Abstract
The atomic hypothesis according to Ludwig Boltzmann. The scientific and philosophical importance of a controversial position at the close of the 19th century. This paper examines Boltzmann’s standpoint in the controversy over the existence of atoms between himself on the one hand and Mach, Ostwald, Helm and to some extent Duhem on the other hand. The latter wanted to develop a physics only constructed with perceptible phenomena. Because of the lack of empirical evidence of the atoms at that time they did not accept them for the construction of physics. In contrast, Boltzmann found the acceptance of atoms to be a fruitful assumption, since for him the construction of physics required going beyond perceptible phenomena. Two different conceptions of nature and of the ways to know nature clashed in this disagreement between Boltzmann and his opponents. Op-posing one-sided positions, Boltzmann supported the hypothetical character of science, in which more than one basic hypothesis can be advanced: he was open to the possibility of fundamental revolutions in science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literaturverzeichnis
Boltzmann, L.: 1905, Populäre Schriften, Leipzig.
Boltzmann, L.: 1981, Vorlesungen über Gastheorie, I. u. II. Teil in einem Band, hg. v. R.U. Sexl, Graz/Braunschweig, (1. Aufl., Leipzig, 1896–1898).
Boltzmann, L.: 1990, Principien der Naturfilosofi, hg. v. I.M. Fasol-Boltzmann, Berlin.
Brush, S. G.: 1970, ‘Boltzmann, Ludwig’, in C. C. Gillispie (Hg.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, New York, 2. Bd., 260–268.
Brush, S. G.: 1981, “Einleitung”, in L. Boltzmann, Vorlesungen über Gastheorie, Graz/Braunschweig, 7*–71*.
Brush, S. G.: 1986, The Kind of Motion we call Heat. A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century, 2 Bde., Amsterdam, (1. Aufl., 1976).
Helm, G.: 1898, Die Energetik nach ihrer geschichtlichen Entwickelung, Leipzig.
Hertz, H., 1894, Untersuchungen über die Ausbreitung der elektrischen Kraft, Leipzig, (1. Aufl., 1891).
Mach, E.: 1919, Die Principien der Wärmelehre, Leipzig, (1. Aufl., 1896).
Ostwald, F. W.: 1926–1927, Lebenslinien, 3 Bde., Berlin.
Scheibe, E.: 2000, ‘The Origin of Scientific Realism: Boltzmann, Planck, Einstein’ in E. Aggazzi und M. Pauri (Hgg.), The Reality of the Unobservable, Dordrecht, 31–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tutor, J.I.G. Die Atomistik bei Ludwig Boltzmann. Zur wissenschaftlichen und philosophischen Bedeutung einer kontroversen Position am Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts. J Gen Philos Sci 35, 371–384 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-004-0928-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-004-0928-5