Abstract
Intervention effects, triggered by the presence of an intervener c-commanding a Wh-phrase, are known to be weaker in why questions in Japanese and Korean. The existing analyses of this surprising phenomenon focus on the comparison between why questions and other Wh-questions but have not paid attention to the fact that the sentence is still judged more acceptable when an intervener does not c-command why. This paper presents a novel account that appeals to a peculiar presuppositional property of why questions and their impact on the information structure of Wh-questions. Unlike the previous analyses, the proposal can correctly derive graded acceptability of why questions in intervention contexts. It is also shown that the re-emergence of intervention effects with embedded why questions also has its root in the presupposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck Sigrid (1996) Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1–56
Beck Sigrid (2006) Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56
Beck Sigrid, Shin-Sook Kim (1997) On Wh- and operator-scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 339–384
Chomsky Noam (1986) The barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Cinque Guglielmo (1999) Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Deguchi, Masanori, and Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In The Proceedings of NELS 32, ed. M. Hirotani. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Fox Danny (2000) Economy and semantic interpretation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Doctoral diss., University of Amsterdam.
Hagstrom Paul (1998) Decomposing questions. Doctoral diss., MIT
Hamblin C.L. (1973) Questions in montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53
Han Chung-hye, Maribel Romero (2004) On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658
Hara Yurie (2006) Japanese discourse items at interface. University of Delaware, Doctoral diss.
Heycock, Caroline. Focus projection in Japanese. In Proceedings NELS 24, ed. M. Gonzalez, 157–171. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Hirotani, Masako. 2004. Prosody and LF: Processing Japanese Wh-questions. Doctoral diss., University of Massachusetts.
Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Doctoral diss., University of Washington.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but audible wh-scope marking: Wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. In The Proceedings of WCCFL 21, ed. L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts, 180–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ishihara Shinichiro (2003) Intonation and interface conditions. MIT, Doctoral diss
Karttunen Lauri. (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44
Kim, Shin-sook. 2005. Focus intervention effects in questions. Manuscript presented at Theoretical East Asian Languages 3, Harvard University.
Kim Soowon. (1991) Chain scope and quantification structure. Brandeis University, Doctoral diss
Ko Hee-jeong (2005) Syntax of wh-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 867–916
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Focus, quantification, and dynamic interpretation: The case of focus sensitive particles. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Logic and Language, ed. K. Bimbó and A. Máté, 31–60. Budapest: Aron Publishers.
Krifka, Manfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae, ed. C. Fery and W. Sternefeld, 287–319. Berlin: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Akademie Verlag (= Studia Grammatica 52).
Kuno Susumu (1973) The structure of the Japanese language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kuroda Shige-Yuki (1965) Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Doctoral diss., MIT
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 1998. Overt wh-movement and scope fixing scrambling: A preliminary study. In Report (2) researching and verifying an advanced theory of human language, ed. Kazuko Inoue, 115–127. Chiba: Kanda University of International Studies.
Lawler, J. 1971. Any questions? In Papers from the 7th regional meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 7).
Lee, Mina. 2002. Why is ‘why’ different? Manuscript presented at Chicago Linguistics Society, 38.
Linebarger Marcia (1987) Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–387
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. On the nature of wh-scope. Manuscript, MIT
Miyagawa, Shigeru, and Yoshio Endo. 2004. Intervention effects are not pragmatic. Manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Yokohama National University.
Nagahara Hiroyuki (1994) Phonological phrasing in Japanese. University of California–Los Angeles, Doctoral diss.
Pierrehumbert Janet, Mary Beckman (1988) Japanese tone structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Rooth Mats (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116
Tanaka Hidekazu (1997) Invisible movement of sika-nai and the linear crossing constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 143–188
Tancredi Chris (1992) Deletion, deaccenting, and presupposition. MIT, Doctoral diss.
Tomioka Satoshi (2007a) The Japanese existential possession: A case study of pragmatic disambiguation. Lingua 117: 881–902
Tomioka Satoshi (2007b) Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Wh-interrogatives in Japanese and Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1570–1590
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomioka, S. Why questions, presuppositions, and intervention effects. J East Asian Linguist 18, 253–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9053-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9053-0