Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) have been recalled due to increased risk of insulation failure leading to externalized cables. As this mechanical failure does not necessarily correlate with electrical failure, it can be difficult to diagnose. Fluoroscopic screening can identify insulation failure. Studies have suggested that insulation failure is predominantly seen in 8-Fr, single-coil models. Our patients have exclusively dual-coil leads and a high proportion of 7-Fr leads.

Methods

Fluoroscopic screening was performed in 48 patients with recalled Riata leads. Twenty-three patients had 8-Fr Riata leads and 25 patients had 7-Fr Riata ST leads. Images were recorded in at least three projections and studies were reviewed by seven attending electrophysiologists.

Results

Externalized cables were seen in ten patients (21 %), and another five patients (10 %) had abnormal cable spacing. All device interrogations showed normal parameters. Patients with abnormal leads had more leads in situ (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 leads; P = 0.002) and a higher rate of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (80 vs. 24 %; P = 0.03). There were no differences between the groups with regards to patient age, body mass index, lead age, lead parameters, or vascular access site. There was no difference with regard to lead size (P = 0.76).

Conclusions

The Riata family of leads has a high incidence of mechanical failure, as demonstrated on fluoroscopic screening. In this study, the 7-Fr models were just as likely to mechanically fail as the 8-Fr models. Increasing lead burden and a diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy correlated with insulation failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. St. Jude Medical (2011). FDA classifies voluntary physician advisory letter on Riata and Riata ST silicone defibrillation leads as class I recall (URGENT MEDICAL DEVICE ADVISORY), December 15, 2011. http://investors.sjm.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=73836&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1640339. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  2. Hauser, R. G., McGriff, D., & Retel, L. K. (2012). Riata implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead failure: Analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect. Heart Rhythm, 9, 742–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chester, K.M. (2010). Important information about Riata and Riata ST silicone endocardial leads, December 15, 2010. http://www.sjmprofessional.com/Resources/communications/important-information-about-riata-and-riata-st-silicone-endocardial-leads.aspx. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  4. Kresbsbach, A., Alhumaid, F., Henrikson, C. A., Calkins, H., Berger, R. D., & Cheng, A. (2011). Premature failure of a Riata defibrillator lead without impedance change or inappropriate sensing: A case report and review of the literature. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 22, 1070–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duray, G. Z., Israel, C. W., Schmitt, J., & Hohnloser, S. H. (2008). Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead disintegration at the level of the tricuspid valve. Heart Rhythm, 5, 1224–1225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jalal, Z., Derval, N., Ploux, S., & Bordachar, P. (2010). Unusual failure of a multilumen, small-diameter implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead. Heart Rhythm, 7, 1166–1167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmutz, M., Delacretaz, E., Schwick, N., Roten, L., Fuhrer, J., Boesch, C., Tanner, H. (2012). Prevalence of asymptomatic and electrically undetectable intracardiac inside-out abrasion in silicon-coated Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads. International Journal of Cardiology. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.076

  8. Erkapic, D., Duray, G. Z., Bauernfeind, T., De Rosa, S., & Hohnloser, S. H. (2011). Insulation defects of thin high-voltage ICD leads: An underestimated problem. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 22, 1018–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kodoth, V., Cromie, N., Lau, E., McEneaney, D., Wilson, C., Roberts, M.J. (2011). Riata lead failure: A report from Northern Ireland Riata lead screening programme. http://spo.escardio.org/AbstractDetails.aspx?id=98075&eevtid=48. Accessed 7 March 2012.

  10. Carlson, M., Tsung, P. (2011). Medical device advisory: Important product information update, November 28, 2011. http://www.riatacommunication.com/riata-us.aspx. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  11. St. Jude Medical. (2012). Riata® lead programming and monitoring considerations, May 25, 2012. http://www.riatacommunication.com/us/physician-information.aspx. Accessed 6 June 2012.

  12. Parvathaneni, V., Ellis, C.R., Rottman, J.N. (2012). High prevalence of insulation failure with externalized cables in St. Jude Medical Riata family ICD leads: Fluoroscopic grading scale and correlation to extracted leads. Heart Rhythm, 9(8), 1218–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, S., Bhave, P., Giedrimas, E., Patel, T., Arora, R., Chicos, A.B., Goldberger, J.J., Ilkhanoff, L., Kim, M.H., Lin, A.C., Passman, R., Lee, R., Knight, B.P., Kim, S.S. (2012). Prevalence and predictors of cable extrusion and loss of electrical integrity with the Riata defibrillator lead. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23(11), 1207–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hauser, R. (2012). Here we go again: Another failure of postmarketing device surveillance. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Rees, J. B., Van Welsenes, G. H., Borleffs, C. J., Thijssen, J., Van Der Velde, E. T., Van Der Wall, E. E., Van Erven, L., & Schalij, M. J. (2012). Update on small-diameter implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads performance. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leong, D. P., & Erven, L. V. (2012). Unrecognized failure of a narrow caliber defibrillation lead: The role of defibrillation threshold testing in identifying an unprotected individual. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Birnie, D. H., Parkash, R., & Exner, D. (2012). Clinical predictors of Fidelis lead failure: A report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee. Circulation, 125, 1217–1225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. FDA. (2012). FDA safety communication: Premature insulation failure in recalled Riata implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads manufactured by St. Jude Medical, Inc., August 16, 2012. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AltertsandNotices/ucm314930.htm. Accessed 24 October 2012.

  19. Krahn, A. D., & Gould, P. A. (2006). Complications associated with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 1907–1911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kay, G. N., Brinker, J. A., Kawanishi, D. T., Love, C. J., Lloyd, M. A., Reeves, R. C., Pioger, G., Fee, J., Overland, M. K., Ensign, L. G., & Grunkemeier, G. L. (1999). Risks of spontaneous injury and extraction of an active fixation pacemaker lead: Report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry. Circulation, 100, 2344–2352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

JPD received grants and consulting fees from Boston Scientific and St. Jude Medical. KB received grants from St. Jude Medical. JDF received grants and consulting fees from St. Jude Medical. JMM received grants and consulting fees from St. Jude Medical. SK received grants from Boston Scientific and Biotronik. PM received grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. LPM, JRM, RM, and AD have no disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela K. Mason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moorman, L.P., Moorman, J.R., DiMarco, J.P. et al. Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 37, 63–68 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9760-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9760-8

Keywords

Navigation