Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge creation as an approach to facilitating evidence informed practice: Examining ways to measure the success of using this method with early years practitioners in Camden (London)

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper has three key aims. First it examines the authors’ attempts to use knowledge creation activity as a way of developing evidence informed practice amongst a learning community of 36 early years practitioners in the London Borough of Camden. Second, it seeks to illustrate how the authors approached the idea of measuring evidence use and our engagement with two separate measurement scales: the ‘ladder of research use’ and Hall and Hord’s (Implementing change: patterns, principles and potholes, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2001) levels of use scale. Finally we examine the ‘trustworthiness’ of our approaches to measuring evidence use, which we explored via in-depth semi-structured interviews and the analysis of meeting notes. Our findings would appear to be encouraging, suggesting that knowledge creation activity provides an effective way of communicating research and keeping it top of mind; also that our data would appear to support the trustworthiness of our measurement scales as a means to ascertain levels of evidence use. At the same time the approach we have developed does have its limitations: namely, that it is only really applicable to situations where researchers are working regularly with practitioners on areas of practice development, where the general desire is that these areas should become evidence-informed. We suggest, however, that in school systems such as England’s, where the expectation is that schools or alliances of schools should lead their professional development activity, often in partnership with universities, it is likely that these instances will soon be increasing in number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See: http://www.education.gov.uk/childrenandyoungpeople/families/b00203759/evidence-based-practice, accessed on 10 January, 2014.

  2. These levels are (1) novice; (2) advanced beginner; (3) competent performer; (4) proficient performer and (5) expert.

  3. See: https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/improving-the-quality-and-range-of-education-and-childcare-from-birth-to-5-years/supporting-pages/early-years-foundation-stage. Accessed on 17 February, 2014.

  4. Lesson study has been described as a process involving groups of practitioners collaboratively planning, teaching, observing and analyzing learning and teaching in research lessons. See: http://lessonstudy.co.uk/ for further detail.

  5. That this scale might help the lead author operationalise measures of expertise was highlighted by Professor Louise Stoll who was aware of the lead author’s interest in this area. Similarly, Landry et al. (2003) have also pointed to the Hall and Hord levels of use scale as an acknowledged approach used to examine knowledge ‘utilisation’.

  6. Further detail on how the scales were developed and tested can be found in Loucks et al. (1975).

  7. The Reggio Emilia Approach is an educational philosophy focused on preschool education in one small region of Northern Italy. Its principles are documented in Edwards et al. (2012).

References

  • Anning, A. (2006). Early years education: Mixed messages and conflicts. In D. Kassem, E. Muti, & J. Robinson (Eds.). Education studies: Issues and critical perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2013). Making evidence matter: A new perspective on evidence-informed policy making in education. London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2014). Evidence informed policy and practice in education. A sociological grounding. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (2013). Knowing what we are talking about: Why evidence doesn’t always travel. Evidence & Policy, 9(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, A., Povery, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (2011). Early Years Foundation Stage: Report on the evidence (Tickell Review). London: Department for Education.

  • Department for Education (2012). Early Years Foundation Stage Framework 2012. http://www.foundationyears.org.uk/early-years-foundation-stage-2012/. Accessed on 8 Jul 2012.

  • Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2008). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P., & Porritt, V. (2013). Evaluating the impact of professional development: the need for a student-focused approach. Professional Development in Education,. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.798741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (2012). The hundred languages of children: Reggio Emilia in transformation (3rd ed.). California: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/building-evidence-into-education. Accessed on 27 Jan 2014.

  • Greany, T. (2014) Are we nearly there yet? Progress, issues and next steps for a self-improving system, inaugural professorial lecture to the Institute of Education, 18 March 2014.

  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1996) The Teaching Training Agency Annual Lecture 1996: Teaching as a research based profession: possibilities and prospects. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/TTA%20Hargreaves%20lecture.pdf. Accessed on 14 Jan 2013.

  • Hargreaves, D. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillage, L., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. London: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), 537–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2003). The extent and determinants of utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of education, 1(1), 2–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, S. F., Newlove, B. W., & Hall, G. E. (1975). Measuring levels of use of the innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers and raters. Austin: The University of Texas. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2005). ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: Where’s the quality in systematic review? Journal of Educational Policy, 20(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, G. (2013). Research, policy and knowledge flows in education: What counts in knowledge mobilisation? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8(3), 237–248.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexvid, D., Blom, B., Evertsson, L., & Forssen, A. (2012). Risk reduction technologies in general practice and social work. Professions and Professionalism, 2(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. (2014). An enabling pedagogy: Meanings and practices. In J. Moyles, J. Payler, & J. Georgeson (Eds.), Early years foundations: Critical issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S., & Brown, C. (2014) Developing early years learning and pedagogy: An evaluation report, unpublished report for Camden Partnership for Excellence in Education.

  • Seashore-Louis, K. (2010). Learning communities in learning schools: Developing the social capacity for change. In C. Day (Ed.). Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development. London: Routledge.

  • Stoll, L. (2008). Leadership and policy learning communities: promoting knowledge animation. In B. Chakroun & P. Sahlberg (Eds.), Policy learning in action: European Training Foundation Yearbook 2008. Torino, Italy: European Training Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (2009) Knowledge Animation in Policy and Practice: Making Connections, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association as part of the symposium Using Knowledge to Change Policy and Practice. www.oise.utoronto.ca/rspe/UserFiles/File/Publications%20Presentations/AERA%2009%20knowledge%20animation%20paper%20Stoll.pdf. Accessed on 23 Jan 2014.

  • Stoll, L. (2012). Stimulating learning conversations. Professional Development Today, 14(4), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational research: A critique. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2008). Students’ experiences of workplace learning in Finnish VET. European Journal of Vocational Training, 44, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., et al. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, C., Rogers, S. Knowledge creation as an approach to facilitating evidence informed practice: Examining ways to measure the success of using this method with early years practitioners in Camden (London). J Educ Change 16, 79–99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9238-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9238-9

Keywords

Navigation