Family Structure, Policy Shocks, and Family Business Adjustment Choices
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This research used survey data collected between 2005 and 2006 in rural Kentucky to empirically investigate how different types of rural households in Kentucky cope with the changes in economic environment during the post-tobacco buyout by employing two different family business models, the Agricultural Household Model and the Sustainable Family Business Model. Data were analyzed using a multinomial probit model. The results indicate that multi-generational households were more likely to invest in low risk investments and less likely to employ a family member off-farm than couples with young children. Therefore, family structure plays an important part in the types of adjustment strategies chosen by farm families. The results also indicate that the Sustainable Family Business Model is a better predictor of the observed correlation between family structure and family farms’ choices of adaptation strategies.
- Alderman, H, Chiappori, P-A, Haddad, L, Hoddinott, J (1995) Unitary versus collective models of the household: Is it time to shift the burden of proof?. World Bank Research Observer 10: pp. 1-10 CrossRef
- Amarapurkar, SS, Danes, SM (2005) Farm business-owning couples: Interrelationships among business tensions, relationship conflict quality, and spousal satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 26: pp. 419-441 CrossRef
- Beach, RH, Jones, AS, Tooze, JA (2008) Tobacco farmer interest and success in income diversification. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40: pp. 53-71
- Beach, RH, Richmond, DW, Austin, WD, Jones, AS (2006) How will tobacco farmers respond to the quota buyout? Findings from a survey of North Carolina tobacco farmers. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL
- Chaulk, B, Johnson, PJ, Bulcroft, R (2003) Effects of marriage and children on financial risk tolerance: A synthesis of family development and prospect theory. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 24: pp. 257-279 CrossRef
- Janvry, A, Fafchamps, M, Sadoulet, E (1991) Peasant household behavior with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. The Economic Journal 101: pp. 1400-1417 CrossRef
- Economic Research Service. (2010). Data set. State fact sheets: Kentucky. Retrieved April 5, 2009, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/StateFacts/KY.htm.
- Foreman, L. (2005). Production costs and returns for tobacco in 2003. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Electronic outlook report TBS-258-01. Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/TBS//2000s/2005/TBS-05-13-2005_Special_Report.pdf.
- Foreman, L. (2006). Production costs and returns for tobacco in 2004. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Electronic outlook report TBS-260-01. Retrieved May 17, 2009 from http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/TBS//2000s/2006/TBS-08-04-2006_Special_Report.pdf.
- Gale, H. F., Jr., Foreman, L., & Capehart, T. (2000). Tobacco and the economy: farms, jobs, and communities. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic report no. 789.
- Jianakoplos, NA, Bernasek, A (2008) Family financial risk taking when the wife earns more. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 29: pp. 289-306 CrossRef
- Joo, S-H, Grable, JE (2004) An exploratory framework of the determinants of financial satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25: pp. 25-50 CrossRef
- Kumbhakar, SC, Bokusheva, R (2009) Modeling farm production decisions under an expenditure constraint. European Review of Agricultural Economics 36: pp. 343-367 CrossRef
- MacDonald, M, Koh, SK (2003) Consistent motives for inter-family transfers: Simple altruism. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 24: pp. 73-97 CrossRef
- Marshall, MI, Pushkarskaya, H (2008) What did they so with the money? An analysis of tobacco buyout recipients’ expenditure choices. Journal of Agribusiness 26: pp. 175-198
- Moen, P, Wethington, E (1992) The concept of family adaptive strategies. Annual Review of Sociology 18: pp. 233-251 CrossRef
- Pew Research Center Report. (2010). The return of the multi-generational family household. Retrieved March, 4, 2010, from http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/752/the-return-of-the-multi-generational-family-household.
- Powell, M, Ansic, D (1997) Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 18: pp. 605-628 CrossRef
- Sanders, CK, Porterfield, SL (2010) The ownership society and women: Exploring female householders’ ability to accumulate assets. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 31: pp. 90-106 CrossRef
- Scorsone, E. (2003). Encouraging entrepreneurship in rural communities: The University of Kentucky entrepreneurship initiative program. Journal of Extension, 41(6). Article 6IAW5 (on-line). Retrieved December, 7, 2008, from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2003december/iw5.shtml.
- Singh, I., Squire, L., & Strauss, J. (1986). A survey of agricultural household models: Recent findings and policy implications. The World Bank Economic Review, 1(1), 149–179.
- Snell, W. (2005). The buyout: Short-run observations and implications for Kentucky’s tobacco industry. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.
- Stafford, K, Duncan, KA, Dane, S, Winter, M (1999) A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review 12: pp. 197-208 CrossRef
- Taylor, JE, Adelman, I (2003) Agricultural household models: Genesis, evolution, and extensions. Review of Economics of the Household 1: pp. 35-58 CrossRef
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2008). Online database. Retrieved April 12, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/.
- Weigel, RR (1988) Coping with economic stress: Implications for helping professionals. Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues 9: pp. 367-382 CrossRef
- Yusof, SA, Duasa, J (2010) Household decision-making and expenditure patterns of married men and women in Malaysia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 31: pp. 371-381 CrossRef
- Family Structure, Policy Shocks, and Family Business Adjustment Choices
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Volume 31, Issue 4 , pp 414-426
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Adaptation strategies
- Family farms
- Tobacco buyout
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, 317 C.E. Barnhart Bldg., Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
- 2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 403 W. State Street, Lafayette, IN, 47909, USA