture exchange communication system to elicit vocalizations in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 35–51.
Gresham, F. M. (2009). Evolution of the treatment integrity concept: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 38, 533–540.
Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: ACSD.
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher “math talk”. Developmental Psychology, 42, 59–69.
LeFevre, J., Skwarchuk, S., Smith-Chant, B., Fast, L., & Kamawar, D. (2009). Home numeracy experience and children’s math performance in early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 55–66.
Marsicano, R. T. (2013). Increasing math milieu teaching during non-instructional time via a graphical feedback support continuum. Unpublished manuscript.
Miller, C., Collings, B. C., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2002). Using a naturalistic time delay procedure to teach nonverbal adolescents with moderate-to-severe mental disabilities to initiate manual signs. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 247–261.
Nichols, A., & Barnett, D. W. (2004). Teacher instructional and caring contacts research observation code. Unpublished manuscript.
Noell, G. H., & Gansle, K. A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 32–39.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Gilbertson, D. N., Ranier, D. D., & Freeland, J. T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77–88.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., LaFleur, L. H., Mortenson, B. P., Ranier, D. D., & LeVelle, J. (2000). Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: A comparison of two follow-up strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 271–284.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., et al. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11, 655–661.
Solomon, B. G., Klein, S. A., & Politylo, B. C. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers’ treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41, 160–175.
Tirapelle, L., & Cipani, E. (1992). Developing functional requesting: Acquisition, durability, and generalization of effects. Exceptional Children, 58, 260–269.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to extend a special thanks to Dr. David W. Barnett for his guidance throughout the study and contributions to the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is based on the Richard T. Marsicano dissertation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsicano, R.T., Morrison, J.Q., Moomaw, S.C. et al. Increasing Math Milieu Teaching by Varying Levels of Consultation Support: An Example of Analyzing Intervention Strength. J Behav Educ 24, 112–132 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9200-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9200-1