Abstract
This paper presents results from the transitioning youth to families intervention, which aimed to promote family care for youth served in group care programs in the child welfare system. The intervention was conducted in two counties in a Mid-Atlantic state. The effort encompassed administrative case review and family involvement meetings. We assessed the effect of the intervention in promoting placement in family settings within 12 months. We also explored other effects of the intervention identified by participants. Using propensity score matching with administrative data to compare one-year placement settings for the intervention counties and non-intervention counties, a higher rate of family reunification was identified for youth in the treatment counties. To provide a richer contextual understanding of the effects of the intervention, thematic analysis of open-ended comments from youth and caregiver participants was conducted. These resulting themes provided further understanding of the value of the intervention especially in the areas of planning for the transition, improving youth insight about placement options, and the importance of family involvement. Participants also made recommendations for how to enhance the intervention and promote the transition of youth from group care to family settings. Overall, the effect of the intervention in transitioning youth to family settings was nominal; however unanticipated benefits of engaging youth and family in the transition process were noted. From this evaluation, we provide suggestions for future research and the development of effort to transition youth from group care settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akin, B. A. (2011). Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship and adoption. Children & Youth Services Review, 33, 999–1011.
Baker, A. J. L., & Calderon, P. (2004). The role of group care homes in the child welfare continuum of care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 21(4), 39–58.
Barth, R. P. (2005). Foster home care is more cost-effective than shelter care: Serious questions continue to be raised about the utility of group care in child welfare services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 623–625.
Barth, R. P., Greeson, J. P., Guo, S., Green, R. L., Hurley, S., & Sisson, J. (2007). Outcome for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: A comparing using propensity scores. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(4), 498–505.
Barth, R. P., Guo, S., & McCrae, J. S. (2008). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating the success of child and family service program. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 212–222.
Barth, R. P., Wildfire, J., & Green, R. L. (2006). Placement into foster care and the interplay of urbanicity, child behavior problems and poverty. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 358–366.
Becker, M. A., Jordan, N., & Larsen, R. (2007). Predictors of successful permanency planning and length of stay in foster care: The role of race, diagnosis and place of residence. Children & Youth Services Review, 29, 1102–1113.
Belanger, K., & Stone, W. (2008). The social service divide: Service availability and accessibility in rural versus urban counties and impact on child welfare outcomes. Child Welfare, 87, 101–124.
Budde, S., Mayer, S., Zinn, A., Lippold, M., Avrushin, A., Bromberg, A., et al. (2004). Residential care in Illinois: Trends and alternatives. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children.
Burns, B. J., & Friedman, R. M. (1990). Examining the research base for child mental health services and policy. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 17, 87–98.
Connell, C. M., Katz, K. H., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2006). Leaving foster care—The influence of child and case characteristics on foster care exit rates. Children & Youth Services Review, 28, 780–798.
Courtney, M. E. (1994). Factors associated with the reunification of foster children and their families. Social Service Review, 68, 81–108.
Curtis, P. A., Alexander, G., & Lunghofer, L. A. (2001). A literature review comparing the outcomes of residential group care and therapeutic foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 18(5), 377–392.
D’Agostino, R. B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265–2281.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.
Farmer, E. Z., Wagner, H. R., Burns, B. J., & Richards, J. T. (2003). Treatment foster care in a system of care: Sequences and correlates of residential placements. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(1), 11–25.
Freundlich, M., & Avery, R. J. (2005). Planning for permanency for youth in congregate care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(2), 115–134.
Guo, S., Barth, R. P., & Gibbons, C. (2006). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating substance abuse services for child welfare clients. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 357–383.
Hair, H. J. (2005). Outcomes for children and adolescents after residential treatment: A review of research from 1993 to 2003. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 551–575.
Harris, M. S., & Courtney, M. E. (2003). The interaction of race, ethnicity, and family structure with respect to the timing of family reunification. Children & Youth Services Review, 25, 409–429.
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.
Hyde, J., & Kammerer, N. (2009). Adolescents’ perspectives on placement moves and congregate settings: Complex and cumulative instabilities in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 265–273.
James, S. (2011). What works in group care?—A structured review of treatment models for group homes and residential care. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 308–321.
James, S., Leslie, L. K., Hurlburt, M. S., Slymen, D. J., Landsverk, J., Davis, I., et al. (2006). Children in out-of-home care: Entry into intensive or restrictive mental health and residential care placements. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 196–208.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Landsman, M. J., Groza, V., Tyler, M., & Malone, K. (2001). Outcomes of family-centered residential treatment. Child Welfare, 80, 351–379.
Lee, B. R., Bright, C. L., Svoboda, D., Fakunmoju, S., & Barth, R. P. (2011). Outcomes of group care for youth: A review of comparative studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 177–189.
Lee, B. R., Shaw, T. V., Gove, B., & Hwang, J. (2010). Transitioning from group care to family care: Child welfare worker assessments. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1770–1777.
Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). Psmatch2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html, version 3.0.0.
Lyons, J. S., Libman-Mintzer, L. N., Kisiel, C. L., & Shallcross, H. (1998). Understanding the mental health needs of children and adolescents in residential treatment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(6), 582–587.
Massinga, R., & Pecora, P. J. (2004). Providing better opportunities for older children in the child welfare system. The Future of Children, 14, 151–175.
Munson, M. R., & Scott, L. D. (2008). Older youth nearing their exit from congregate care: Current innovative programs. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 24(1), 77–91.
Nickerson, A. B., Colby, S. A., Brooks, J. L., Rickert, J. M., & Salamone, F. J. (2007). Transitioning youth from residential treatment to the community: A preliminary investigation. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36, 73–86.
Preyde, M., Cameron, G., Frensch, K., & Adams, G. (2011). Parent-child relationships and family functioning of children and youth discharged from residential mental health treatment or a home-based alternative. Residential Treatment For Children & Youth, 28(1), 55–74.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33–38.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rubin, D. B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 757–763.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The AFCARS (adoption and foster care analysis and reporting system) report. Washington DC: Author. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report18.pdf.
Wells, K., & Guo, S. (1999). Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children & Youth Services Review, 21, 273–294.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge funding for this project from the Annie E. Casey Foundation and the University of Maryland School of Social Work. Points of view and the opinions presented in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions or policies of the funders. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 24th Annual Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference in Tampa, FL (2011) and Quality in Alternative Care conference in Prague, Czech Republic (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, B.R., Hwang, J., Socha, K. et al. Going Home Again: Transitioning Youth to Families After Group Care Placement. J Child Fam Stud 22, 447–459 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9596-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9596-y