Skip to main content
Log in

Internationalization of an academic invention through successive science-business networks: The case of TAVI

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explain how new technology ventures move, grow, and scale. Such ventures internationalize much faster than depicted by the traditional Uppsala model (Johanson and Vahlne, J Int Bus Stud 8:23–32, 1977; Johanson and Vahlne, Mark Rev 7(4), 1990; Johanson and Vahlne, J Int Entrep 1:83–101, 2003; Johanson and Vahlne, Manag Int Rev 46:165–178, 2006; Oviatt and McDougall, J Int Bus Stud 25:45–64, 1994). According to the Uppsala model, the main reason it takes time is that entrepreneurs need to build networks and learn. Many scholars have investigated how they may be able to learn faster and grow networks more effectively. While these explanations contribute to a better understanding of the process, they appear disturbingly insufficient. By means of an in-depth case study, we aim at identifying how learning and network-building constraints may be circumvented. We have investigated the internationalization process of an invention at a Danish university hospital that became a new technology within minimally invasive heart surgery. While the invention took place in the periphery of the international medical network, the venture circulated to the most competent international science-business networks to mobilize resources and competencies. We found that its ability to succeed resulted from its roots in international academic networks and its connecting to core nodes in these as well as in adequate business networks—including, in particular, Venture Capital firms that are in the business of developing and scaling such technology ventures. We also found that the innovation process evolved through phases that called for different resources and capabilities. It thereby offered opportunities for actors, networks, and companies that control such capabilities to move in to take control and pull the venture through the next phase. The process is less like a long distance run, and more like a relay race. This radically reduces the need to learn as the new venture expands and scales.

Kurzdarstellung

Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es zu erklären wie neue Technologieunternehmungen voranschreiten, wachsen und anpassen. Derartige Unternehmungen expandieren wesentlich schneller als im traditionellen Uppsalamodell dargestellt (Johanson and Vahlne 1977, 1990, 2003, 2006; Oviatt and McDougall 1993). Dem Uppsalamodell zu Folge liegt der Hauptgrund für Zeitverzögerungen darin, dass Unternehmer Netzwerke bilden und lernen müssen. Es gibt zahlreiche Untersuchungen welche der Frage nachgehen, wie ein solcher Lernprozess beschleunigt werden kann und Netzwerke effizienter zum Wachstum gebracht werden können. Während solche Untersuchungen zum Verständnis des Prozesses beitragen, erscheinen sie jedoch eher unzureichend. Mit Hilfe einer tiefgründigen Fallstudie, zielen wir darauf ab Wege zu finden, wie Begrenzungen im Lern- und Netzwerkbildungsprozess umgangen werden können. Wir untersuchten den Internationalisierungsprozess einer Erfindung aus einem dänischen Universitätsklinikum, welche eine neue Technologie innerhalb der minimalinvasiven Herzchirurgie darstellt. Während die Erfindung in der Peripherie des internationalen medizinischen Netzwerkes vor sich ging, schloss die Unternehmung die sachkundigsten internationalen unternehmerischen Wissenschaftsnetzwerke ein um Ressourcen und Kompetenzen zu mobilisieren. Wir konnten feststellen, dass die Möglichkeit eines Erfolges aus den Verzweigungen internationaler akademischer Netzwerke resultierte und von Verbindungen zu Kernknoten in diesen Netzwerken sowie zu geeigneten Unternehmungsnetzwerken – einschließlich, insbesondere, Unternehmungskaptialfirmen welche im Geschäft sind solche Technologieunternehmungen zu entwickeln und anzupassen. Wir haben außerdem festgestellt, dass sich der Innovationsprozess über Phasen entwickelte, welche unterschiedliche Ressourcen und Fähigkeiten bedurften. Daraus ergaben sich Möglichkeiten für Einzelbeteiligte, Netzwerke und Unternehmen welche derartige Fähigkeiten besitzen sich einzubringen und Unternehmungen in die nächste Entwicklungsphase zu verhelfen. Der Entwicklungsprozess entspricht daher weniger einem Langstreckenlauf, sondern vielmehr einem Staffellauf. Dies reduziert erheblich den Lernbedarf während die Unternehmung expandiert und sich anpasst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaboen L, Dubois A, Lind F (2011) Start-ups starting up-firms looking for a network. IMP J 5:42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strateg Manag J 22:521–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almor T (2000) Born global: The case of small and medium sized, knowledge-intensive, Israeli firms. FDI, International Trade and the Economics of Peacemaking Tel Aviv: Leon Recanati Graduate School of Business Administration

  • Andersen H, Knudsen L, Hasenkam J (1992) Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J 13:704–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson P, Markendahl J, Mattsson L-G (2011) Technical development and the formation of new business ventures: the case of new mobile payment and ticketing services. IMP J 5:23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Evers N, Griot C (2013) Local and international networks in small firm internationalization: cases from the Rhône-Alpes medical technology regional cluster. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 25:867–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44:1242–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE, Warning S (2005) University spillovers and new firm location. Res Policy 34:1113–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio E (2005) Creative tension: the significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s article ‘toward a theory of international new ventures’. J Int Bus Stud 36:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manag J 43:909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantu CL, Corsaro D (2011) The formation of science and technology parks. IMP J 5:10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Y, Styles C, Wilkinson IF (2012) An opportunity-based view of rapid internationalization. J Int Mark 20:74–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty S, Campbell-Hunt C (2004) A strategic approach to internationalization: a traditional versus a “born-global” approach. J Int Mark 12:57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabuschi F, Perna A, Snehota I (2012) Assembling resources when forming a new business. J Bus Res 65:220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC (1973) Technical entrepreneurship: what do we know? R&D Manag 3:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37:713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Cox MP (2006) The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. J Int Entrep 4:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Jones MV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 19:485–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development. Eur J Mark 29:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1997) Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms International. Bus Rev 6:361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A (2012) Development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a 20-year odyssey. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 105:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A (2014) The odyssey of TAVR from concept to clinical reality. Tex Heart Inst J 41:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A et al (1986) Percutaneous transluminal aortic valvuloplasty using a balloon catheter. A new therapeutic option in aortic stenosis in the elderly. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 79:1678–1686

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A et al (2004) Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:698–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribier A et al (2006) Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1214–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick D, Jones MV (2000) Small high-technology firms and international high-technology markets. J Int Mark 8:63–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick D, Spence M (2005) The internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: a study of planned and unplanned strategies. Int Bus Rev 14:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson P (1994) Organizational change: a processual approach. Paul Chapman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson P (1997) In at the deep end: conducting processual research on organisational change. Scand J Manag 13:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis J-L, Lamothe L, Langley A (2001) The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Acad Manag J 44:809–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokovic D, Souitaris V (2008) Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research. J Technol Transf 33:225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druilhe C, Garnsey E (2004) Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? J Technol Transf 29:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubini P, Aldrich H (1991) Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 6:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir D et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: Results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation: CIRCULATIONAHA 112:104505

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis P, Pecotich A (2001) Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Mark Res 38:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwyn G, Taubert M, Kowalczuk J (2007) Sticky knowledge: a possible model for investigating implementation in healthcare contexts. Implement Sci 2:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H (2004a) International entrepreneurship as a dynamic adaptive system: towards a grounded theory. J Int Entrep 2:5–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H (2004b) Internationalization of small and medium sized enterprises: a grounded theoretical framework and an overview. Can J Adm Sci/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 21:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers N (2010) Factors influencing the internationalisation of new ventures in the Irish aquaculture industry: an exploratory study. J Int Entrep 8:392–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers N, O’Gorman C (2011) Improvised internationalization in new ventures: the role of prior knowledge and networks. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 23:549–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers N, Andersson S, Hannibal M (2012) Stakeholders and marketing capabilities in international new ventures: evidence from Ireland, Sweden and Denmark. J Int Mark 20:46–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S (2007) An integrated framework of de-internationalization strategies for smaller born-globals. Exploiting the B2B knowledge network: new perspectives and core concepts. In: 23rd IMP conference proceedings

  • Freeman S, Hutchings K, Lazaris M, Zyngier S (2010) A model of rapid knowledge development: the smaller born-global firm. Int Bus Rev 19:70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Keupp MM (2007) The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalising SMEs in the biotechnology industry: a knowledge-based view. J World Bus 42:350–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri P, Gronhaug K, Kristianslund I (2002) Research methods. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson E (2003) All research is interpretive! J Bus Ind Mark 18:482–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Johanson J (1988) Formal and informal cooperation strategies in international industrial networks. In: Contractor FJ, Lorange P (eds) Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp 369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Snehota I (1989) No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scand J Manag 5:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Snehota I (2006) No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scand J Manag 22:256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Waluszewski A (2007) Knowledge and innovation in business and industry: the importance of using others. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Halinen A, Medlin CJ, Törnroos J-Å (2012) Time and process in business network research. Ind Mark Manag 41:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewerdine L, Welch C (2013) Are international new ventures really new? A process study of organizational emergence and internationalization. J World Bus 48:466–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoholm T (2011) The contrary forces of innovation: an ethnography of innovation in the food industry. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurmerinta-Peltomäki L (2003) Time and internationalisation theoretical challenges set by rapid internationalisation. J Int Entrep 1:217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Mattsson LG (1986) International marketing and internationalization processes—a network approach. In: Turnbull P, Paliwode S (eds) Research in international marketing. Croom Helm, London, pp 234–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1990) The mechanism of internationalisation International. Mark Rev 7(4)

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2003) Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. J Int Entrep 1:83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2006) Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: a note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Manag Int Rev 46:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40:1411–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MV (1999) The internationalization of small high-technology firms. J Int Mark 7:15–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Khanna T (2006) Bringing history (back) into international business. J Int Bus Stud 37:453–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2009) The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: a review and suggestions for developing the field. J Manag 35:600–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss AN, Danis WM (2008) Country institutional context, social networks, and new venture internationalization speed. Eur Manag J 26:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35:124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodali SK et al (2011) Early and late (one year) outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (from the United States REVIVAL trial). Am J Cardiol 107:1058–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen O, Puumalainen K, Sintonen S, Kyläheiko K (2010) Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communications technology firms. J Int Entrep 8:135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen O, Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K (2012) Start-up patterns of internationalization: a framework and its application in the context of knowledge-intensive SMEs. Eur Manag J 30:372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laine A, Kock S (2000) A process model of internationalization—new times demands new patterns. In: Communication lors de la 16ème conférence de l’IMP, University of Bath, School of Management

  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24:691–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley A (2009) Studying processes in and around organizations. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods 409–429

  • Langley A, Truax J (1994) A process study of new technology adoption in smaller manufacturinf firms. J Manag Stud 31:619–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurell H, Andersson S, Achtenhagen L (2013) The importance of industry context for new venture internationalisation: a case study from the life sciences. J Int Entrep 11:297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ Sci 1:248–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkilä J, Tilvis R (1993) Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:1220–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen TK, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process? Int Bus Rev 6:561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman GD, Siegel DS, Wright M (2008) Research and technology commercialization. J Manag Stud 45:1401–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley A (2010) Looking back, going forward: reflecting on research into the SME internationalisation process. J Res Market Entrepreneurship 12:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Acad Manag J 43:902–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejri K, Umemoto K (2010) Small-and medium-sized enterprise internationalization: towards the knowledge-based model. J Int Entrep 8:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Min JK, Berman DS, Leipsic J (2013) Multimodality imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen Ø, Servais P (2002) Born global or gradual global? Examining the export behavior of small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 10:49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller K (2010) Academic spin-off’s transfer speed—analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Res Policy 39:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndonzuau FN, Pirnay F, Surlemont B (2002) A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 22:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojala A (2009) Internationalization of knowledge-intensive SMEs: the role of network relationships in the entry to a psychically distant market. Int Bus Rev 18:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton JD (1997) From inductive to iterative grounded theory: zipping the gap between process theory and process data. Scand J Manag 13:419–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto CM (2000) Timing of aortic valve surgery. Heart 84:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris IK, Akoorie ME, Sinha P (2012) International entrepreneurship: a critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research. J Int Entrep 10:279–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez MP, Sánchez AM (2003) The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation 23:823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen IB, Tobiassen AE (2012) Are born globals really born globals? The case of academic spin-offs with long development periods. J Int Entrep 10:117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1987) Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J Manag Stud 24:649–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1997) What is a processual analysis? Scand J Manag 13:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew A, Ferlie E, McKee L (1992) Shaping strategic change—the case of the NHS in the 1980s. Public Money Manag 12:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Packalen K, Whittington K (2012) Organizational and institutional genesis. In: Padgett JF, Powell WW (eds) The emergence of organizations and markets, vol 434. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 434–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight GA (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? Int Bus Rev 14:147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper S, Du J, Love JH (2008) Modelling the innovation value chain. Res Policy 37:961–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzier M, Antončič B, Konečnik M (2006) The resource-based approach to the internationalisation of SMEs: differences in resource bundles between internationalised and non-internationalised companies Zagreb. RISEC: Int Rev Econ Bus 9:95–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes F, Sallis J (2003) Promoting relationship learning. J Mark 67:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11:448–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma DD, Blomstermo A (2003) The internationalization process of born globals: a network view. Int Bus Rev 12:739–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel DS, Wright M (2015) Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? Br J Manag 26:582–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stremersch S, Van Dyck W (2009) Marketing of the life sciences: a new framework and research agenda for a nascent field. J Mark 73:4–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styles C, Seymour RG (2006) Opportunities for marketing researchers in international entrepreneurship. Int Mark Rev 23:126–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven A, Huber GP (1990) Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organ Sci 1:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven A, Polley D, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The innovation journey. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Adv Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence Growth 3:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A (2004) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Res Policy 33:147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther T, Kempfert J, Mohr FW (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: surgical perspectives. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 105:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JG, Binder RK (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the evolution of prostheses, delivery systems and approaches. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 105:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena J, Mort GS, Liesch PW, Knight G (2007) Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: a dynamic capabilities perspective. J World Bus 42:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch C, Paavilainen-Mäntymäki E (2014) Putting process (back) in: research on the internationalization process of the firm. Int J Manag Rev 16:2–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Tontti V (2002) Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms. Int Bus Rev 11:279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zain M, Ng SI (2006) The impacts of network relationships on SMEs’ internationalization process. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 48:183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Mikhailova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikhailova, O., Olsen, P.I. Internationalization of an academic invention through successive science-business networks: The case of TAVI. J Int Entrep 14, 441–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0186-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0186-8

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation