Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Praise of Vagueness: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Archaeological Methodology

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article stipulates that vagueness is a socially important yet academically largely overlooked aspect of human interaction with the world. Vagueness and vague experiences can structure material categorisations of the world; it can contribute to the shaping of social relations and nurture the appreciation of difficult experiences. However, the recent archaeological (re)turn to science as the main provider of knowledge of the past renders vagueness futile as an empirical occurrence through its exorcism of elusiveness and ambiguity in the notorious pursuit of absolute, exact and quantifiable facts. This article challenges the pursuit and use of exact data in archaeological science and the consequential implications of the omission of vague occurrences, discussing the problem that ambiguous and absent evidence become neglected in subsequent conclusion. Second, it is demonstrated that vagueness and ambiguity can be integral to certain social and material phenomena. Third, the article examines recent archaeological analyses of burial practices in South Scandinavian passage graves from the Middle Neolithic in order to discuss the pursuit of certitude in archaeological observations and interpretations. Finally, it is argued that the idealisation of certitude in archaeological analysis needs to be complemented by an interpretative framework making it possible to recognise vagueness as a social phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlström, T. (2001). Det döda kollektivet. Bioantropologisk analys av skelettmaterialet från Rössbergagånggriften. In P. Persson & K.-G. Sjögren (Eds.), Falbygdens gånggrifter. Undersökningar 1985–1998 (pp. 301–362). Göteborgs: Göteborgs Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlström, T. (2003). Grave or ossuary? Osteological finds from a recently excavated passage tomb in Falbygden, Sweden. In G. Burenhult, & S. Westergaard (Eds.), Stones and Bones: Formal disposal of the dead in Atlantic Europe during the Mesolithic-Neolithic interface 6000–3000 BC. Archaeological Conference in Honour of the Late Professor Michael J. O’Kelly. Proceedings of the Stones and Bones Conference in Sligo, Ireland, May 1–5, 2002 (pp. 253–269, Vol. 1201). Oxford: Archaeopress.

  • Ahlström, T. (2009). Underjordiska dödsriken: Humanosteologiska studier av neolitiska kollektivgravar. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. H. (1997). The sarup enclosures: The funnel beaker culture of the sarup site including two causewayed camps compared to the contemporary settlements in the area and other European enclosures, Sarup. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. H. (2000). Kult og ritualer i den ældre bondestenalder. Kuml, 2000, 13–48.

  • Andersen, N. H. (2004). Sarup: causewayed enclosures placed in a Neolithic ritual landscape on Funen, Denmark. Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science, 14, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. H. (2009). Sarupområdet på Sydvestfyn i slutningen af 4. årtusinde f. Kr. In A. Schülke (Ed.), Plads og rum i tragtbægerkulturen. Bidrag fra Arbejdsmødet på Nationalmuseet, 22. september 2005 (pp. 25–44). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. H. (2010). Causewayed enclosures and megalithic monuments as media for shaping Neolithic identities. http://www.jungsteinsite.de/.

  • Bennett, B. (2001). What is a forest? On the vagueness of certain geographic concepts. Topoi, 20(2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M., Bjerregaard, P., & Sørensen, T. F. (2015). Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 31–38.

  • Blikstad-Balas, M. (2013). Vague concepts in the educational sciences: implications for researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1995). Atmosphäre: Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1998). Anmutungen: Über das Atmosphärische. Ostfildern Von Stuttgart: Edition Tertium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (2006). Architektur und atmosphäre. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, N. (2009). Grasping the elusive and unknowable: material culture in ritual practice. Material Religion, 5(3), 266–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brück, J. (2006). Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in middle and late bronze age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brück, J. (2014). Cremation, gender and concepts of the self in the British bronze age. In I. Kuijt, C. Quinn, & G. Cooney (Eds.), Transformation by fire: The archaeology of cremation in cultural context (pp. 119–139). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2000). An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. J. (1995). On vague objects, fuzzy logic and fractal boundaries. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, K. (2010). Bodies in pieces in the Neolithic Near East. In K. C. Rebay, M. L. S. Sørensen, & J. Hughes (Eds.), Body parts and wholes: Changing relations and meanings (pp. 6–19). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, T., & Hansen, S. I. (2002). Megalithic architecture in scandinavia. In R. Joussaume, L. Laporte, & C. Scarre (Eds.), Origine et développement du mégalithisme de L’ouest de L’Europe. Actes du colloque international, 26–30 Octobre 2002, Bougon, France (pp. 39–61). Bougon: Musée des Tumulus de Bougon (Deus-Sèvres).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, T., & Hansen, S. I. (2007). Examples of megalithic technology and architecture in Denmark. In J. H. F. Bloemers (Ed.), Tussen D26 en P14: Jan Albert Bakker 65 jaar (pp. 17–32). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Archeologische Centrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, T., Hansen, S. I., & Westphal, J. (2004). Jættestuen Birkehøj. Restaurering af en 5.000 år gammel storstensgrav. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, 2004, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2002). The actual and the virtual. In G. Deleuze, & C. Parnet (Eds.), Dialogues II (pp. 148–159). London: Continuum. First published 1977.

  • Edgington, D. (1995). On Conditionals. Mind, 104(414), 235–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics: The growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelke, M. (2007). Clarity and Charisma: on the uses of ambiguity in ritual life. In M. Engelke & M. Tomlinson (Eds.), The limits of meaning: Case studies in the anthropology of christianity (pp. 63–83). Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, P., & Andersen, N. H. (2014). Stendysser. Arkitektur og funktion. Højbjerg: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1978). Can there be vague objects? Analysis, 38, 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlander, F. (2012). Articulating stone. The material practice of petroglyphing. In I.-M. Back Danielsson, F. Fahlander, & Y. Sjöstrand (Eds.), Encountering imagery: Materialities, perceptions, relations (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. (2005). Identity politics: Personhood, kinship, gender and power in neolithic and early bronze age Britain. In E. C. Casella & C. Fowler (Eds.), The archaeology of plural and changing identities: Beyond identification (pp. 109–134). New York: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. (2008). Fractal bodies in the past and present. In D. Borić & J. Robb (Eds.), Past bodies: Body-centered research in archaeology (pp. 47–57). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R., & Toms, J. (1991). Preface. In P. Garwood, D. Jennings, R. Skeates, & J. Toms (Eds.), Sacred and profane: Proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion (pp. v-x). Oxford: Oxford University Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. M. (2007). Honoring ambiguity/problematizing certitude. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, R., & Graupner, S. (Eds.). (2007). Atmosphäre(n): Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff. München: Kopäd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, R., & Graupner, S. (Eds.). (2012). Atmosphäre(n) II: Interdisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen unscharfen Begriff. München: Kopäd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, D. (2000). Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 28(1), 45–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, P. (2009). On vagueness, truth values and fuzzy logics. Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, 91(3), 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, C. (1954). Archeological theory and method: some suggestions from the old world. American Anthropologist, 56(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, K. (2001). How things persist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heibach, C. (Ed.). (2012). Atmosphären: Dimensionen eines diffusen Phänomens. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1992). Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holten, L. (2000). Death, danger, destruction and unintended megaliths: an essay on human classification and its material and social consequences in the neolithic of South Scandinavia. In A. Ritchie (Ed.), Neolithic orkney in its european context (pp. 287–297). Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, D. (2011). The sorites paradox. In G. Ronzitti (Ed.), Vagueness: A guide (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. (1973). The literary work of art: an investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic, and theory of literature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. First published 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwagen, P. V. (1988). How to reason about vague objects. Philosophical Topics, 16(1), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inwagen, P. V. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, W. (1972). The reading process: a phenomenological approach. New Literary History, III(2), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, F. (1992). Ritualer med menneskeknogler i yngre stenalder. Kuml, 1991(92), 7–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. (2015). Towards a new paradigm? The third science revolution and its possible consequences in archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, Å. M. (2003). Secondary burial practices in the middle neolithic: causes and consequences. Current Swedish Archaeology, 11, 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, Å. M. (2009a). Breaking and making bodies and pots: material and ritual practices in Sweden in the third millennium BC. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, Å. M. (2009b). Organized chaos. Defleshing, cremation and dispersal of the dead in pitted ware culture. In I.-M. Back Danielsson, I. Gustin, A. Larsson, N. Myrberg, & S. Thedéen (Eds.), Döda personers sällskap: Gravmaterialens identiteter och kulturella uttryck (pp. 109–130). Stockholm: Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1993). Many, but almost one. In K. Campbell, J. Bacon, & L. Reinhardt (Eds.), Ontology, causality, and mind: Essays on the philosophy of D.M. armstrong (pp. 23–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidén, K., & Eriksson, G. (2013). Archaeology vs. Archaeological science: do we have a case? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, J., Hjärthner-Holdar, E., Grandin, L., Billström, K., & Persson, P.-O. (2012). Moving metals or indigenous mining? Provenancing scandinavian bronze age artefacts by lead isotopes and trace elements. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, J., Stos-Gale, Z., Grandin, L., Billström, K., Hjärthner-Holdar, E., & Persson, P.-O. (2014). Moving metals II: provenancing scandinavian bronze age artefacts by lead isotope and elemental analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41(1), 106–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. (2009). Aalstrup - en boplads og systemgravsanlæg ved Horsens Fjord. In A. Schülke (Ed.), Plads og rum i tragtbægerkulturen. Bidrag fra Arbejdsmødet på Nationalmuseet, 22. september 2005 (pp. 105–138). Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (1987). Realer than the real: the simulacrum according to deleuze and guattari. Copyright, 1, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merricks, T. (2001). Varieties of vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXIII(1), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. S. (1992). TRB culture. The first farmers of the north european plain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, V. (2006). The unmappable: vagueness and spatial experience. Space and Culture, 9(4), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morreau, M. (2002). What vague objects are like. The Journal of Philosophy, XCIX(7), 333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordman, C. A. (1917). Studier över gånggriftkulturen i Danmark. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1917, 269–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, J. M., Davis, N. Z., & Allen, B. (2011). Fuzzy studies: a symposium on the consequence of blur. Part 1. Common Knowledge, 17(3), 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, P., & Sjögren, K.-G. (Eds.). (2001). Falbygdens gånggrifter. Undersökninger 1985–1998. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, C. (2013). Archaeology vs. science: or taking knowledge-based communication seriously? Current Swedish Archaeology, 21, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: the making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, A. (2012). Die besondere atmosphäre: Ästhetische feldforschungen. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1985). The archaeology of cult: the sanctuary at Phylakopi. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. (1929). Nye jættestuefund. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1929, 189–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. (1933). To Jættestuer. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, 1933, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuldt, E. (1972). Die mecklenburgischen Megalithgräber. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Architektur und Funktion. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1982). Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of neolithic mortuary practices. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology (pp. 129–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, K.-G. (2010a). Anonymous ancestors? The tilley/shanks hypothesis revisited. In D. Calado, M. Baldia, & M. Boulanger (Eds.), Monumental questions: Prehistoric megaliths, mounds, and enclosures (pp. 111–118). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, K.-G. (2010b). Megaliths, landscapes and identities: The case of Falbygden, Sweden. http://www.jungsteinsite.de/.

  • Sjögren, K.-G. (2015). Mortuary practices, bodies and persons in Northern Europe. In C. Fowler, J. Harding, & D. Hofmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of neolithic Europe (pp. 1005–1022). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, K.-G., Price, T. D., & Ahlström, T. (2009). Megaliths and mobility in south-western Sweden. Investigating relationships between a local society and its neighbours using strontium isotopes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaarup, J. (1985). Yngre stenalder på øerne syd for Fyn. Rudkøbing: Langelands Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoglund, P., Malmström, H., Raghavan, M., Storå, J., Hall, P., Willerslev, E., et al. (2012). Origins and genetic legacy of neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe. Science, 336(6080), 466–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2009). The presence of the dead: cemeteries, cremation and the staging of non-place. Journal of Social Archaeology, 9(1), 110–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2010). A saturated void: anticipating and preparing presence in contemporary Danish cemetery culture. In M. Bille, F. Hastrup, & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), An anthropology of absence: Materializations of transcendence and loss (pp. 115–130). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2011). Sweet dreams: biographical blanks and the commemoration of children. Mortality, 16(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2012). Delusion and disclosure: human disposal and the aesthetics of vagueness. In M. L. S. Sørensen & K. Rebay-Salisbury (Eds.), Embodied knowledge: Historical perspectives on technology and belief (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2014). Re/turn: cremation, movement and re-collection in the early bronze age of Denmark. In I. Kuijt, C. Quinn, & G. Cooney (Eds.), Transformation by fire: The archaeology of cremation in cultural context (pp. 168–188). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, T. F. (2015). More than a feeling: Towards an archaeology of atmosphere. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 64–73.

  • Stanzel, F. K. (2004). The "Complementary story": outline of a reader-oriented theory of the novel. Style, 38(2), 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G. (2004). Comment to Peter Rowley-Conwy. Current Anthropology, 45(Supplement), S104–S105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömberg, M. (1968). Der Dolmen Trollasten, in St. Köpinge, Schonen (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia, Series in 8°, Vol. 7). Lund: CWK Gleerups Förlag.

  • Tilley, C. (1991a). Constructing a ritual landscape. In K. Jennbert, L. Larsson, R. Petre, & B. Wyszomirska-Werbart (Eds.), Regions and reflections (in honour of Marta Strömberg) (pp. 67–79). Lund: Almquist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1991b). Material culture and text: The art of ambiguity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1996). An ethnography of the neolithic: early prehistoric societies in Southern Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (1994). Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 8: Logic and language (pp. 189–206). Northridge: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (1995). Vagueness: welcome to the quicksand. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (2000). Vagueness and reality. Philosophical Topics, 28(1), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, P. K. (1979). There are no ordinary things. Synthese, 41(2), 411–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, P. K. (1980). The problem of the many. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5, 411–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Deemter, K. (2010). Not exactly: in praise of vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varzi, A. C. (2001). Vagueness in geography. Philosophy and Geography, 4(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willerslev, R. (2011). Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(3), 504–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmore, C. L. (2015). Archaeology and the second empiricism. In C. Hillerdal & J. Siapkas (Eds.), Debating archaeological empiricism: The ambiguity of material evidence (pp. 37–67). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for the thorough and useful critique provided by Fredrik Fahlander and Joan Gero. All mistakes remain my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen, Karen Blixens Vej 4, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark

    Tim Flohr Sørensen

Authors
  1. Tim Flohr Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Flohr Sørensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sørensen, T.F. In Praise of Vagueness: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Archaeological Methodology. J Archaeol Method Theory 23, 741–763 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9257-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9257-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation