Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding students’ experience of transition from lecture mode to case-based teaching in a management school in India

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to understand experience of students about transition from lecture mode to case study pedagogy in business management courses. Indian education system is predominantly a follower of the lecture mode of teaching from the grass-root level till graduation. Hence Indian students are relatively less familiar with the case based teaching method. In recent times, the case pedagogy has been rapidly replacing the lecture mode in higher education institutes of India, especially at the business management colleges. We conducted a grounded theory based interview of 33 post graduate students enrolled in a business school (B School) in India, which incorporated a pedagogy shift from lecture to case method during academic session 2010–2011. We found that some of the major factors which facilitated the transition process of the students to this new style of learning were previous educational background, prior work experience, course evaluation methods, institute policies and proper orientation through preparatory sessions. Our findings substantiated extant studies conducted in the context of western countries. The findings also provide a systematic analysis of the various issues in incorporating such pedagogic shifts, which may help academicians to successfully troubleshoot any problems associated with commencement of case based teaching in the Indian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antill, L. (2007). Towards active case based learning in IS. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1, 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1980). Some limitations of the case method: Experiences in a management development program. Academy of Management Review, 5, 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. R. (2004). From brand image research to teaching assessment: Using a projective technique borrowed from marketing research to aid an understanding of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education, 12, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. R. (2007). Projective techniques in Taiwan and Asia-Pacific market research. Qualitative Market Research, 10, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, W. L. (1999). A case method for teaching statistics. Journal of Economic Education, 30, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., & Borge, M. (2007). Articulating case-based learning outcomes and assessment. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., Kwan-Ling, N., Karen, K. L. M., Bosco, Y., & Lai-kuen, C. (2005). Students’ view on the use of case method in China. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 32, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju, R., & Gopinath, C. (2001). Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case methods. Journal of Management Education, 25, 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, M. R., Manikutty, S., Rao, S. S., Monippally, M. M., Bijapurkar, R., Raghuram, G., et al. (2005). What is the future of the case method in management education in India? Vikalpa, 30, 87–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, J. J., Jr. (1992). Case method teaching: Suggestions for practice. Marketing Education Review, 2, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. F. (Eds.) (1978). Being there vicariously by case studies. In On college teaching. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass: Ohmer Milton.

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8, 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2000). Grounded theory methodology and consumer behavior, procedures, practice and pitfalls. Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harling, K. F., & Akridge, J. (1998). Using the case method of teaching. Agribusiness, 14, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, J. M. (2004). Teaching is not telling: The case method as a form of interactive learning. Journal of Advanced Marketing Issues, 5, 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., Snyder-Dutch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of inter-coder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R. J. (2002). Case based structured conflict—a means for enhancing classroom learning. Journal of Management Education, 26, 732–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pointer, L. G., & Ljungdahl, P. W. (1973, July). The merit of using the case method in teaching the specialized accounting course, The Accounting Review, 614–618.

  • Rodon, J., & Pastor, J. A. (2007). Applying grounded theory to study the implementation of an inter-organizational information system. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 5, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pratyush Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, S., Banerjee, P. Understanding students’ experience of transition from lecture mode to case-based teaching in a management school in India. J Educ Change 13, 487–509 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9191-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9191-4

Keywords

Navigation