Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the verge? Preferential use of road-facing hedgerow margins by bumblebees in agro-ecosystems

Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global pollinator decline is commonly linked to modern intensive farming practices, partly because excessive herbicide and fertilizer use is thought to reduce pollinator food plant availability. This effect is particularly obvious across crop-/non-crop boundaries, but no study has compared pollinator and food plant abundance on adjacent crop- and roadside margins. We compared bumblebee abundance along 30 hedgerows in SW England; bordered either side by roads and arable fields (cultivated with wheat, barley, oilseed rape, or beans). Total bumblebee abundance along roadsides was over twice that observed on adjacent crop-facing margins, irrespective of crop type and this general pattern was apparent for three of the five most common bumblebee species, including generalist and specialist foragers. Both the total number of flowering plant species and the floral abundance of three of the five most visited plants was also higher on roadsides; minor variation between-crops was localised and unrelated to margin orientation. We conclude that organic farming may offer some advantages for pollinator conservation since it reduces field margin exposure to agro-chemical inputs. However, since conventional farming will remain central to global food production, modifications to current practices (such as the use of wildflower strips) are needed and may have ancillary benefits for pollinators by protecting arable margins from disturbance and agro-chemicals. In addition, the fact that the roadsides were demonstrably better habitats for pollinators and their food plants than field-facing margins underscores the widespread suggestion that roadside verges should be utilised more as a conservation tool to promote pollinator biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht M, Duelli P, Müller CB, Kleijn D, Schmid B (2007) The Swiss agri-environment scheme enhances pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in nearby intensively managed farmland. J Appl Ecol 44:813–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron GL, Raine NE, Brown MJF (2014) Impact of chronic exposure to a pyrethroid pesticide on bumblebees and interactions with a trypanosome parasite. J Appl Ecol 51:460–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belfrage K, Björklund J, Salomonsson L (2005) The effects of farm size and organic farming on diversity of birds, pollinators, and plants in a Swedish landscape. Ambio 34:582–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bettez ND, Marino R, Howarth RW, Davidson EA (2013) Roads as nitrogen deposition hot spots. Biogeochem 114:149–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breeze TD, Bailey AP, Balcombe KG, Potts SG (2014) Costing conservation: an expert appraisal of the pollinator habitat benefits of England’s entry level stewardship. Biodivers Conserv 23:1193–1214

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain C, Potts SG (2011) The potential impacts of insecticides on the life-history traits of bees and the consequences for pollination. Basic Appl Ecol 12:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumblebees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Goulson D, Nowakowski M (2007) Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumblebee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. J Appl Ecol 44:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor DJ (2008) Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Res 106:187–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxton PJ, Carvell C, Mountford JO, Sparks TH (2002) A comparison of green-lanes and field margins as bumblebee habitat in an arable landscape. Biol Conserv 107:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cauwer B, Reheul D, Nijs I, Milbau A (2006) Effect of margin strips on soil mineral nitrogen and plant diversity. Agron Sustain Dev 26:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D, Sait SM, Kunin WE, Benton TG (2013) Food production versus biodiversity: comparing organic and conventional agriculture. J Appl Ecol 50:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallai N, Salles JM, Settele J, Vaissière BE (2009) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ 68:810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garthwaite DG, Hudson S, Barker I, Parrish G, Smith L, Pietravalle S (2013) Pesticide usage survey report 250: arable crops in Great Britain 2012. DEFRA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J (2005) Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollinator crisis. Trends Ecol Evol 20:367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2010) Bumblebees: behaviour, ecology, and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Darvill B (2004) Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees; are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers? Apidologie 35:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Hanley ME (2004) Distribution and forage use of exotic bumblebees in South Island, New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 28:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis JS, Knight ME (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol Conserv 122:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis JS (2006) Biotope associations and the decline of bumblebees (Bombus sp.). J Insect Conserv 10:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumblebees. Ann Rev Entomol 53:191–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ME, Franco M, Dean CE, Franklin EL, Harris HR, Haynes AG, Rapson SR, Rowse G, Thomas KC, Waterhouse BR, Knight ME (2011) Increased bumblebee abundance along the margins of a mass flowering crop: evidence for pollinator spill-over. Oikos 120:1618–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ME, Awbi AJ, Franco M (2014) Going native? Flower use by bumblebees in English urban gardens. Ann Bot 113:799–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon LE, Sisk TD (2009) Hedgerows in an agri-natural landscape: potential habitat value for native bees. Biol Conserv 142:2140–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard MS, Carvell C, Carreck NL, Rothery P, Osborne JL, Bourke AFG (2007) Landscape context not patch size determines bumblebee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. Biol Lett 3:638–641

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen CI, Langer V (2013) Road verges and winter wheat fields as resources for wild bees in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2007) Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context. J Appl Ecol 44:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood JE (2008) The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv 141:2632–2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kells AR, Holland JM, Goulson D (2001) The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees. J Insect Conserv 5:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight ME, Martin AP, Bishop S, Osborne JL, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA, Goulson D (2005) An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Mol Ecol 14:1811–1820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mänd M, Mänd R, Williams IH (2002) Bumblebees in the agricultural landscape of Estonia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning P, Taylor G, Hanley ME (2014) Bioenergy, food production and biodiversity—an unlikely alliance? GCB Bioenergy. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12173

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrs RH, Williams CT, Frost AJ, Plant RA (1989) Assessment of the effects of herbicide spray drift on a range of species of conservation interest. Environ Poll 59:71–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJR, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merckx T, Feber RE, Riordan P, Townsend MC, Bourn NAD, Parsons MS, Macdonald DW (2009) Optimizing the biodiversity gain from agri-environment schemes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordijk J, Delille K, Schaffers AP, Sýkora KV (2009) Optimizing grassland management for flower-visiting insects in roadside verges. Biol Conserv 142:2097–2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne JL, Martin AP, Carreck NL, Swain JL, Knight ME, Goulson D, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA (2008) Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. J Anim Ecol 77:406–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto S, Lazzaro L, Finizio A, Zanin G (2009) Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on nontarget arthropods in field hedgerows. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:853–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Meek WR, Loxton RG, Nowakowski M, Carvell C, Woodcock BA (2011) Ecological restoration on farmland can drive beneficial functional responses in plant and invertebrate communities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz J, Schäfer K, Brühl CA (2014) Agrochemicals in field margins—field evaluation of plant reproduction effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485:229–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skórka P, Lenda M, Moroń D, Kalarus K, Tryjanowski P (2013) Factors affecting road mortality and the suitability of road verges for butterflies. Biol Conserv 159:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF (1998) Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review. Global Ecol Biogeogr 7:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staley JT, Sparks TH, Croxton PJ, Baldock KCR, Heard MS, Hulmes S, Hulmes L, Peyton J, Amya SR, Pywell RF (2012) Long-term effects of hedgerow management policies on resource provision for wildlife. Biol Conserv 145:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley DA, Stout JC (2013) Quantifying the impacts of bioenergy crops on pollinating insect abundance and diversity: a field-scale evaluation reveals taxon—specific responses. J Appl Ecol 50:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiouris S, Marshall EJP (1998) Observations on patterns of granular fertiliser deposition beside hedges and its likely effects on the botanical composition of field margins. Ann Appl Biol 132:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, Ahnström J, Turnbull LA, Bengtsson J (2014) Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 51:746–755

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanbergen A, Initiative The Insect Pollinators (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 11:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watmough SA, McDonough AM, Raney SM (2014) Characterizing the influence of highways on springtime NO2 and NH3 concentrations in regional forest monitoring plots. Environ Pollut 190:150–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 6:961–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehorn PR, Tinsley MC, Brown MJF, Darvill B, Goulson D (2011) Genetic diversity, parasite prevalence and immunity in wild bumblebees. Proc R Soc B 278:1195–1202

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehorn PR, O’Connor S, Wackers FL, Goulson D (2012) Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumblebee colony growth and queen production. Science 336:351–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH, Osborne JL (2009) Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40:367–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH, Brown MJF, Carolan JC, Goulson D, An J et al (2012) Unveiling cryptic species of the bumblebee subgenus Bombus s. str. world-wide with COI barcodes (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Syst Biodivers 10:21–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vazquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik VA, Buchmann S (2012) Pollinator conservation and management on electrical transmission and roadside rights-of-way: a review. J Pollinat Ecol 7:16–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the land owners for access to their farms and Max Ward, Laura Gould, Sarah Lippett, Matthew Ironmonger, and Alina Tarnawska for help with data collection, and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier draft of this MS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mick E. Hanley.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanley, M.E., Wilkins, J.P. On the verge? Preferential use of road-facing hedgerow margins by bumblebees in agro-ecosystems. J Insect Conserv 19, 67–74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9744-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9744-3

Keywords

Navigation