Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The importance of viticultural landscape features and ecosystem service enhancement for native butterflies in New Zealand vineyards

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fragmentation of habitats in intensively managed farming landscapes is often considered to be partly responsible for butterfly population decline in Europe and the USA. Although relatively little is known about New Zealand butterfly ecology, agricultural landscapes in lowland New Zealand are managed similarly to those in Europe and ecosystem services (ES) in these landscapes are generally at a low level. In the northern hemisphere, attempts are being made to address the problem through agri-environment schemes, but such farmer compensation is not available in New Zealand. Instead, landowner- and research-led initiatives are currently the only potential approaches. One such project in the Canterbury province, New Zealand, is the Greening Waipara project. This aims to return native plants to viticultural landscapes and enhance ES, and while research has sought to quantify economic benefits of the project, there has been no work to establish if the plantings are improving or are likely to improve non-target invertebrate biodiversity, for example arthropods that are not biocontrol agents. In the first study of its kind in New Zealand, butterfly surveys were conducted in vineyards and linear mixed modelling techniques were used to identify the most important vegetation and structural features which may influence butterfly distribution. While the native planting areas were not important for butterflies, remnant patches of native vegetation in unproductive areas were vital for sedentary species. These results are discussed in relation to the conservation of native species in New Zealand vineyards and in the context of conservation in and around farmland in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berndt LA, Wratten SD, Scarratt SL (2006) The influence of floral resource subsidies on parasitism rates of leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in New Zealand vineyards. Biol Control 37:50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatman ND (1992) Improvement of field margin habitat by selective control of annual weeds. Asp Appl Biol 29:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen HD, Holbeck HB, Reddersen J (2001) Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark. Biol Conserv 98:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J.1984. The prehistory of New Zealand. Longman Paul, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Dennis RLH (2004) Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecol Entomol 29:744–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH (2010) A resource based habitat view for conservation: butterflies in the British Landscape. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Hardy PB (2007) Support for mending the matrix: resource seeking by butterflies in apparent non-resource zones. J Insect Conserv 11:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover JW (1994) Arable field margins—factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance. In: Boatman, N (ed) Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation, p 59–66

  • Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover JW, Fry GLA (2001) Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape. Entomologia Ex Appl 100:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover J, Sparks T (2000) A review of the ecology of butterflies in British hedgerows. J Environ Manag 60:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover J, Sparks T, Clarke S, Gobbett K, Glossop S (2000) Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera—sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feber RE, Johnson PJ, Firbank LG, Hopkins A, Macdonald DW (2007) A comparison of butterfly populations on organically and conventionally managed farmland. J Zool 273:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler AK, Landis DA, Wratten SD (2008) Maximizing ecosystem services from conservation biological control: the role of habitat management. Biol Control 45:254–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen M, Nilsson SG (2008) How can we preserve and restore species richness of pollinating insects on agricultural land? Ecography 31:698–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs GW (1980) New Zealand butterflies. Collins, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M (2010) The conservation of native New Zealand butterflies in the ecologically enhanced landscape of Waipara, north Canterbury. PhD thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand

  • Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy PB, Dennis RLH (2007) Seasonal and Daily shifts in substrate use by settling butterflies: conserving resources for invertebrates has a behavioural dimension. J Insect Behav 20:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivinen S, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Helenius J (2006) Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effects of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location. J Biogeog 33:862–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Snoeijing GIJ (1997) Field boundary vegetation and the effects of agrochemical drift: Botanical change caused by low levels of herbicide and fertilizer. J Appl Ecol 34:1413–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Johl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, Heliola J, Luoto M, Poyry J (2007) Determinants of local species richness of diurnal Lepidoptera in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyt Environ 122:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini L, Fontana P, Klimek S, Battisti A, Gaston KJ (2008) Impact of farm size and topography on plant and insect diversity of managed grasslands in the alps. Biol Conserv 142:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone MS (1989) The Polynesian settlement of New-Zealand in relation to environmental and biotic changes. NZ J Ecol 12:115–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurk CD (2008) Vegetation of the Canterbury plains and downlands. In: Winterbourn M, Knox G, Burrows C, Marsden I (eds) Natural history of canterbury. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch, pp 195–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson SM, Wydoski R (2008) Riparian butterfly (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) assemblages associated with Tamarix-dominated, native vegetation-dominated, and Tamarix removal sites along the Arkansas river, Colorado, USA. Restor Ecol 16:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2007) Understanding the requirements of the insects we seek to conserve. J Insect Conserv 11:95–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Winegrowers 2009. Statistical Annual 2009. Auckland, New Zealand http://www.nzwine.com/info-centre/#statistics

  • Ockinger E, Eriksson AK, Smith HG (2006) Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biol Conserv 133:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick BH, Dugdale JS (2000) Conservation status of the New Zealand Lepidoptera. Sci Conserv 136:33

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Hall ML, Bibby TJ (1986) Research and survey in nature conservation No. 2. Monitoring the abundance of butterflies 1976–85. NCC, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle RM (1976) Conservation of Lepidoptera in the United States. Biol Conserv 9:55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Petit S, Firbank LG (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Development Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Rundlof M, Bengtsson J, Smith HG (2008) Local and landscape effects of organic farming on butterfly species richness and abundance. J Appl Ecol 45:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarratt SL (2005) Enhancing the biological control of leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using floral resource subsidies in an organic vineyard in Marlborough, New Zealand. PhD Thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand

  • Schmitt T, Augenstein B, Finger A (2008) The influence of changes in viticulture management on the butterfly (Lepidoptera) diversity in a wine growing region of south-western Germany. Eur J Entomol 105:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd S, Debinski DM (2005) Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 126:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibatani A (1992) Decline and conservation of butterflies in Japan. J Res Lepidoptera 29:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Steichen RM, Lewis MN (2005) Restoring lepidopteran communities to oak savannas: contrasting influences of habitat quantity and quality. Restor Ecol 13:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SR, Goulson D, Holland JM (2001) Resource provision for farmland gamebirds: the value of beetle banks. Ann Appl Biol 139:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins JML (2009) Endemic New Zealand plants for pest management in vineyards. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on biological control of arthropods, Christchurch, New Zealand, 8–13 February, 2009. USDA, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, pp 234–245

  • Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Wade MR, Wratten SD, Bengtsson J, Kleijn D (2007) Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. Royal Entomological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work could not have been completed without the fieldwork assistance of Mariska Anderson and Emma Thomas. Thanks also to Brian Patrick, George Gibbs, Tim New and Nick Sotherton for valuable advice and comments on the work as it progressed, and to the vineyard owners who allowed us access to their properties. Mark Gillespie was funded by a New Zealand Educated International Doctoral Research Scholarship (NZIDRS) and by the Bio-Protection Research Centre of Lincoln University and the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology (FRST; LINX 0303).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Gillespie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillespie, M., Wratten, S.D. The importance of viticultural landscape features and ecosystem service enhancement for native butterflies in New Zealand vineyards. J Insect Conserv 16, 13–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9390-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9390-y

Keywords

Navigation