Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers making sense of result-oriented teams: A cognitive anthropological approach to educational change

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on educational change efforts abound but generally limit themselves to post hoc explanations of failure and success. Such explanations are rarely turned into attempts at providing models for predicting change outcomes. The present study tries to develop such a model based on the teachers’ impact analysis of a management-driven intervention, introducing new public management principles at a Dutch school for vocational education and training. The study uses a mixed method approach, the quantitative part of which encompasses the accomplishment of a cultural domain analysis. It appears that in this case the new public management ideology of result-oriented teacher teams contradicts substantial aspects of the existing teachers’ meaning system, and fails to meet not yet satisfied needs within the current meaning system. As a consequence, the relevance of a substantial number of the cognitions that constitute result-oriented teacher teams appears to be limited. The authors discuss the consequences for the chance to successfully change the teachers’ meaning system and draw conclusions that suggest a set of more general building blocks for assessing change policy plans and practices in educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ROTT:

Result-oriented teacher team

References

  • Akkerman, S., Van Den Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, P. R., et al. (2007). Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and social-cultural perspectives? Educational Research Review, 2, 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. (2005). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112(4), 744–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balieiro, M. C., Santos, M. A. D., Santos, J. E. D., & Dressler, W. W. (2011). Does preceived stress mediate the effect of cultural consonance on depression? Transcultural Psychiatry, 48(5), 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, S. P. (1994). Strategies for cultural change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Lanham: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. C., & Dressler, W. W. (2008). A mixed methods investigation of human service providers’ models of domestic violence. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 362–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P. (1994). How schools improve: An international report. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P. (1998). School development; Theories and strategies. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London: Cassell Educational Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Changes forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C., & Hall, J. N. (2010). Dialectices and pragmatism; Being of consequence. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 119–143). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. M., & Fitzgerald, T. (2013). New public management and the modernisation of education systems. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(3), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (2013). Drawing a veil over managerialism: Leadership and the discursive disguise of the new public management. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real educational change and development. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., Jantzi, D., & Mascall, B. (2002). A framework for research on large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. A. Leithwood, J. D. Chapman, P. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 785–840). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Frost, P. J., & Pondy, L. R. (1983). Organizational symbolism. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 3–35). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onderwijsvernieuwingen, C. P. O. (2008). Parlementair onderzoek onderwijsvernieuwingen. Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal: ‘s-Gravenhage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, N. (2005). New public management, innovation, and the non-profit domain: New forms of organizing and professional identity. In M. Veenswijk (Ed.), Organizing innovation (pp. 15–28). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. K., Weller, S., & Batchelder, W. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1973). Beyond the stable state. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture; A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Brian, J. R., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D., & Hardy, C. (2011). Managing organizational change: Negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science, 22(1), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2008). Headteacher critique and resistance: A challenge for policy, and for leadership/management scholars. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troman, G., & Woods, P. (2001). Primary teachers’ stress. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind. Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenswijk, M. (2005). Cultural change in the public sector: Innovating the frontstage and backstage. In M. Veenswijk (Ed.), Organizing innovation; New approach to cultural change and intervention in public sector organizations (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. J., Amick, H., & Lee, S. D. (2008). Review: Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: A review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Medical Care Research and Review, 65(4), 379–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., & Baer, R. (2002). Measuring within- and between-group agreement: Identifying the proportion of shared and unique beliefs across samples. Field Methods, 14(1), 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sijko J. Wierenga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wierenga, S.J., Kamsteeg, F.H., Simons, P.R.J. et al. Teachers making sense of result-oriented teams: A cognitive anthropological approach to educational change. J Educ Change 16, 53–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9240-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9240-2

Keywords

Navigation