Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation value of post-mining headwaters: drainage channels at a lignite spoil heap harbour threatened stream dragonflies

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Headwaters and small streams are crucial components of riverine systems, harbouring many highly specialized and unique invertebrate species. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of the Central European lowland headwaters are channelized, eutrophicated and/or polluted, and many related species have become critically endangered. Artificial streams established to drain some post-mining sites supplement a network of headwaters and generally do not suffer from agricultural pollution. Nevertheless, the biodiversity and conservation potential of the streams at post-mining sites has never been evaluated. We studied the biodiversity of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) at 53 sections (30 m) of an extraordinarily dense system of drainage ditches at a large lignite spoil heap in the Czech Republic. We recorded 22 dragonfly species, of which eight are threatened according to the national Red List. Moreover, four of them are closely associated with the endangered environment of small streams. Overall diversity was generally low at very tiny and/or narrowed streams and was also strongly reduced by high water velocity, high bankside inclination and dominance of expansive common reeds. Sufficient cover of rather shallow sediment layers strongly supports the studied diversity indicators. We thus conclude that post-mining streams in drainage ditches could have a strong potential to offer secondary habitats for threatened headwater biodiversity. However, intermittent reed suppression and the establishment of gently sloping banks and a structured stream bottom are necessary measures for maximizing post-mining stream conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailstock M, Norman C, Bushmann P (2001) Common reed Phragmites australis: control and effects upon biodiversity in freshwater nontidal wetlands. Restor Ecol 21:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD, Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bioscience 43:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen KA, Le Duc MG, Thompson DJ (2010) Habitat and conservation of the enigmatic damselfly Ischnura pumilio. J Insect Conserv 14:689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneš J, Kepka P, Konvička M (2003) Limestone quarries as refuges for European xerophilous butterflies. Conserv Biol 17:1058–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffington JM, Montgomery DR (1999) Effects of hydraulic roughness on surface textures of gravel-bed rivers. Water Resour Res 35:3507–3521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon FJ, McIntosh AR, Harding JS (2013) Habitat loss drives threshold response of benthic invertebrate communities to deposited sediment in agricultural streams. Ecol Appl 23:1036–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chester ET, Robson BJ (2013) Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: their ecological characteristics and management. Biol Conserv 166:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, Nally RM, Bond N, Lake PS (2008) Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshw Biol 53:1707–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Descloux S, Datry T, Marmonier P (2013) Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a gradient of increasing streambed colmation by fine sediment. Aquat Sci 75:493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolný A, Harabiš F (2012) Underground mining can contribute to freshwater biodiversity conservation: allogenic succession forms suitable habitats for dragonflies. Biol Conserv 145:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolný A, Bárta D, Waldhauser M, Holuša O, Hanel L (2007) The dragonflies of the Czech Republic: ecology, conservation and distribution. Český svaz ochránců přírody Vlašim, Vlašim

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorotovičová C (2013) Man-made canals as a hotspot of aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Slovakia. Limnol Ecol Manag Inland Waters 43:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J (2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J Stat Softw 8:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomi T, Sidle RC, Richardson JS (2002) Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater system. Bioscience 52:905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanel L, Dolný A, Zelený J (2005) Odonata. In: Farkač J, Král D, Škorpík M (eds) Red list of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates, AOPK ČR, Praha, pp 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2012) Human altered ecosystems: suitable habitats as well as ecological traps for dragonflies (Odonata): the matter of scale. J Insect Conserv 16:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2015) Necessity for the conservation of drainage systems as last refugia for threatened damselfly species, Coenagrion ornatum. Insect Conserv Divers 8:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Tichanek F, Tropek R (2013) Dragonflies of freshwater pools in lignite spoil heaps: restoration management, habitat structure and conservation value. Ecol Eng 55:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EB (1998) Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:14843–14847

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassall C, Hollinshead J, Hull A (2011) Environmental correlates of plant and invertebrate species richness in ponds. Biodivers Conserv 20:3189–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrychová M, Šálek M, Tajovský K, Řehoř M (2012) soil properties and species richness of invertebrates on afforested sites after brown coal mining. Restor Ecol 20:561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzon I, Helenius J (2008) Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biol Conserv 141:1171–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesoun P, Dolný A (2011) Vážky. In: Tropek R, Řehounek J (eds) Bezobratlí postindustriálních stanovišť: Význam, ochrana a management. ENTÚ BC AVČR & Calla, České Budějovice, pp 85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodačová D, Prach K (2003) Spoil heaps from brown coal mining: technical reclamation vs. spontaneous re-vegetation. Restor Ecol 11:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins RL, Altier BM, Haselman D, Merry AD, White JJ (2013) Exploring the legacy effects of surface coal mining on stream chemistry. Hydrobiologia 713:87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janse JH, Van Puijenbroek PJTM (1998) Effects of eutrophication in drainage ditches. Environ Pollut 102:547–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkman VJ, Clausnitzer V, Dijkstra K-DB, Orr AG, Paulson DR, van Tol J (2008) Global diversity of dragonflies (Odonata) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 363:351–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkman VJ, Boudot JP, Bernard R, Conze KJ, de Knijf G, Dyatlova E, Ferreira S, Jović M, Ott J, Riservato E, Sahlén G (2010) European red list of dragonflies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm JT, Richardson PJ (2010) Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. J Appl Ecol 47:966–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B, Rundle S (2002) Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29:134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks M, Lapin B, Randall J (1994) Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management, and monitoring. Nat Areas J 14:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Wallace JB (2001) Lost linkages and lotic ecology: rediscovering small streams. In: Press MC, Huntly NJ, Levin S (eds) Ecology: achievement and challenge. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 295–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Strayer DL, Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Helfman GS, Leonard NE (2007) The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:86–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailova P, Warchałowska-Śliwa E, Szarek-Gwiazda E, Kownacki A (2012) Does biodiversity of macroinvertebrates and genome response of Chironomidae larvae (Diptera) reflect heavy metal pollution in a small pond? Environ Monit Assess 184:1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BA (1999) Wetland restoration, flood pulsing, and disturbance dynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrák O, Frouz J, Velichová V (2010) Understory vegetation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining forest stands. Ecol Eng 36:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muotka T, Laasonen P (2002) Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. J Appl Ecol 39:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muotka T, Paavola R, Haapala A, Novikmec M, Laasonen P (2002) Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biol Conserv 105:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz M (1998) Stream system restoration in a strip mining region, eastern Germany: dimension, problems and first steps. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H, McClain M (2005) Riparia. Ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter D (1998) Effects of ditch management patterns on Odonata at Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK. Biol Conserv 84:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen TCM, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Madsen TV (2006) Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams. Freshw Biol 51:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen ML, Friberg N, Skriver J, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Larsen SE (2007) Restoration of Skjern River and its valley—short-term effects on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates. Ecol Eng 30:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RC, Madsen BL, Wilzbach MA, Magadza CHD, Paarlberg A, Kullberg A, Cummins KW (1987) Stream management: emerging global similarities. Ambio 16:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty JT, Gingerich G, Anderson JT, Ziemkiewicz PF (2013) Ecological function of constructed perennial stream channels on reclaimed surface coal mines. Hydrobiologia 720:39–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher M (ed) (2011) Dragonflies in quarries and gravel pits. Biodiversity in mineral extraction sites. HeidelbergCement & INULA, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Feber RE, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ (2012) Identifying high-quality pond habitats for Odonata in lowland England: implications for agri-environment schemes. Insect Conserv Divers 5:422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remsburg AJ, Olson AC, Samways MJ (2008) Shade alone reduces adult dragonfly (Odonata: Libellulidae) abundance. J Insect Behav 21:460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JS, Danehy RJ (2007) A synthesis of the ecology of headwater streams and their riparian zones in temperate forests. For Sci 52:131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis T, Sand-Jensen K (2001) Historical changes in species composition and richness accompanying perturbation and eutrophication of Danish lowland streams over 100 years. Freshw Biol 46:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouquette JR, Thompson DJ (2005) Habitat associations of the endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale, in a water meadow ditch system in southern England. Biol Conserv 123:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šálek M (2012) Spontaneous succession on opencast mining sites: implications for bird biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 49:1417–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten MA, Verweij PA, Barendregt A, Kleukers R, Kalkman VJ, de Ruiter PC (2008) Determinants of species richness patterns in the Netherlands across multiple taxonomic groups. Biodivers Conserv 18:203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šebelíková L, Řehounková K, Prach K (2015) Spontaneous revegetation vs. forestry reclamation in post-mining sand pits. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-5330-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2011) Comparative assessment of indices of freshwater habitat conditions using different invertebrate taxon sets. Ecol Indic 11:370–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Štýs S (1981) Rekultivace území narušených těžbou. STN, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Kadlec T, Karesova P, Spitzer L, Kocarek P, Malenovsky I, Banar P, Tuf IH, Hejda M, Konvicka M (2010) Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. J Appl Ecol 47:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Kadlec T, Hejda M, Kocarek P, Skuhrovec J, Malenovsky I, Vodka S, Spitzer L, Banar P, Konvicka M (2012) Technical reclamations are wasting the conservation potential of post-mining sites. A case study of black coal spoil dumps. Ecol Eng 43:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Cerna I, Straka J, Cizek O, Konvicka M (2013) Is coal combustion the last chance for vanishing insects of inland drift sand dunes in Europe? Biol Conserv 162:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Cerna I, Straka J, Kadlec T, Pech P, Tichanek F, Sebek P (2014) Restoration management of fly ash deposits crucially influence their conservation potential for terrestrial arthropods. Ecol Eng 73:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vermonden K, Leuven RSEW, van der Velde G, van Katwijk MM, Roelofs JGM, Hendriks AJ (2009) Urban drainage systems: an undervalued habitat for aquatic macroinvertebrates. Biol Conserv 142:1105–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vojar J, Doležalová J, Solský M (2012) Brown coal spoil banks—a new opportunity (not only) for amphibians. Ochrana Prirody 2012:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldhauser M, Mikát M (2010) New records of Coenagrion ornatum in the Czech Republic (Odonata : coenagrionidae). Libellula 29:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AM, Ormerod SJ (2004) The distribution of three uncommon freshwater gastropods in the drainage ditches of British grazing marshes. Biol Conserv 118:455–466

  • Wildermuth H (2008) Habitat requirements of Orthetrum coerulescens and management of a secondary habitat in a highly man-modified landscape (Odonata: Libellulidae). Int J Odonatol 11:261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wipfli MS, Richardson JS, Naiman RJ (2007) Ecological linkages between headwaters and downstream ecosystems: transport of organic matter, invertebrates, and wood down headwater channels. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell SM, Mount JF, Larsen EW (2006) The influence of relative sediment supply on riverine habitat heterogeneity. Geomorphology 80:310–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Petr Šmilauer for revision of our statistics and helpful comments on earlier drafts, to David Boukal for help with the research planning, to Simona Poláková for advice on statistics and to Matthew Sweney for proofreading of our English. The study was financed by the Czech Science Foundation (P504/12/2525), the University of South Bohemia (GAJU 168/2013/P), and the institutional support Grant RVO:60077344.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 1760, 370 05, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

    Filip Tichanek

  2. Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branisovska 31, 370 05, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

    Filip Tichanek & Robert Tropek

  3. Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, 128 44, Praha 2, Czech Republic

    Robert Tropek

Authors
  1. Filip Tichanek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Tropek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filip Tichanek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tichanek, F., Tropek, R. Conservation value of post-mining headwaters: drainage channels at a lignite spoil heap harbour threatened stream dragonflies. J Insect Conserv 19, 975–985 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9814-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9814-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation