Abstract
This study drew on longitudinal, nationally representative data to estimate rural–urban inequality in women’s access to family-friendly benefits. Multivariate fixed effects regression models showed that compared to urban women, rural women’s odds of reporting access were 11 % lower for flexible work scheduling, 24 % lower for job-protected maternity leave, 13 % lower for paid sick time, 21 % lower for vacation time, and 20 % lower for health insurance. The rural–urban gap in sick time was explained by differences in unionization, as rural women were less likely to be unionized than urban women. Our findings suggest that rural women’s work–family experiences may be more constrained than urban women’s work–family experiences.
Notes
For simplicity, we use the term “urban” throughout to signify the non-rural population. Note that our use of urban also includes suburban residents. Although the dataset that we analyze, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) provides information on urban, rural, and suburban area of residence, this information can only be gathered from a variable that has a large percentage of missing cases. We used a different variable on rural/urban that groups suburban with urban, but it has far fewer missing cases. We provide details on these definitions in the method section of this paper.
We included access to health insurance in our analyses because it reduces absenteeism (Lofland and Frick 2006) and may provide workers with greater flexibility in balancing work and family.
References
Allison, P. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. New York, NY: Sage.
Baughman, R., DiNardi, D., & Holtz-Eakin, D. (2003). Productivity and wage effects of family-friendly fringe benefits. International Journal of Manpower, 24(3), 247–259. doi:10.1108/01437720310479723.
Bennett, D. A. (2001). How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(5), 464–469. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x.
Best, M. H. (1993). The new competition: Institutions of industrial restructuring. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bloomquist, L. E. (1990). Local labor market characteristics and the occupational concentration of different sociodemographic groups. Rural Sociology, 55(1), 119–213. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00680.x
Bokemeier, J. L., & Tickamyer, A. R. (1985). Labor force experiences of nonmetropolitan women. Rural Sociology, 50(1), 51–73.
Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., Kim, S. S., & Brownfield, E. (2005). National study of employers. New York: Families and Work Institute.
Caputo, R. K. (2000). Race and marital history as correlates of women’s access to family-friendly employee benefits. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(4), 365–385. doi:10.1023/A:1026480621340.
Carter, J. S., & Borch, C. A. (2005). Assessing the effects of urbanism and regionalism on gender-role attitudes, 1974–1998. Sociological Inquiry, 75(4), 548–563. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00136.x.
Cotter, Daniel A., DeFiore, J., Hermsen, J. M., Marsteller Kowalewski, B., & Vanneman, R. (1996). Gender inequality in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan US. Rural Sociology, 61(2), 272–288. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00620.x.
Davis, A. E., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2006). Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations, 33(2), 191–223. doi:10.1177/0730888405280446.
DiPrete, T. A. (1993). Industrial restructuring and the mobility response of American workers in the 1980s. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 74–96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096219.
Duncan, C. M. (1999). Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Firestone, J., Harris, R. J., & Lambert, L. C. (1999). Gender role ideology and the gender based differences in earnings. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20(2), 191–215. doi:10.1023/A:1022158811154.
Glass, J., & Camarigg, V. (1992). Gender, parenthood, and job-family compatibility. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 131–151. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781195.
Glass, J., & Estes, S. B. (1997). The family responsive workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 289–313. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.289.
Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies. Work and Occupations, 22(4), 380–411. doi:10.1177/0730888495022004002.
Glass, J., & Riley, L. (1998). Family responsive policies and employee retention following childbirth. Social Forces, 76(4), 1401–1435. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3005840.
Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them? American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1157–1178. doi:10.1177/00027640121956700.
Golden, L. (2008). Limited access: Disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), 86–109. doi:10.1007/s10834-007-9090-7.
Golden, L. (2009). Flexible daily work schedules in US jobs: Formal introductions needed? Industrial Relations, 48(1), 27–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00544.x.
Graves, P. E., Sexton, R. L., & Arthur, M. M. (1999). Amenities and fringe benefits: Omitted variable bias. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(3), 399–404. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3487770.
Guthrie, D., & Roth, L. M. (1999). The state, courts, and maternity policies in US organizations: Specifying institutional mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 64(1), 41–63. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657277.
Hollister, M. N. (2005). Does firm size matter anymore? The new economy and firm size wage effects. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 659–676. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593033.
Hudson, K. (2007). The new labor market segmentation: Labor market dualism in the new economy. Social Science Research, 36(1), 286–312. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X06000068.
Johnson, K. M., & Fuguitt, G. V. (2000). Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology, 65(1), 27–49. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00341.x.
Johnson, K. M., Voss, P. R., Hammer, R. B., Fuguitt, G. V., & McNiven, S. (2005). Temporal and spatial variation in age-specific net migration in the US. Demography, 42(4), 791–812. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4147340.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., & Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the US. American Sociological Review, 65(2), 256–278. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657440.
Kalleberg, A. L., Reynolds, J., & Marsden, P. V. (2003). Externalizing employment: Flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Social Science Research, 32(3), 525–552. doi:10.1093/SER/mwi017.
Kalleberg, A. L., & Van Buren, M. E. (1996). Is bigger better? Explaining the relationship between organization size and job rewards. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 47–66. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096406.
Kneebone, E., & Berube, A. (2013). Confronting suburban poverty in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lichter, D. T. (1989). The underemployment of American rural women: Prevalence, trends, and spatial inequality. Journal of Rural Studies, 5(2), 199–208. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0743016789900466.
Lichter, D. T., & Jensen, L. (2002). Rural America in transition: Poverty and welfare at the turn of the 21st century. In B. Weber, G. Duncan, & L. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions of welfare reform (pp. 77–110). Kalamazoo, Michigan: W. E. Upjohn Institute.
Lofland, J. H., & Frick, K. D. (2006). Effect of health insurance on workplace absenteeism in the US workforce. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48(1), 13–21. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16404205.
Lowen, A., & Sicilian, P. (2009). Family friendly fringe benefits and the gender wage gap. Journal of Labor Research, 30(2), 101–119. doi:10.1007/s12122-008-9046-1.
Lyson, T. A., & Falk, W. W. (1993). Forgotten places: Uneven development in rural America. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
MacDermid, S. M., Herzog, J. L., Kensinger, K. B., & Zipp, J. F. (2001). The role of organizational size and industry in job quality and work–family relationships. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 191–216. doi:10.1023/A:1016634330537.
McLaughlin, D. K. (2002). Changing income inequality in nonmetropolitan counties, 1980 to 1990. Rural Sociology, 64(4), 512–533. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00117.x.
McLaughlin, D. K., & Coleman-Jensen, A. J. (2008). Nonstandard employment in the nonmetropolitan United States. Rural Sociology, 73(4), 631–659. doi:10.1526/003601108786471558.
McLaughlin, D. K., & Perman, L. (1991). Returns vs. endowments in the earnings attainment process for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan women. Rural Sociology, 56(3), 339–365. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00438.x.
Mishel, L., & Frankel, D. M. (1991). The state of working America. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Orloff, A. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. doi:10.2307/2095903.
Osterman, P. (1995). Work family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 681–700.
Osterman, P. (1999). Securing prosperity: The American labor market: how it has changed and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. R. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Roehling, P. V., Roehling, M. V., & Moen, P. (2001). The relationship between work-life policies and practices and employee loyalty: A life course perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 141–170. doi:10.1023/A:1016630229628.
Rural Sociological Society (RSS) Task Force. (1993). Persistent poverty in rural America. Boulder: Westview.
Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15. doi:10.1177/096228029900800102.
Schmidt, J. (2007). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Job quality in the United States over the three most recent business cycles. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/goodjobscycles.pdf.
Singelmann, J., & Browning, H. L. (1980). Industrial transformation and occupational change in the US, 1960–1970. Social Forces, 59(1), 246–264. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2577843.
Smith, K. E., & Glauber, R. (2013). Exploring the spatial wage penalty for women: Does it matter where you live? Social Science Research, 42(5), 1390–1401. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.006.
Struthers, C. B., & Bokemeier, J. L. (2003). Stretched to their limits: Rural mothers, the ‘New’ economy, and the rural work ethic. In A. Tickamyer, W. Falk, & M. Schulman (Eds.), Communities of work: Rural restructuring in local and global contexts (pp. 291–315). Athens: Ohio University Press.
Swanberg, J. E., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Drescher-Burke, K. (2005). A question of justice: Disparities in employees’ access to flexible schedule arrangements. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 866–895. doi:10.1177/0192513X05277554.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Employer costs for employee compensation. Washington, DC.
US Census Bureau. (1994). Geographic areas reference manual. Washington, DC.
US Census Bureau. (2004). United states summary: (2000). Washington, DC: Population and housing counts.
US Department of Agriculture. (2002). Rural America at a glance. Economic Research Service: Rural Development Research Report No. (RDRR94-1). Washington, DC.
US Department of Agriculture. (2009). Rural America at a glance. Economic Research Service: Economic Information Bulletin Number 59. Washington, DC.
US Department of Labor. (2004). Workers on flexible and shift schedules. Washington, DC.
US Department of Labor. (2006). National compensation survey: employee benefits in private industry in the United States. Washington, DC.
US Government Accountability Office. (2006). Employee compensation. GAO-06-285. Washington, DC.
Variyam, J. N., & Kraybill, D. S. (1998). Fringe benefits provision by rural small businesses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(2), 360–368. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1244508.
Weeden, K. A. (2005). Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the US. Social Science Research, 34(2), 454–482. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X04000407.
Wells, B. (2002). Women’s voices: Explaining poverty and plenty in a rural community. Rural Sociology, 67(2), 234–254. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00102.x .
Young, J. R., & Smith, K. (2014). The changing etho-racial gap in family-friendly ‘fringe’ benefits, 1997–2008. Boston, MA: Research Presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glauber, R., Young, J.R. On the Fringe: Family-Friendly Benefits and the Rural–Urban Gap Among Working Women. J Fam Econ Iss 36, 97–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9418-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9418-z