Rethinking school funding, resources, incentives, and outcomes
How does money matter to schooling? Rethinking school funding, resources, and outcomes
W. Norton Grubb
W. Norton Grubb is the David Gardner Chair in Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley, and the faculty coordinator of the Principal Leadership Institute. One of his recent books is The Money Myth: School Resources, Outcomes, and Equity (Russell Sage Foundation, 2009) from which this article is drawn.
The relationship between money and schooling is puzzling. On the one hand, everyone wants more money, particularly when they set out to reform schools. On the other hand, the relationship between spending and outcomes is weak, both in general and in specific cases where governments have increased spending for school improvement but failed to get much. We need a new approach in place of the fixation on revenues and expenditures in conventional school finance.
My approach starts with the obvious point that money does not educate children. Teachers with particular instructiona ...
- Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–136. CrossRef
- Audit Commission (2009). Valuable lessons: Improving economy and efficiency in schools. Briefing for head teachers and school staff with financial responsibilities. Retrieved from http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/AuditCommissionReports/NationalStudies/valauablelessonsteachersguide30June2009.pdf.
- Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2010). The impact of support staff on pupils’ ‘positive approaches to learning’ and their academic progress. British Educational Research Journal, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01411921003734645.
- Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13.
- Dodd, A. (2006). Investigating the effective use of resources in secondary schools (Report No. RR799). Retrieved from DfES website: http://www.education.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR799.pdf.
- Dolton, P., & Van der Klaauw, W. (1999). The turnover of UK teachers: A competing risks explanation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 543–552. CrossRef
- Gawande, A. (2009, December 14). Testing, testing: The health-care bill has no master plan for curbing costs. Is that a bad thing? The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com.
- Grubb, W. N. (2010). Moving research into practice: Creating an educational extension service. Unpublished manuscript.
- Grubb, W. N., & Tredway, L. (2010). Leading from the inside out: Expanded roles for teachers in equitable schools. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
- Marshall, R. (2010). The case for collaborative school reform: The Toledo experience. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
- Newmann, F. M., Smith, B. A., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321. CrossRef
- Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. CrossRef
- Wild, R., Munro, F., & Ayoubkhani, D. (2009). Public service output, input and productivity: Education. Retrieved from Office for National Statistics website: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/education-productivity.pdf.
- Rethinking school funding, resources, incentives, and outcomes
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of Educational Change
Volume 12, Issue 1 , pp 121-130
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. David Gardner Chair in Higher Education, Principal Leadership Institute, Policy, Organization, Measurement, and Evaluation (POME), School of Education, Tolman 3521, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1670, USA
- 2. Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK