Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructure and compressive properties of carbon microballoons

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon microballoons (CMBs) with tap densities of 0.143, 0.161, and 0.177 g/cm3, as measured per ASTM B 527-93, were characterized in terms of individual balloon diameter, wall thickness, and mechanical behavior in compression through a novel uniaxial compression test technique. This compression test, performed on an MTS Nanoindenter XP II, utilized a flat-ended cylindrical tip rather than the common Berkovich indenter. Quantitative microscopy techniques were used to obtain diameter and wall thickness measurements on the polished cross-sections of individual CMBs that had been cold mounted in epoxy resin. Though there was significant overlap in the three populations, a trend toward increasing average wall thickness—from 1.32 to 2.16 μm—with increasing tap density was observed. Compressive property data including failure load, failure strain, fracture energy, and stiffness were obtained for individual microballoons. Comparison of these data, both inter- and intra-tap density, has yielded some viable trends. CMB failure strain exhibited a dependence upon the inverse square root of the CMB diameter, and CMB failure load depended linearly upon CMB stiffness. Averages for each tap density’s failure load, pseudo-stiffness, and fracture energy were also calculated and observed to increase with tap density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. OKUNO and R. R. WOODHAMS, Cell. Plast. (1973) 8.

  2. H. S. KIM and H. H. OH, Applied Polymer Science 76(2000) 1324 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. GLADYSZ and K. K. CHAWLA, in “Composite Foams, in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science & Technology” (John Wiley, New York, 2004) p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. KOOPMAN, G. GOUADEC, K. CARLISLE, K. K. CHAWLA and G. GLADYSZ, Scripta Materialia 50 (2004) 593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. CARLISLE, K. K. CHAWLA, G. GOUADEC, M. KOOPMAN and G. M. GLADYSZ, in Nanocompressive properties of carbon microballoons and mechanical properties of carbon based syntactic foam composites. in ICCM-14 (San Diego, CA, 2003) Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM D 3102-78: Standard Practice for the Determination of Isostatic Collapse Strength of Hollow Glass Microspheres. American Society for Testing and Materials. (1984).

  7. K. CARLISLE, K. K. CHAWLA, G. GLADYSZ and M. KOOPMAN, J. Mat. Sci. (2006) (this issue).

  8. R. T. DEHOFF and F. N. RHINES (Eds.), in “Quantitative Microscopy” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. ROARK, in Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain edited by W. C. Young (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989)p. 542.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. M. GLADYSZ, B. PERRY, G. MCEACHEN and J. LULA, J. Mat. Sci. (2006) (This issue).

  11. P. W. BRATT, J. P. CUNNION and B. D. SPIVAK, in Mechanical Testing of Glass Hollow Microspheres, in Advances in Materials Characterization edited by D. R. Rossington, R. A. Condrate and R. L. Snyder (New York, Plenum Press, 1983) p. 441.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlisle, K.B., Koopman, M., Chawla, K.K. et al. Microstructure and compressive properties of carbon microballoons. J Mater Sci 41, 3987–3997 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7574-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7574-8

Keywords

Navigation