Skip to main content
Log in

Trade Intermediaries and the Tariff Pass-through

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at improving our understanding of the price effects of trade policies following two perspectives. First, we wish to study how the role of intermediaries in international trade affects the transmission of tariff changes to domestic prices. Second, we explore how our results are influenced by the degree of competition in the distribution-service market. In a Cournot oligopoly-oligopsony model, we show how the pass-through of tariff cuts to domestic prices is limited by the market power of intermediaries producing distribution services. Our long-run equilibrium is characterized by a larger number of firms selling at a higher mark-up. Market access barriers in distribution services determine to what extent tariff cuts are transferred to domestic consumers and foreign producers, affecting the size of their welfare effects. The benefits of trade liberalization policies can be better achieved if they are complemented by competition enhancing measures in the intermediation sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Feenstra (1989) shows the equivalence between the domestic price effects of tariff and exchange rate changes. Empirical research has focused mainly on exchange rates, also because tariff changes are relatively less frequent and their specific impact is more difficult to detect in the data (Ianchovichina et al. 2000).

  2. We assume that \( \overset{\sim }{\mathrm{c}} \)< λ, which is a necessary condition for production to be profitable.

  3. These theoretical conclusions reveal a close analogy with the empirical results reached by Frankel et al. (2005), who show that the exchange rate pass-through decreases along the value processing chain.

  4. Our model could easily be extended to the case in which intermediaries are located in both countries, as well as to a more general scenario, in which they are located in two different countries, separated by trade barriers in distribution services, and import an input produced in a third country.

References

  • Blackhurst R (1991) Trade policy is competition policy, in competition and economic development. OECD, Paris

  • Deardorff AV, Rajaraman I (2009) Buyer concentration in Markets for Developing Country Exports. Rev Dev Econ 13:190–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel C (2009) International trade and retailing. CESifo working paper series No. 2597

  • Feenstra RC (1989) Symmetric pass-through of tariffs and exchange rates under imperfect competition. J Int Econ 27:25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra RC (1995) Estimating the effects of trade policy. In: Grossman G, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of international economics, Elsevier, vol 3, pp 1553–1595

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra RC, Hanson G (2004) Intermediaries in entrepôt trade: hong kong re-exports of chinese goods. J Econ Manag Strateg 13:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois J, Wooton I (2010) Market structure and market access. World Econ 33:873–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel J, Parsley D, Wei S (2005) Slow pass-through around the world: a new import for developing countries? NBER working paper series No. 11199

  • Gresser C, Tickell S (2002) Mugged. Poverty in your coffee cup. Oxfam, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman P (1989) Trade policy and market structure. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman B, Shepherd B (2015) Who profits from trade facilitation initiatives? Implications for African countries. J Afr Trade 2:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman B, Olarreaga M, Kee HL (2001) Mark-ups, entry regulation and trade: does country size matter? CEPR discussion paper series No. 2853

  • Ianchovichina E, Binkley J, Hertel T (2000) Procompetitive effects of foreign competition on domestic markups. Rev Int Econ 8:134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan K (2000) Restrictions on trade in distribution services. Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1987) Pricing-to-market when the exchange rate changes. In: Arndt SW, Richardson JD (eds) Real financial linkages among open economies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoo A, Sauvé P (eds) (2003) Domestic regulation and service trade liberalization. The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorriston S (2012) Commodity prices, government policies and competition. In: Evenett SJ, Jenny F (eds) Trade, competition, and the pricing of commodities. CEPR and Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS International)

  • Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on Intraindustry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz MJ, Ottaviano G (2008) Market size, trade and productivity. Review of economic studies 75:295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisset J (1998) Unfair trade? The increasing gap between world and domestic prices in commodity markets during the past 25 years. World Bank Econ Rev 12:503–26

  • Olarreaga M, Özden Ç (2005) AGOA and apparel: who captures the tariff rent in the presence of preferential market access? World Econ 28:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porto G, Chauvin N, Olarreaga M (2011) Supply chains in export agriculture, Competition and poverty in sub-saharan africa. World Bank and CEPR, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff H, Schmitt, N (2009) Imports, pass-through and the structure of retail markets. CESifo working paper series No. 2817

  • Roberts M, Tybout J (1996) Industrial evolution in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers TR, Sexton RJ (1994) Assessing the importance of oligopsony power in agricultural markets. Am J Agric Econ 76:1143–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitone TL, Sexton RJ (2009) A flexible oligopoly-oligopsony model for classroom simulations and policy analyses. J Ind Organ Educ 4(art. 1)

  • Sexton RJ, Sheldon I, McCorriston S, Wang H (2007) Agricultural trade liberalization and economic development: the role of downstream market power. Agric Econ 36:253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon I (2006) Market structure, Industrial concentration, and price transmission. Ohio State University, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd B (2004) Market power in international commodity processing chains: preliminary results from the coffee market. Group d’Economie Mondiale, Sciences-Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber DF (1999) Market microstructure. Intermediaries and the theory of the firm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Stern RM, Brown DK (1988) US-Canada bilateral tariff elimination: the role of product differentiation and market structure. Working papers series No. 227, research seminar in international economics, University of Michigan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lelio Iapadre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iapadre, P.L., Pace, G. Trade Intermediaries and the Tariff Pass-through. J Ind Compet Trade 16, 441–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-016-0228-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-016-0228-x

Keywords

Navigation