Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dual-site epicardial left ventricular (LV) pacing represents one strategy to improve acute cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. However, the feasibility of this approach in the longer term may be hindered by system complexity. We assessed chronic outcomes of patients receiving dual-site LV pacing.

Methods

Twenty patients with conventional CRT criteria were implanted with dual-site epicardial LV leads connected with bifurcating adapter. Mean energy required to capture the LV was calculated using threshold, impedance and pulse width. Values were obtained during implant and the following day. Follow-up data included lead parameters, ventricular arrhythmias and mortality.

Results

Nineteen patients had successful dual LV lead placement. Mean age was 66 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 26 % ± 8 and 50 % ischemic etiology. Mean energy to capture the LV was 1.95 μJ for LV1 during implant, rising to 8.61 μJ at day 1, p = 0.03. The energy required for LV2 was 2.37 μJ during implant, 11.55 μJ the next day, p = 0.004. Eleven percent had LV2 turned off during the implant due to high thresholds and/or a worsened acute hemodynamic response. Eleven percent had LV2 turned off day 1 post implant due to inability to capture LV2 at maximum output. All remaining 15 patients had LV2 programmed off, with a mean time of 255 days from implant. Thirty-two percent of patients received ATP or shock, and sixteen percent died over a mean follow-up of 1271 days. Thirty-seven percent of patients required generator replacement with mean longevity of 42 months, far shorter than the suggested lifespan of the device (58 months), p = 0.006.

Conclusion

Multisite epicardial LV lead placement may be acutely feasible and demonstrate beneficial hemodynamic results at implantation. Long-term delivery of this therapy is however problematic due to technical issues with pacing through the bifurcating adapter. This suggests the feasibility of this form of multisite CRT is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleland, J. F. G., Daubert, J.-C., Erdnabb, E., Freemantle, E., Gras, D., Kappenberger, L., Tavazzi, L., & CARE-HF Study Investigators. (2005). The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 1539–1549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cazeau, S., Leclercq, C., Lavergne, T., Walker, S., Varma, C., Linde, C., et al. (2001). Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(12), 873–880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., Krueger, S., Kass, D. A., De Marco, T., et al. (2004). Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(21), 2140–2150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Derval, N., Steendijk, P., Gula, L. J., Deplagne, A., Laborderie, J., Sacher, F., et al. (2010). Optimizing hemodynamics inHeart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55(6), 566–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leclercq, C., & Kass, D. A. (2002). Retiming the failing heart: principles and current clinical status of cardiac resynchronization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 39(2), 194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mullens, W., Grimm, R. A., Verga, T., Dresing, T., Starling, R. C., Wilkoff, B. L., & Tang, W. H. W. (2009). Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(9), 765–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleeker, G. B. (2006). Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation, 113(7), 969–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, F. Z., Virdee, M. S., Palmer, C. R., Pugh, P. J., O’Halloran, D., Elsik, M., et al. (2012). Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59(17), 1509–1518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adelstein, E., Alam, M. B., Schwartzman, D., Jain, S., Marek, J., Gorcsan, J., & Saba, S. (2014). Effect of echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy on mortality and risk of defibrillator therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients (from the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region [STARTER] trial). The American Journal of Cardiology, 113(9), 1518–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ploux, S., Strik, M., van Hunnik, A., van Middendorp, L., Kuiper, M., & Prinzen, F. W. (2014). Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart. Heart Rhythm, 11(1), 119–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lenarczyk, R., Kowalski, O., Kukulski, T., Pruszkowska-Skrzep, P., Sokal, A., Szulik, M., et al. (2009). Mid-term outcomes of triple-site vs. conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: a preliminary study. International Journal of Cardiology, 133(1), 87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenarczyk, R., Kowalski, O., Kukulski, T., Szulik, M., Pruszkowska-Skrzep, P., Zielinska, T., et al. (2007). Triple-site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a feasibility study. Europace, 9(9), 762–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leclercq, C., Gadler, F., Kranig, W., Ellery, S., Gras, D., Lazarus, A., et al. (2008). A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51(15), 1455–1462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers, D. P. S., Lambiase, P. D., Lowe, M. D., & Chow, A. W. C. (2014). A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure, 14(5), 495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginks, M. R., Duckett, S. G., Kapetanakis, S., Bostock, J., Hamid, S., Shetty, A., et al. (2012). Multi-site left ventricular pacing as a potential treatment for patients with postero-lateral scar: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive haemodynamic assessment. Europace, 14(3), 373–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sohal, M., Duckett, S. G., Zhuang, X., Shi, W., Ginks, M., Shetty, A., et al. (2014). A prospective evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of dyssynchrony in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16(1), 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ypenburg, C., Roes, S. D., Bleeker, G. B., Kaandorp, T. A. M., de Roos, A., Schalij, M. J., et al. (2007). Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 99(5), 657–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, J. P., Klein, H. U., Huang, D. T., Reek, S., Kuniss, M., Quesada, A., et al. (2011). Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation, 123(11), 1159–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SJM CRM. (2007). Frontier™ II Model 5586 Model 5596, Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Device with AF Suppression™ Algorithm User’s Manual© 2007

  20. SJM CRM. Atlas® II Models V-168, V-265, V-365 Atlas® II+ Models V-268, V-366 Cardiac Resynchronization Device, Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator User’s Manual © 2007

  21. SJM. CRM. Bradycardia and Tachycardia Devices Merlin™ Patient Care System Help Manual. [For the following devices: Accent™, Accent™ RF, Accent™ ST, Accent ™ ST MRI Allure™, Allure Quadra™, Allure Quadra™ RF, Allure™ RF AnalyST™, AnalyST Accel™ Anthem™, Anthem™ RF Assurity™, Assurity™ + Auricle™ Current™, Current™ RF, Current™+, Current Accel™ Ellipse™ Endurity™ Fortify™, Fortify™ ST, Fortify Assura™ Promote™, Promote™ RF, Promote™+, Promote™ LAP, Promote Accel™, Promote™ Q, Promote Quadra™ Quadra Allure MP™, Quadra Allure MP™ RF, Quadra Assura™, Quadra Assura MP™ Unify™, Unify Quadra™, Unify Quadra MP™, Unify Assura™] 2014 St. Jude Medical, Inc.

  22. Shetty, A. K., Duckett, S. G., Bostock, J., Roy, D., Ginks, M., Hamid, S., et al. (2011). Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology: PACE, 34(4), 484–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forleo, G. B., Rocca Della, D. G., Papavasileiou, L. P., Molfetta, A. D., Santini, L., & Romeo, F. (2011). Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm, 8(1), 31–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sperzel, J., Dänschel, W., Gutleben, K.-J., Kranig, W., Mortensen, P., Connelly, D., et al. (2012). First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead. Europace, 14(3), 365–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomassoni, G., Baker, J., Corbisiero, R., Love, C., Martin, D., Niazi, I., et al. (2013). Postoperative performance of the quartet ®left ventricular heart lead. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24(4), 449–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shetty, A. K., Duckett, S. G., Ma, Y. L., Kapetanakis, S., Ginks, M., Bostock, J., et al. (2012). The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35(2), 196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Asbach, S., Hartmann, M., Wengenmayer, T., Graf, E., Bode, C., & Biermann, J. (2013). Vector selection of a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead affects acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized cross-over trial. PloS One, 8(6), e67235.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pappone, C., Calović, Z., Vicedomini, G., Cuko, A., McSpadden, L. C., Ryu, K., et al. (2014). Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm, 11(3), 394–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Niederer, S. A., Shetty, A. K., Plank, G., Bostock, J., Razavi, R., Smith, N. P., & Rinaldi, C. A. (2011). Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35(2), 204–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JMB acknowledges support from the Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust and the Rosetrees Trust. MG, MS and SC have received educational grants from St Jude Medical Ltd. TJ has received a research grant from Medtronic. CAR is consultant to St Jude Medical Ltd, Medtronic and Spectranetics and receives research funding from St Jude Medical and Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Behar.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix S1

Individual patient capture threshold voltages for LV1 and LV2 demonstrating a large variation between cases. (DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behar, J.M., Bostock, J., Ginks, M. et al. Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 42, 135–142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9971-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9971-2

Keywords

Navigation