Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A portfolio optimization model for minimizing soft margin-based generalization bound

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roy’s safety first (RSF) criterion aims to minimize the shortfall probability in portfolio selection. Smoothed safety first portfolio optimization model is a useful tool to realize RSF criterion by minimizing an approximation of the empirical shortfall probability. However, the generalization performance of the smoothed safety first portfolio optimization model may be poor when the number of the samples is finite. In this paper, a soft margin-based generalization bound on the shortfall probability is obtained firstly. Then, a portfolio optimization model is built by minimizing the soft margin-based generalization bound. Finally, the good generalization performance of the portfolio optimization model is verified by experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brezak, D., Majetic, D., Udiljak, T., & Kasac, J. (2012). Tool wear estimation using an analytic fuzzy classifier and support vector machines. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, F. L., Liu, Y. F., & Zhang, W. G. (2014). Generalization bounds of regularization algorithm with Gaussian kernels. Neural Processing Letters, 39(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. C., Wong, H. Y., & Li, D. (2012). Roy’s safety-first portfolio principle in financial risk management of disastrous events. Risk Analysis, 32(11), 1856–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Nogales, F. J., & Uppal, R. (2009). A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Management Science, 55(5), 798–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2009). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, M. R., & Whiteman, C. H. (2008). Generalized safety first and a new twist on portfolio performance. Econometric Reviews, 27(4–6), 457–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, M. R., Paarsch, H. J., & Whiteman, C. H. (2013). Smoothed safety first and the holding of assets. Quantitative Finance, 13(2), 167–176.

  • Haley, M. R. (2014). Gaussian and logistic adaptations of smoothed safety first. Annals of Finance, 10(2), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1972). Safety first-an expected utility principle. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7(3), 1829–1834.

  • Lévy, H., & Lévy, M. (2009). The safety first expected utility model: Experimental evidence and economic implications. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(8), 1494–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. C., Chen, W. C., Liu, C. W., & Lin, Y. S. (2012). A non-linear quality improvement model using SVR for manufacturing TFT-LCDs. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 835–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1999). The early history of portfolio theory: 1600–1960. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(4), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20(3), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawe-Taylor, J. (2002). On the generalization of soft margin algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 48(10), 2721–2735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, M. (2003). Portfolio choice with endogenous utility: A large deviations approach. Journal of Econometrics, 116(1), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y. K., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Ma, M., Ji, D. S., Yang, Q. J., et al. (2014). An improved grid search algorithm and its application in PCA and SVM based face recognition. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 10(3), 1219–1229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 60773062, 61073121), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (Nos. F2012402037, A2012201033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China

    Minghu Ha & Yang Yang

  2. School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, China

    Minghu Ha & Chao Wang

Authors
  1. Minghu Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghu Ha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, M., Yang, Y. & Wang, C. A portfolio optimization model for minimizing soft margin-based generalization bound. J Intell Manuf 28, 759–766 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-1011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-1011-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation