Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Italian Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Contribution to its Validity and Reliability

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness refers to the ability to be aware of and attentive to internal and external events, without becoming overwhelmed or feeling the need to react automatically. Recent studies indicate that this ability is associated with the following factors: mental health, psychological functioning, and stress reduction. Although questionnaires have been developed to measure mindfulness, so far these have not been adapted for use within the Italian population. Thus, the aim of our studies was to investigate the reliability and validity of an Italian version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al. Assessment, 13, 27–45, 2006). The FFMQ is a self-report measure that is based on a five-facet model (i.e., Observe, Describe, Act with Awareness, Nonjudge, and Nonreact). In the first study, internal consistency, factor structure, and concurrent validity analyses were carried out on a sample of 559 volunteers. The second study entailed test–retest analyses on a different sample of 43 students. The results showed that the Italian FFMQ: (a) has a similar factor structure to the original English version; (b) has good to excellent internal consistency as a whole (alpha = 0.86) with sub-scale consistency ranging from 0.65 to 0.81, and test–retest stability for the total score being 0.71; (c) has good concurrent validity as demonstrated by significant correlations between the FFMQ scores and a number of self-report measures related to mindfulness. Our findings support both the adaptation of the FFMQ to the Italian context as well as the conceptualization of mindfulness in multi-faceted terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Three records were missing gender information and 3 were missing ages.

  2. Since homoscedasticity could not be assumed, the Welch-Satterthwaite method was used to adjust the degrees of freedom.

  3. According to Nunnally (1978) values of 0.70 or higher are considered acceptable.

References

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Likins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15, 329–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (1993). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale-II: convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. S., Semple, R. J., Pokhrel, P., & Grenard, J. L. (2011). Component processes of executive function-mindfulness, self-control, and working memory and their relationships with mental and behavioral health. Mindfulness, 2, 179–185.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmeijer, E., ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 8, 308–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bränström, R., Kvillemo, P., Brandberg, Y., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2010). Self-report mindfulness as a mediator of psychological well-being in a stress reduction intervention for cancer patients: a randomized study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 151–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bressi, C., Taylor, G. J., Parker, J. D. A., Bressi, S., Brambilla, V., Aguglia, E., et al. (1996). Cross validation of the factor structure of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: an Italian multicenter study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 41, 551–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Vecchione, M. (2007). Big Five Questionnaire—2 (BFQ-2). Firenze: Giunti O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15, 204–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationship between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. S. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing the interrater reliability of specific items in a given inventory. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dekeyser, M., Raes, F., Leijssen, M., Leysen, S., & Dewulf, D. (2008). Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1235–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Liu, X., Rodriguez, M. A., & Xia, C. (2011). The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2, 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C., Hanieh, E., Roberts, R., & Powrie, R. (2012). Mindful pregnancy and childbirth: effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on women’s psychological distress and well-being in the perinatal period. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 15, 139–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farb, N. A., Anderson, A. K., & Segal, Z. V. (2012). The mindful brain and emotion regulation in mood disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S. M., & Greeson, J. M. (2004). Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale. Unpublished.

  • Fernandez, A. C., Wood, M. D., Stein, L. A., & Rossi, J. S. (2010). Measuring mindfulness and examining its relationship with alcohol use and negative consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviour, 24, 608–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossati, A., Feeney, J., Maffei, C., & Borroni, S. (2011). Does mindfulness mediate the association between attachment dimensions and Borderline Personality Disorder features? A study of Italian non-clinical adolescents. Attachment and Human Development, 13, 563–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fossati, A., Vigorelli Porro, F., Maffei, C., & Borroni, S. (2012). Are the DSM-IV personality disorders related to mindfulness? An Italian study on clinical participants. Journal of Clinical Psychology.

  • Geisinger, K. F. (2003). Testing and assessment in cross-cultural psychology. In J. R. Graham, J. A. Naglieri, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 10). Assessment psychology (pp. 95–118). New Jersey: Wiley.

  • Giromini, L., Velotti, P., de Campora, G., Bonalume, L., & Zavattini, G. C. (2012). Cultural adaptation of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: reliability and validity of an Italian version. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(9), 989–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, M., Kopf, S., Kircher, C., Faude-Lang, V., Djuric, Z., Augstein, F., et al. (2012). Sustained effects of a mindfulness-based stress-reduction interventions in type 2 diabetic patients: design and first results of a randomized controlled trial (The Heidelberger Diabetes and Stress-Study). Diabetes Care, 35, 945–947.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., Bissett, R., Luoma, J., & Guerrero, L. F. (2004). DBT, FAP, and ACT: how empirically oriented are the new behaviour therapy technologies? Behavior Therapy, 35, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, A., Douilliezc, C., Pescharda, V., Debrauwerea, L., & Philippota, P. (2011). Cross-cultural validity of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire: adaptation and validation in a French-speaking sample. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliqué, 61, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51 for Windows. Computer software. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioural medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4, 33–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your mind and body to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, D. J., McDermott, K., Malte, C., Martinez, M., & Simpson, T. L. (2012). Association of participation in a mindfulness program with measures of PTSD, depression and quality of life in a veteran sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 101–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Cambridge: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1445–1467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, J. L., Frodi-Lundgren, A., Hanse, J. J., Josefsson, T., Lundh, L. G., Sköld, C., et al. (2011). Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire—reliability and factor structure: a Swedish version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40, 291–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, C. (2008). Mindfulness and mental health: Therapy, theory and science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Pons, M. (1997). The relation of emotional intelligence with selected areas of personal functioning. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 17, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. L., & Farmer, R. F. (2003). The development and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of dissociative activities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 185–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., & Horselenberg, R. (1996). Individual differences in thought suppression. The White Bear Suppression Inventory: factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 34, 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, M. K., & Pidgeon, A. M. (2011). The direct and indirect benefits of dispositional mindfulness on self-esteem and social anxiety. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 24, 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., & Chapman, A. L. (2004). Dialectical behavior therapy: current status, recent developments, and future directions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 73–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, Y., Sato, A., & Ito, Y. (2011). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lee, M. L., & Garssen, B. (2012). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy reduces chronic cancer-related fatigue: a treatment study. Psychooncology, 21, 264–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veehof, M. M., ten Klooster, P. M., Taal, E., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in patients with fibromyalgia. Clinical Rheumatology, 30, 1045–1054.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Caterina Giovannini declares that there is no conflict of interest; Luciano Giromini declares that there is no conflict of interest; Laura Bonalume declares that there is no conflict of interest; Angela Tagini declares that there is no conflict of interest; Margherita Lang declares that there is no conflict of interest; Gherardo Amadei declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

The study protocol and informed consent have been approved by the Institutional Ethic Committee and meets the standards required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caterina Giovannini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giovannini, C., Giromini, L., Bonalume, L. et al. The Italian Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Contribution to its Validity and Reliability. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 36, 415–423 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9403-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9403-0

Keywords

Navigation