Abstract
The Gove Crow butterfly, Euploea alcathoe enastri Fenner, 1991, is restricted to Gove Peninsula of north-eastern Arnhem Land, a remote area of northern Australia. The subspecies has been listed as an Endangered taxon under federal and Northern Territory legislation, and represents one of only a few cases in the Australian Region in which a tropical butterfly has been targeted for species-orientated conservation. However, accurate status evaluation and conservation management have been hampered by lack of detailed information on spatial distribution, critical habitat, and the extent and severity of threatening processes. Surveys carried out during 2006–2008 indicate that the subspecies has a limited geographical range (extent of occurrence approximately 6,700 km2) within which it is recorded from 11 locations or subpopulations embracing a total of 21 sites. Most sites comprise discrete habitat patches that are relatively small in area (<10 ha) within which adults are localised and occur in low abundance (<15 h−1). Of the four major habitat types in which E. alcathoe enastri was detected, only mixed paperbark tall open forest with rainforest elements in the understorey and rainforest edge (i.e. the ecotone between evergreen monsoon vine-forest and eucalypt/paperbark woodland) comprise breeding habitats. These habitat patches were always associated with permanent creeks or perennial groundwater seepages or springs that form swamplands, usually along drainage lines or flood plains in coastal or near coastal lowland areas. Major threats identified at the site level are habitat modification through altered fire regime and habitat disturbance by feral animals (buffalo, pig); potential threats at the landscape level include habitat loss through invasive species (grassy weeds, tramp ants) and global climate change. However, since critical breeding areas are subject to natural disturbance by both fire and flood, and occasionally cyclonic events, an optimal balance in disturbance regime is probably required to sustain breeding populations. Although E. alcathoe enastri is a narrow-range endemic that is ecologically specialised, there is no evidence of decline. Accordingly, the conservation status of the subspecies should be regarded as Near Threatened (‘Conservation Dependent’) under IUCN criteria. Components for an effective long-term conservation management plan of the butterfly and its habitat, which largely depend on the cooperation of traditional landowners and involvement of local indigenous ranger groups, are briefly discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackery PA, Vane-Wright RI (1984) Milkweed butterflies: their cladistics and biology. British Museum (Natural History), London
Banfai DS, Bowman DMJS (2006) Forty years of lowland monsoon forest expansion in Kakadu National Park, Northern Australia. Biol Conserv 131:553–565
Banfai DS, Bowman DMJS (2007) Drivers of rain-forest boundary dynamics in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia: a field assessment. J Trop Ecol 23:73–86
Braby MF (2000) Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne
Braby MF (2006) National Recovery Plan for the Gove Crow Butterfly, Euploea alcathoe enastri. A report prepared for the Australian Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Heritage. Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts, Darwin
Braby MF (2007) Collecting biological specimens in the Northern Territory with particular reference to terrestrial invertebrates: guidelines to current legislation and permits. North Territory Nat 19:35–45
Braby MF (2008) Biogeography of butterflies in the Australian monsoon tropics. Aust J Zool 56:41–56
Braby MF (2009) The life history and biology of Euploea alcathoe enastri Fenner, 1991 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from northeastern Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia. Aust Entomol 36:51–62
Braby MF, Douglas F (2004) The taxonomy, ecology and conservation status of the Golden-rayed Blue, a threatened butterfly endemic to western Victoria, Australia. Biol J Linn Soc 81:275–299
Braby MF, Douglas F (2008) The nomenclature, taxonomy and conservation status of Ogyris waterhouseri (Bethune-Baker, 1905) stat. nov. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), a threatened butterfly from southern Australia. Aust J Entomol 47:315–329
Braithwaite RW, Dudzinski ML, Ridpath MG, Parker BS (1984) The impact of water buffalo on the monsoon forest ecosystem in Kakadu National Park. Aust J Ecol 9:309–322
D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87
Dunn KL, Kitching RL, Dexter EM (1994) The conservation status of Australian Butterflies. Unpublished report to Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra
Eastwood RG, Braby MF, Schmidt D, Hughes JM (2008) Taxonomy, ecology, genetics and conservation status of the pale imperial hairstreak (Jalmenus eubulus) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), a threatened butterfly from the Brigalow Belt, Australia. Invertebr Syst 22:407–423
Fenner TL (1991) A new subspecies of Euploea alcathoe (Godart) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Northern Territory, Australia. Aust Entomol Mag 18:149–155
Fenner TL (1992) Correction and addendum. Aust Entomol Mag 19:93
Franklin DC, Brocklehurst PS, Lynch D, Bowman DMJS (2007) Niche differentiation and regeneration in the seasonally flooded Melaleuca forests of northern Australia. J Trop Ecol 23:457–467
Hennessy KJ (2004) Climate change in the Northern Territory: consultancy report for the Northern Territory Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment. CSIRO, Division of Atmospheric Research, Climate Impact Group, Aspendale, Victoria
Hoffman BD (2004) Pest ants and their management on Aboriginal lands in the Northern Territory. A consultancy report prepared for the Northern Land Council. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Darwin
IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland
Kean L, Price O (2003) The extent of Mission grasses and Gamba Grass in the Darwin region of Australia’s Northern Territory. Pac Conserv Biol 8:281–290
Lambkin TA (2001) The life history of Euploea alcathoe monilifera (Moore) and its relationship to E. a. eichhorni Staudinger (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Danainae). Aust Entomol 28:129–136
Lewis OT, Basset Y (2007) Insect conservation in tropical forests. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. Proceedings of the royal entomological society’s 23rd symposium. CABI, Wallingford, pp 34–56
Liddle DT, Russell-Smith J, Brock J, Leach GJ, Connors GT (1994) Atlas of the vascular rainforest plants of the northern territory. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra
New TR (1991) Butterfly conservation. Oxford University Press, Melbourne
New TR (1992) Conservation of butterflies in Australia. J Res Lepid 29:237–253
New TR (1995) Butterfly conservation in Australasia—an emerging awareness and an increasing need. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 304–315
New TR (1996) Evaluating the status of butterflies for conservation. In: Ae SA, Hirowatari T, Ishii M, Brower LP (eds) Decline and conservation of butterflies in Japan III. Lepidopterological Society of Japan, Osaka, pp 4–21
New TR (1997) Are lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group’ for biodiversity conservation? J Insect Conserv 1:5–12
New TR (2008) Conserving narrow range endemic insects in the face of climate change: options for some Australian butterflies. J Insect Conserv 12:585–589
New TR, Sands DPA (1996) Progress in butterfly conservation in Australia. In: Ae SA, Hirowatari T, Ishii M, Brower LP (eds) Decline and conservation of butterflies in Japan III. Lepidopterological Society of Japan, Osaka, pp 116–127
New TR, Sands DPA (2002) Narrow-range endemicity and conservation status: interpretations for Australian butterflies. Invertebr Syst 16:665–670
New TR, Sands DPA (2003) The listing and de-listing of invertebrate species for conservation in Australia. J Insect Conserv 7:199–205
New TR, Sands DPA (2004) Management of threatened insect species in Australia, with particular reference to butterflies. Aust J Entomol 43:258–270
New TR, Yen AL (1995) Species management and recovery plans for butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Australia. In: Bennett A, Backhouse G, Clark T (eds) People and nature conservation. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, pp 15–21
New TR, Pyle RM, Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Hammond PC (1995) Butterfly conservation management. Annu Rev Entomol 40:57–83
New TR, Field RP, Sands DPA (2007) Victoria’s butterflies in a national conservation context. Vic Nat 124:243–249
Panton WJ (1993) Changes in post World War 2 distribution and status of monsoon rainforests in the Darwin area. Aust Geogr 24:50–59
Parsons MJ (1984) The biology and conservation of Ornithoptera alexandrae. In: Ackery PA, Vane-Wright RI (eds) The biology of butterflies. Symposium of the royal entomological society of London, number 11. Academic Press, London, pp 327–331
Parsons MJ (1992a) The butterfly farming and trading industry in the Indo-Australian region and its role in tropical forest conservation. Trop Lepid 3(suppl 1):1–31
Parsons MJ (1992b) The world’s largest butterfly endangered: the ecology, status and conservation of Ornithoptera alexandrae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Trop Lepid 3(suppl 1):33–60
Rossiter NA, Setterfield AA, Douglas MM, Hutley LB (2003) Testing the grass-fire cycle: alien grass invasion in the tropical savannas of northern Australia. Divers Distrib 9:169–176
Russell-Smith J (1991) Classification, species richness, and environmental relations of monsoon rain forest in northern Australia. J Veg Sci 2:259–278
Russell-Smith J, Bowman DMJS (1992) Conservation of monsoonal vine-forest isolates in the Northern Territory, Australia. Biol Conserv 59:51–63
Samways MJ (2005) Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sands DPA (1999) Conservation status of Lepidoptera: assessment, threatening processes and recovery actions. In: Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 382–387
Sands DPA, New TR (2002) The action plan for Australian butterflies. Environment Australia, Canberra
Skeat AJ, East TJ, Corbett LK (1996) Impact of feral water buffalo. In: Finlayson CM, von Oertzen I (eds) Landscape and vegetation ecology of the Kakadu region, northern Australia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 155–177
Standards and Petitions Working Group (2006) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 6.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland
Warren MS, Bourn N, Brereton T, Fox R, Middlebrook I, Parsons MS (2007) What have red lists done for us? The values and limitations of protected species listing for invertebrates. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. Proceedings of the royal entomological society’s 23 symposium. CABI, Wallingford, pp 76–91
Wilson C (2003) Carn the crows! Working with an Aboriginal community to protect an endangered butterfly. 34th Australian entomological society and 6th invertebrate biodiversity and conservation combined conference, Hobart
Wilson BA, Brocklehurst PS, Clark MJ, Dickinson KJM (1990) Vegetation survey of the northern Territory. Technical report number 49. Land Conservation Unit, Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory, Palmerston
Woinarski JCZ, Mackey B, Nix HA, Traill B (2007) The nature of northern Australia: its natural values, ecological processes and future prospects. ANU E Press, Canberra
Yen AL, Butcher RJ (1997) An overview of the conservation of non-marine invertebrates in Australia. Environment Australia, Canberra
Young GR, Bellis GA, Brown GR, Smith ESC (2001) The crazy ant Anoplolepis gracilipes (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in east Arnhem Land, Australia. Aust Entomol 28:97–104
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Dieter Hinz, Ben Hoffman, Geoff Martin, Ian Morris, Phil Wise, Colin Wilson and Lyndsay Wilson for biological information on the distribution, habitats and threats of the Gove Crow butterfly and/or its habitat, and to Steve Roeger, Djawa Yunupingu, Phil Wise, David Preece, Daniel Barrow and Wanyubi Marika for logistical support. The Yolngu traditional owners Bundi Bundi, Dhaukal Wirrpanda and Mulayarpa Mununggurr, the Dhimurru indigenous rangers Banula Marika, Balupalu Yunupingu and Mandaka Marika, and the Laynhapuy indigenous rangers Yalapuru Gumana, Yinimala Gumana, Gadarri Mununggurr, Djudawit Mununggurr, Bandumul Munyarryun, Yalpi Yunupingu, Gamanara Wunungmurra, Rrumbi Wunungmurra and Bandarr Wirrpanda provided assistance with field work and access to their lands. Ian Morris, Phil Wise, David Preece, Lyndsay Wilson and Steven Gregg also assisted with field work. I thank John Woinarski and Chris Pavey for critically reading earlier drafts of the manuscript and for their perceptive comments. Funding for this work was provided for by the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Priority conservation management actions for Euploea alcathoe enastri.
-
1.
Development and involvement of local indigenous rangers. All sites of E. alcathoe enastri occur on private lands owned by the Yolngu Aboriginal people of north-eastern Arnhem Land. Indeed, some sites surveyed were classed as ‘sacred sites’ that can only be accessed in the presence of senior traditional owners. Much of the range of the butterfly lies within the Indigenous Protected Areas: subpopulations 6–8 occur on lands managed by Dhimurru Land Management Aboriginal Corporation (DLMAC), while subpopulations 3–5 and 9–11 fall under the management of the Yirralka Laynhapuy Rangers. Subpopulations 1 and 2 occur in non-protected areas and fall within the jurisdiction of the Gapuwiyak Aboriginal Community, which currently does not have a local indigenous ranger group. Successful long-term conservation management of the butterfly and its critical habitat is thus dependent on cooperation of traditional landowners and involvement of the two local indigenous ranger groups.
-
2.
Education, community awareness and fire management. The wet monsoon forest patches on Gove Peninsula contain a suite of resources that are of cultural and spiritual significance to the Yolngu community. These resources include food, timber, fibre, medicine and spears, but the forests also comprise an important place for dreaming stories and spirits. There is an urgent need to ensure that customary knowledge is not lost but passed on from senior traditional owners to the next generation. A program needs to be established in which elders and community leaders are employed to gather, teach, disseminate and transfer cultural skills and knowledge. Such a program would include traditional burning practices, ethnobotany, hunting techniques and traditional dances, as well as the conservation needs of E. alcathoe enastri and its critical habitat. This may be the only way to ensure that the overall burning pattern is not disrupted because there is evidence that severe habitat modification is already occurring at some sites through altered fire regime.
-
3.
Monitoring to assess threats. Although habitat disturbance by feral animals (buffalo, pig) is currently not significant, monitoring of known sites is recommended to detect possible changes in severity by these animals, as well as to detect potential threats such as invasion of grassy weeds and Yellow Crazy Ants. In addition, the butterfly has the potential to be used as an indicator taxon to assess general environmental health because of its ecological specialisation. Adults of E. alcathoe enastri are large, spectacular and readily identified in the field. Therefore, changes in its occurrence and abundance may reflect adverse changes to the general health of its critical habitat as a whole. Such a monitoring programme could be achieved by visually assessing and digitally recording habitat condition within selected sites on an annual basis by two rangers. Because of the low topographic relief of Gove Peninsula, monitoring is also needed to assess possible long-term environmental changes in sea-level, temperature and water table brought about by global climate change.
-
4.
Control of exotic species. At present there is no control program of water buffalo and feral pig on Gove Peninsula. Should these threats become significant, a feral animal control strategy will be needed, which should be undertaken by the indigenous ranger groups with support from the Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Service (P&WS). Perennial Mission Grass and Gamba Grass have the potential to invade and become serious weed problems on Gove Peninsula, and control and eradication of known infestations and the need to maintain vigilance against new outbreaks are therefore high priorities. Survey, monitoring and control of Yellow Crazy Ant is currently been undertaken on Gove Peninsula by the Crazy Ant Management Group coordinated by CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, DLMAC, P&WS of the Northern Territory Government, the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and Northern Land Council, with funding from the Natural Heritage Trust. Due to the size and extent of the infestation the program has now shifted its focus from eradication to methods for control and containment (B. Hoffman, pers. comm.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braby, M.F. Conservation status and management of the Gove Crow Euploea alcathoe enastri (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), a threatened tropical butterfly from the indigenous Aboriginal lands of north-eastern Arnhem Land, Australia. J Insect Conserv 14, 535–554 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9282-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9282-6