Skip to main content
Log in

Ocular biocompatibility of polyquaternium 10 gel: functional and morphological results

  • Biocompatibility Studies
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the characterization study of topical and intraocular biocompatibility and toxicity of cationic hydroxyethylcellulose Polyquaternium 10 (PQ10). It also evaluates the rheological properties of gels. The cytotoxicity assays were done in two cell lines: HEp-2 and VERO (human larynx epidermoid carcinoma cell and African green monkey kidney cells respectively). For the in vivo study, New Zealand albino rabbits were used. The in vitro cytotoxic activity of PQ10 shows no statistically significant differences in relation to the control of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) in any of the cell lines used in this study. Similarly, the signs of inflammation observed after treatment showed no significant difference between the groups of animals treated with the polymer compared to the control group. Normal histological characteristics were seen in both groups with no histological inflammatory reaction. After 1 month of the intracameral application of 2 % PQ10 (treatment group) or 0.3 % HPMC (control group), electroretinograms showed similar levels of a- and b-waves latencies and amplitude. In summary, PQ10 gel was well tolerated in these experiments, with proper monitoring, it could stand as a new alternative in the development of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland TA, Bodde EWH, Baggett LS, Tabata Y, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75:156–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Griffith M, Watsky MA, Forrester JV, Kuffova L, Grant D, Merrett K, Carlsson DJ. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1819–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li M, Mondrinos MJ, Chen X, Gandhi MR, Ko FK, Lelkes PI. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79:963–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, Sakakida S, Taketani S, Kondoh H, Memon IA, Imanishi Y, Shimizu T, Okano T, Matsuda H. Transplantation. 2005;80:1586–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lai JY, Chen KH, Hsu WM, Hsiue GH, Lee YH. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1441–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakai S, Mu C, Kawabata K, Hashimoto I, Kawakami K. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78:394–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsiue GH, Hsu SH, Yang CC, Lee SH, Yang IK. Biomaterials. 2002;23:457–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shim WS, Kim SW, Lee DS. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1935–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo CL, Lin KM, Huang CK, Hsiue GH. Adv Funct Mater. 2006;16:2309–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balazs EA, inventor; Biotrics, Inc, assignee. US PATENT, 4 141 973, 1979.

  11. Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R. Adv Mater. 2006;18(11):1345–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geckil H, Zhang X, Demirci M. Nanomedicine. 2010;5(3):469–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simões S, Figueiras A, Veiga F. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2012;3:185–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosiak JM, Yoshii F. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;151(1–4):56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peppas NA, Khare AR. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1993;11(1–2):1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Nature. 2004;428(6982):487–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Chem Rev. 2001;101(7):1869–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Slaughter BV, Khurshid SS, Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, Peppas NA. Adv Mater. 2009;21(32–33):3307–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreira CA Jr, Moreira AT, Armstrong DK, Jelliffe RW, Woodford CC, Trousdale MD. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69(1):50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guillaumie F, Furrer P, Felt-Baeyens O, Fuhlendorff BL, Nymand S, Westh P, Gurny R, Schwach-Abdellaoui K. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92(4):1421–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madan M, Bajaj A, Lewis S, Udupa N, Baig JA. Indian J Pharm Sc. 2009;71(3):242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arshinoff SA. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goddard ED, Hannan RB. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1977;54:561–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffman H, Kästner U, Donges R, Ehrler R. Polym. Gels Netw. 1996;4:509–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chronakis IS, Alexandridis P. Macromolecules. 2001;34:5005–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gruber J, Kreeger R. Polymeric Materials Encyclopedia, vol. 2. New York: CRC Press; 1996. p. 1113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Annon. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1988;7:335–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez R, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Concheiro A. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56:133–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosmann T. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1–2):55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Akpek EK, Dart JK, Watson S, Christen W, Dursun D, Yoo S, O’Brien TP, Schein OD, Gottsch JD. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:476–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Setala K. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1979;57:1004–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank to Dr. Karina Bierbrauer for technical assistance in rheological studies. Financial support for this study has provided from CEPROCOR and Fundación VER.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dante Miguel Beltramo or José Domingo Luna.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alasino, R.V., Garcia, L.G., Gramajo, A.L. et al. Ocular biocompatibility of polyquaternium 10 gel: functional and morphological results. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 26, 64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5358-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5358-2

Keywords

Navigation