Abstract
Sexual assault has been recognized as a major public health problem and social concern among college students for several decades. In response to the inadequacies of many universities to effectively address this problem, researchers, policy makers, and the public alike have recently called for greater attention to reducing the high rates of sexual violence against college women. The present study expands on the current literature by investigating familial, individual, and sociocultural risk factors for sexual assault. Specifically, we examine insecure adult attachment styles and the hook-up culture on college campuses as mediators in the relationship between family of origin aggression and sexual assault perpetration by men and victimization among women. Research questions were addressed with a sample of 624 college undergraduates (54 % women). Consistent with hypotheses, results of structural equation modeling indicated that an avoidant attachment style and participation in the hook-up culture accounted for the relationship between exposure to interparental hostility and sexual assault perpetration by men and victimization among women. Further, among women, an anxious attachment style accounted for the relationship between harsh parenting and victimization. These findings have important implications for future research, relationship education programs for parents and young adults, and preventative interventions. For example, parents can learn about the risks of exposing their offspring to hostility and aggression while adolescents and young adults may benefit from relationship education programs that help establish healthy working models of relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, A. (2002). Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, 118–128.
Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A. M., & Buck, P. O. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 784–807.
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004). College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 91–122.
Adler-Baeder, F., Calligas, A., Skuban, E., Keiley, M., Ketring, S., & Smith, T. (2013). Linking changes in couple functioning and parenting among couple relationship education participants. Family Relations, 62, 284–297.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–499.
Babor, T. F., Higgin-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for primary care (2nd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Barriger, M., & Vélez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 84–94.
Basile, K. C., & Saltzman, L. E. (2002). Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv_surveillance_definitionsl-2009-a.pdf.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A., & Saville, B. (2010). To Hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669.
Brassard, A., Shaver, P. R., & Lussier, Y. (2007). Attachment, sexual experience, and sexual pressure in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 14, 475–493.
Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., McNair, L., Chen, Y. F., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Wills, T. A. (2005). Linking changes in parenting to parent-child relationship quality and youth self-control: The Strong African American Families Program. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 47–69.
Brown, A. L., Testa, M., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2009). Psychological consequences of sexual victimization resulting from force, incapacitation, and verbal coercion. Violence Against Women, 15, 898–919.
Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P., & Roth, M. (1993). Transforming a rape culture. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
Burnett, A., Mattern, J. L., Herakova, L. L., Kahl, D. H., Tobola, C., & Bornsen, S. E. (2009). Communicating/muting date rape a co-cultural theoretical analysis of communication factors related to rape culture on a college campus. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 465–485.
Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and influences on adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526–541.
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076–1090.
Erdely, S. R. (2014). A rape on campus: A brutal assault and struggle for justice at UVA. Rolling Stone, 1223. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/a-rape-on-campus-20141119.
Felson, R. B. (1993). Motives for sexual coercion. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives (pp. 233–253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Report No. NCJ 182369). Retrieved from Bureau of Justice Statistics: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf.
Flack, W. F., Jr, Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigilotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Linder, F., Benefield, T., & Suchindran, C. (2004). Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates Program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 619–624.
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.
Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265.
Gross, A. M., Winslett, A., Roberts, M., & Gohm, C. L. (2006). An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women, 12, 288–300.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
Hines, D. A., Armstrong, J. L., Reed, K. P., & Cameron, A. Y. (2012). Gender differences in sexual assault victimization among college students. Violence and Victims, 27, 922–940.
Jones-Sanpei, H. A., Day, R. D., & Holmes, E. K. (2009). Core family process measures in the NLSY97: Variation by gender, race, income, and family structure. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 149–167.
Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2013). Casual hook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective association with attitudes about sex and love relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1451–1462.
Kernsmith, P. D., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). Gender differences in responses to sexual coercion. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 902–914.
Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved fromWashington, DC. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.
Mikulincer, M. P., Shaver, R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77–102.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. 6 Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nason, E. E., & Yeater, E. A. (2012). Sexual attitudes mediate the relationship between sexual victimization history and women’s response effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2565–2581.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ, 2010). Rape and sexual violence. Retrieved from http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/rape-sexual-violence/Pages/welcome.aspx.
Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
Paxton, R. J., Valois, R. F., & Drane, J. W. (2007). Is there a relationship between family structure and substance use among public middle school students? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 593–605.
Sakaguchi, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). Personality correlates with frequency of being targeted for unexpected advances by strangers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 948–968.
Schramm, D. G., & Gomez-Scott, J. (2012). Merging relationship education and child abuse prevention knowledge: An evaluation of effectiveness with adolescents. Marriage & Family Review, 48(8), 792–808.
Siegel, J. A., & Williams, L. M. (2009). Risk factors for sexual victimization of women: Results from a prospective study. Violence Against Women, 9, 902–930.
Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., & Simons, R. L. (2008). A test of explanations for the effect of harsh parenting on the perpetration of dating violence and sexual coercion among college males. Violence and Victims, 23, 66–82.
Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., & Tambling, R. B. (2012a). Identifying mediators of the influence of family factors on risky sexual behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 460–470.
Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Lei, M. K., Hancock, D. L., & Fincham, F. D. (2012b). Parental warmth amplifies the negative effect of parental hostility on dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2603–2626.
Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Lei, M. K., & Sutton, T. E. (2012c). Exposure to harsh parenting and pornography as explanations for male’s sexual coercion and female’s sexual victimization. Violence and Victims, 27, 378–395.
Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (2001). Further evidence for a relationship between attachment insecurity and coercive sexual behavior in nonoffenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 22–35.
Straus, M. A., Douglas, E. M., & Medeiros, R. A. (2014). Primordial violence: Spanking children, psychological development, violence, and crime. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sutton, T. E., Simons, L. G., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Futris, T. G. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of violence: Examining the mediating roles of insecure attachment and destructive disagreement beliefs. Violence & Victims, 29(4), 670–687.
Tyler, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13, 47–61.
Ullman, S. E., Karabatsos, G., & Koss, M. P. (1999). Alcohol and sexual assault in a national sample of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 603–625.
Ven, T. V., & Beck, J. (2009). Getting drunk and hooking up: An exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 626–648.
Vrangalova, Z., & Ong, A. D. (2014). Who benefits from casual sex? The moderating role of sociosexuality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550614537308.
Wade, L., Sweeney, B., Derr, A. S., Messner, M. A., & Burke, C. (2014). Ruling out rape. Contexts, 13, 16–25.
Walker, D. F., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 98–108.
Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Sibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health college alcohol study surveys, 1993–2001. Journal of American College Health, 50, 203–217.
Wentland, J. J., Herold, E. S., Desmarais, S., & Mihausen, R. R. (2009). Differentiating highly sexual women from less sexual women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18, 169–182.
White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. (2014). Not alone: The first report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/report_0.pdf.
Center Against Rape & Domestic Violence (CARDV, n.d.). About sexual assault. Retrieved 11/14/14 from http://cardv.org/aboutsexualassault.php.
Yost, M. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 163–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutton, T.E., Simons, L.G. Sexual Assault Among College Students: Family of Origin Hostility, Attachment, and the Hook-Up Culture as Risk Factors. J Child Fam Stud 24, 2827–2840 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0087-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0087-1