Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incorporating creativity into teachers practice and self-concept of professional identity

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study explores what happens to teachers practice and professional identity when they adopt a collaborative action research approach to teaching and involve external creative partners and a university mentor. The teachers aim to nurture and develop the creative potential of their learners through empowering them to make decisions for themselves about their own progress and learning directions. The teachers worked creatively and collaboratively designing creative teaching and learning methods in support of pupils with language and communication difficulties. The respondents are from an English special school, primary school and girls secondary school. A mixed methods methodology is adopted. Gains in teacher confidence and capability were identified in addition to shifts in values that impacted directly on their self-concept of what it is to be an effective teacher promoting effective learning. The development of their professional identities within a team ethos included them being able to make decisions about learning that are based on the educational potential of learners that they proved resulted in elevated standards achieved by this group of learners. They were able to justify their actions on established educational principles. Tensions however were revealed between what they perceived as their normal required professionalism imposed by external agencies and the enhanced professionalism experienced working through the project where they were able to integrate theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubusson, P., Steele, F., Dinham, S., & Brady, L. (2008). Action learning in teacher learning community formation: informative or transformative? Teacher Development, 11(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Doppelt, Y. (1998). Promoting creative thinking within technology education. Washington, DC: Paper Presented at the International Workshop Seminar for Scholars in Technology Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2008). Governmental professionalism: Re-professionalising or de-professionalising teachers in England. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, M., & Hazlewood, P. (2008). Leading the leaders for the future. UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, T. (2008). Putting professional development centre stage. Oxford Review of Education, 34(3), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CapeUK (2005) CARABuilding creative futures. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from CapeUK website: http://www.capeuk.org/capeuk-resources/building-creative-futures.html.

  • CapeUK. (2006). CARA2; the handbook. England: Arts Council.

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, USA and Canada: Routledge.

  • Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongst the five traditions. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. (2002). Creativity: its contribution to design and technology education. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. Reading: University of Reading.

  • Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking Hats. England: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity. London: Harper Collins Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (2010) The ‘six thinking hats’ for schools. Retrieved December 6, 2010, from DeBono website: http://www.edwdebono.com/shcd1.htm.

  • Department for Education and Employment. (1999). All our futures: Creativity culture and education. Suffolk: DFEE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M. C. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2008). The relationship between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D., Csikztenmihayli, M., & Gardner, H. (1995). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. USA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowe, I. (2005). Professional trust. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, M. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher’s professional lives (New Prospect Series).. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995). The empty raincoat. Reading: Arrow Books Ltd.

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. California: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. In V. Houghton, et al. (Eds.), Management in education: The management of organisations and individuals. London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (Ed.). (1981). Managerial processes in schools. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E., & John, P. D. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationship. Journal of Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBoeuf, M. (1994). Creative thinking. London: Judy Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education. England: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M., & Fasciato, M. (2005). Can creativity be assessed? Conference paper, British Educational Research Association conference September 14–17, 2005; University of Glamorgan. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from BERA website: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/150029.htm.

  • Royal Society of Arts. (2010). Opening minds. Retrieved December 6, 2010 from RSA website: http://www.thersa.org/projects/opening-minds.

  • Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The creative age: Knowledge and skills for the new economy. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoulksmith, G. (1970). Intelligence, creativity and cognitive style. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2007) Teacher development against the policy reform grain: An argument for recapturing relationships in teaching and learning. Teacher development, 11(2), 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Indiana: Bensenville.

  • UNICEF. (2007). Report card 7, child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Retrieved November 11, 2010, from UNICEF website: http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/494.

  • Woods, P. (2002). In C. Sugrue & C. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives. London: Routledge Falmer.

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (revised edition). Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 5. CA: Sage Publications.

Download references

Acknowledgments

CapeUK who provided funding for the research and the project ‘Creativity and Action Research Awards Two’ (CARA2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, T. Incorporating creativity into teachers practice and self-concept of professional identity. J Educ Change 14, 51–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9192-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9192-3

Keywords

Navigation