Abstract
This study examined general education teachers’ implementation of a peer tutoring intervention for five elementary students referred for consultation and intervention due to academic concerns. Treatment integrity was assessed via permanent products produced by the intervention. Following verbal instructions, intervention implementation by four teachers was consistently low or exhibited a downward trend whereas one teacher’s moderate implementation co-occurred with student gains. When classroom training was conducted with four teachers exhibiting low integrity, all teachers improved implementation. After accurately implementing the intervention for three training sessions with classroom training, response dependent performance feedback was provided when teachers independently used the intervention below 100% integrity, as determined by review of permanent products. With response dependent performance feedback, three of the four teachers implemented the intervention at levels above the verbal training performance, whereas implementation for one teacher increased following discussion of an upcoming school team meeting. Student math scores improved during intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 3–29.
Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1985). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 65–89.
Bentz, J., Shinn, M.R., & Gleason, M. M. (1990). Training general education pupils to monitor reading using curriculum-based measurement procedure. School Psychology Review, 19, 23–32.
Erenberg, S. R. (1995). An investigation of the heuristic strategies used by student with and without learning disabilities in their acquisition of the basic facts of multiplication. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 9–12.
Fowler, S.A. (1986). Peer-monitoring and self-monitoring: Alternatives to traditional teacher management. Exceptional Children, 52, 573–581.
Fox, J., Shores, R., Lindeman, D., & Strain, P. (1986). Maintaining social initiations of withdrawn handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers through a response-dependent fading tactic. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 387–396.
Gresham, F.M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
LaFleur, L., Witt J. C., Naquin, G., Harwell, V., & Gilbertson D. (1998) Use of coaching to enhance classroom management by improvement of student transitioning between classroom activities. Effective School Practices, 17, 79–82.
Martens, B. K., Hiralall, A. S., & Bradley, T. A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 33–41.
Mortenson, B. P., & Witt, J. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of an academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 2, 613–627.
Noell, G. H., Duhon, G. J., Gatti, S. L., & Connell, J. E. (2002a). Consultation, follow-up, and implementation of behavior management interventions in general education. School Psychology Review, 31, 217–234.
Noell, G. H., Gresham, F. M., & Gansle, K. A. (2002b). Does treatment integrity matter? A preliminary investigation of instructional implementation and mathematics performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 51–67.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Gilbertson, D., Ranier, D. D., & Freeland, J. T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77–88.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., LaFleur, L.H., Mortenson, B. P., Rainer, D. D., & LeVelle, J. (2000). Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: A comparison of two follow-up strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 271–284.
Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., & Duhon, G. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
Northup, J., Fisher, W., Kahang, S. W., & Harrell, R. (1997). An assessment of the necessary strength of behavioral treatments for severe behavior problems. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 1–16.
Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skill problems direct assessment and interventions (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford School Practitioner Series Press.
Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st Century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485–501.
Sheridan, S. M., Meegan, S. P., & Eagle, J. W. (2002). Assessing the social context in initial conjoint behavioral consultation interviews: An exploratory analysis investigating processes and outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 299–324.
Sterling-Turner, H. E., Watson, S. T., & Moore, J. W. (2002). The effects of direct training and treatment integrity on treatment outcomes in school consultation. School Psychology Review, 17, 47–77.
Wickstrom K. F., Jones, K. M., LaFleur L. H., & Witt, J. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141–154.
Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers’ judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204–209.
Witt, J. C., Noell, G. H., LaFleur, L. H., & Mortenson, B. P. (1997). Increasing teacher usage of interventions in general education setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 693–696.
Witt, J., VanDer Heyden, A., & Gilbertson. D. (2004) Troubleshooting behavioral interventions: A systematic process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363–383.
VanDer Heyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 15–31.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 6, 99–114.
Zins, J. E., & Erchul, P. E. (1995). Best practices in school consultation. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practice in school psychology III (pp. 609–623). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilbertson, D., Witt, J.C., Singletary, L.L. et al. Supporting teacher use of interventions: effects of response dependent performance feedback on teacher implementation of a math intervention. J Behav Educ 16, 311–326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9043-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9043-0