Date: 15 Nov 2006
Measuring Subjective Social Status: A Case Study of Older Taiwanese
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Despite widespread use of measures of social status and increasing interest in the relationship between social status and health, the variables used to denote social status are often inappropriate for use with older populations. This article examines responses to a recently developed measure of subjective social position, known as the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. The instrument asks respondents to use ten rungs of a ladder to position themselves socioeconomically relative to other people in their country and, separately, in their community. These questions were incorporated into a recent national survey of middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan. The objectives of the analysis were to gain a better understanding of how such subjective assessments are formed (i.e., to explore the contribution of social, economic, and cultural factors in the determination of position within a social hierarchy) and to assess the potential utility of the ladder instrument in social science and health research. This article compares results from Taiwan with those derived from subjective measures of social status in Western populations. The findings support use of the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status as a measure of subjective social status among the older population and suggest that using it may provide further insights into the social gradient in health.
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physical health: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 585–591.CrossRef
Adler, N. E., & Ostrove, J. M. (1999). Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don’t. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896, 3–15.CrossRef
Baker, H. D. R. (1979). Chinese family and kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
Baxter, J. (1994). Is husband’s class enough? Class location and class identity in the United States, Sweden, Norway, and Australia. American Sociological Review, 59, 200–235.CrossRef
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Centers, R. (1949). The psychology of social classes: A study of class consciousness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chao, P. (1983). Chinese kinship. London: Kegan Paul International.
Chu, J. J. (1996). Taiwan: A fragmented ‘middle’ class in the making. In R. Robison & D. S. G. Goodman (Eds.), The new rich in Asia (pp. 205–2220). London: Routledge.
Copper, J. F. (2003). Taiwan: Nation-state or province? (4th ed.) Boulder, CO: Westview.
Cornman, J. C., Goldman, N., Weinstein, W., & Chang, M.-C. (2003). Social ties and perceived support: Two dimensions of social relationships and health among the elderly in Taiwan. Journal of Aging and Health, 15, 616–644.CrossRef
Crittenden, K. S. (1991). Asian self-effacement or feminine modesty? Attributional patterns of women university students in Taiwan. Gender and Society, 5, 98–117.CrossRef
Davis, N. J. & Robinson, R. V. (1988). Class identification of men and women in the 1970s and 1980s. American Sociological Review, 53, 103–112.CrossRef
Diamond, N. (1973). The status of women in Taiwan: One step forward, and two steps back. In M. B. Young (Ed.), Women in China: Studies in social change and feminism (pp. 211–242). Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan.
Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In A. J. Reiss (Ed.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109–138). New York: Free.
Ekehammar, B., Sidanius, J., & Nilsson, I. (1987). Social status: Construct and external validity. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 473–481.CrossRef
Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Kolosi, T. (1992). Images of class: Public perceptions in Hungary and Australia. American Sociological Review, 57, 461–482.CrossRef
Featherman, D. L., & Stevens, G. (1982). A revised socio-economic index of occupational status: Application in analysis of sex differences in attainment. In R. M. Hauser, D. Mechanic, A. O. Haller, & T. S. Hauser (Eds.), Social structure and behavior (pp. 141–181). Boston: Academic.
Fricke, T. E., Chang, J. S., & Yang, L. S. (1994). Historical and ethnographic perspectives on the Chinese family. In A. Thornton & H. S. Lin (Eds.), Social change and the family in Taiwan (pp. 22–48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gates, H. (1981). Ethnicity and social class. In E. M. Ahern & H. Gates (Eds.), The anthropology of Taiwanese society (pp. 241–281). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goldman, N. (2001). Social inequalities in health: Disentangling the underlying mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 954, 118–139.CrossRef
Goldman, N., Glei, D., & Chang, M. C. (2003). The role of clinical risk factors in understanding self-rated health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 148–154.CrossRef
Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108, E31.CrossRef
Goyder, J. C. (1975). A note on the declining relation between subjective and objective class measures. British Journal of Sociology, 26, 102–109.CrossRef
Greenhalgh, S. (1984). Networks and their nodes: Urban society in Taiwan. China Quarterly, 99, 529–552.
Grundy, E., & Holt, G. (2001). The socioeconomic status of older adults: How should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 895–904.CrossRef
Hermalin, A. I., Chang, M. C., & Road, C. (2002). Economic well-being: Insights from multiple measures of income and assets. In A. I. Hermalin (Ed.), The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four-country comparative study (pp. 295–360). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hermalin, A. I., Liu, P. K. C., & Freedman, D. S. (1994). The social and economic transformation of Taiwan. In A. Thornton & H. S. Lin (Eds.), Social change and the family in Taiwan (pp. 49–87). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodge, R. W., & Treiman, D. J. (1968). Class identification in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 535–547.CrossRef
Hu, P., Adler, N., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., & Seeman, T. (2005). Relations between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 483–488.CrossRef
Ikels, C. (1993). Chinese kinship and the state: Shaping of policy for the elderly. In G. L. Maddox & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (pp. 123–146). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1973). An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. American Sociological Review, 38, 569–582.CrossRef
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B., & Wilkinson, R. G. (Eds.) (1999). Income inequality and health, vol. I: The society and population health reader. New York: New.
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (1995). Class and class conflict in six Western nations. American Sociological Review, 60, 157–178.CrossRef
Kikkawa, T. (2000). Changes in the determinants of class identification in Japan. International Journal of Sociology, 30, 34–51.
Kluegel, J. R., Singleton, R., & Starnes, C. E. (1977). Subjective class identification: A multiple indicator approach. American Sociological Review, 42, 599–611.CrossRef
Kourvetaris, G. A., & Dobratz, B. A. (1984). Objective and subjective class identification among Athenians in Greece. Social Science Research, 66, 484–500.
Lamley, H. (1981). Subethnic rivalry in the Ch’ing period. In E. M. Ahern & H. Gates (Eds.), The anthropology of Taiwanese society (pp. 282–318). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lee, Y. T., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1997). Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 32–40.CrossRef
Liberatos, P., Link, B. G., & Kelsey, J. L. (1988). The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiological Review, 10, 87–121.
Marsh, R. M. (1996). The great transformation: Social change in Taipei, Taiwan, since the 1960s. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Ministry of Education (2001). Educational statistical indicators, Republic of China. Taipei: Republic of China.
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 769–784.CrossRef
Ostrove, J. M., Adler, N. E., Kuppermann, M., & Washington, A. E. (2000). Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women. Health Psychology, 19, 613–618.CrossRef
Preston, S. H., & Taubman, P. (1994). Socioeconomic differences in adult mortality and health status. In L. G. Martin & S. H. Preston (Eds.), Demography of aging (pp. 279–318). Washington, DC: National Academy.
Simpson, I. H., Stark, D., & Jackson, R. A. (1988). Class identification processes of married, working men and women. American Sociological Review, 53, 284–293.CrossRef
Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1321–1333.CrossRef
StataCorp (2001). Stata statistical software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
Taiwan Provincial Institute of Family Planning; Population Studies Center and Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan (1989). 1989 Survey of health and living status of the elderly in Taiwan: Questionnaire and survey design (Comparative study of the elderly in Asia: Res. Rep. no. 1). Ann Arbor: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
Taiwan Provincial Institute of Family Planning; Population Studies Center and Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan (1997). 1996 Survey of health and living status of the elderly and middle aged in Taiwan (Comparative study of the elderly in four Asian countries, Taiwan aging studies series: Res. Rep. nos. 7-1 & 7-2). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Population Studies Center.
Tsai, S. L. (1992). Social change and status attainment in Taiwan: Comparisons of ethnic groups. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 2, 225–256.
Tsai, S. L., & Chiu, H. Y. (1991). Constructing occupational scales for Taiwan. In R. Althauser & M. Wallace (Eds.), Research in social stratification and mobility: A research annual (pp. 229–253). New York: Jai.
Wang, H. Z. (2001). Ethnicized social mobility in Taiwan: Mobility patterns among owners of small- and medium-scale businesses. Modern China, 27, 328–358.CrossRef
Wang, T. Y., & Liu, I. C. (2004). Contending identities in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 44, 568–590.CrossRef
Weinstein, M., Chang, M. C., Cornman, J., & Stark, M. (2004). Have Taiwanese sisters been subsidizing the education of their brothers? Journal of Population Studies, 29, 3–34.
Yanaihara, T. (1929). Teikoku shugi-ka no Taiwan [Taiwan under imperialism]. Economic Research Center of Taiwan Bank.
- Measuring Subjective Social Status: A Case Study of Older Taiwanese
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
Volume 21, Issue 1-2 , pp 71-89
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Social gradient
- Social status
- Subjective social position
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Office of Population Research, Princeton University, 243 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544-2091, USA
- 2. School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Policy, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 335 George St., Suite 2200, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA
- 3. Center for Population and Health Survey Research, Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Taichung, Taiwan