Skip to main content
Log in

Palaeolithic Personal Ornaments: Historical Development and Epistemological Challenges

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, archaeological publications concerned with Palaeolithic personal ornaments have diversified. This proliferation has resulted in an intense exploration of the multiple roles, whether symbolic, cultural or social, that these items might have played in prehistoric groups. As a result of this process, there is now a broad consensus that these body adornments are important for exploring the origins of cognitive, artistic and symbolic behavior from an evolutionary perspective. This view contrasts with the conceptualization of Palaeolithic ornaments prevalent during the greater part of the twentieth century. At that time, these objects were rarely considered in debates concerning human evolution, art and symbolism. To explain this shift in the understanding of beads, pendants and other similar artifacts, we explore in this paper the history and the epistemology of the concept of ‘ornament’ in the field of Palaeolithic archaeology. In particular, we analyse the factors underlying why the same kinds of objects have been historically described in very diverse ways. We conclude by pointing out some of the epistemological challenges posed by the current revalorization of personal ornaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1983). Where the two dimensions meet: The Kuba of Zaire. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Structure and cognition in art (pp. 40–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández, E. (2002). Perforated Homalopoma sanguineum from Tito Bustillo (Asturias): mobility of Magdalenian groups in northern Spain. Antiquity, 76, 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández, E. (2009). Magdalenian personal ornaments on the move: a review of the current evidence in Central Europe. Zephyrus, LXIII, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández, E., & Carvajal Contreras, D. R. (Eds.). (2010). Not only Food. Marine, terrestrial and freshwater mollusks in archaeological sites. Munibe, Suplemento 31. San Sebastián: Aranzadi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Fernández, E., & Jöris, O. (2007). Personal ornaments in the Early Upper Palaeolithic of Western Eurasia. An evaluation of the record. Eurasian Prehistory, 5, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, P. G. (Ed.). (2009). An enquiring mind: Studies in honor of Alexander Marshack. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baikie, W. B. (1856). Narrative of an exploring voyage up the rivers Kwóra and Bínue (commonly known as the Niger and Tsádda) in 1854. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M. (2003). Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, H. (1893). The evolution of decorative art. An essay upon its origin and development as illustrated by the art of modern races of mankind. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, M. (1915). La parure aux époques paléolithiques anciennes. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 12, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, J., & Morse, K. H. (2006). Shell beads and social behaviour in Pleistocene Australia. Antiquity, 80, 799–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, J., Davidson, I., McDonald, J., Stern, N., & Veth, P. (2009). Symbolic behaviour and the peopling of the southern arc route to Australia. Quaternary International, 202, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, E. A. (1876). Bead ornaments, employed by the ancient tribes of Utah and Arizona. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, II, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. (1988). Lithic variability and Middle Paleolithic behavior. Oxford: BAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., Clark, G. A., & Cohen, A. (1994). Art as information: explaining Paleolithic art in Europe. World Archaeology, 26, 184–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Van Peer, P. (2009). The chaîne opératoire approach in Middle Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 50, 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Style, grace and information in primitive art. In A. Forge (Ed.), Primitive art and society (pp. 235–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik, R. G. (1997). The role of Pleistocene beads in documenting hominid cognition. Rock Art Research, 14, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beechey, F. W. (1831). Narrative of a voyage to the Pacific and Beering’s strait, to co-operate with the polar expeditions: Performed in His Majesty’s ship Blossom, under the command of Captain F.W. Beechey in the years 1825, 26, 27, 28. London: Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belluci, G. (1900). Echini mesozoici utilizzati dall’uomo dell’età della pietra. Bollettino di Paletnologie Italiana, 3, 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthall, J., & Polhemus, T. (Eds.). (1975). The body as a medium of expression. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, M. (2000). Nineteenth century tools for twenty-first century archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic typology of François Bordes must be replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1977). The anthropology of the body. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1890). The use of masks and head-ornaments on the Northwest coast of America. Internationales Archiv fùr Ethnographie, 3, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1897). The decorative art of the Indians of the North Pacific coast. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 9, 123–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1898). Facial paintings of the Indians of Northern British Columbia. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 2, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Geneste, J.-M., & Meignen, L. (1990). Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancient et moyen. Paléo, 2, 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (1971). Les usages sociaux du corps. Annales. Economie, Société, Civilisations, 26, 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1950). Principes d’une méthode d’étude des techniques de débitage et de la typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. L'Anthropologie, 54, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1953). Essai de classification des industries moustériennes. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 50, 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1961). Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen. Bordeaux: Institut de Préhistoire de l’Université de Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borić, D., & Robb, J. (Eds.). (2008). Past bodies: Body-centered research in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. (2008). Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution. Language and Communication, 28, 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. (2009). Theoretical underpinnings of inferences about language evolution: The syntax used at Blombos Cave. In R. Botha & C. Knight (Eds.), The cradle of human language (pp. 93–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boule, M. (1923). Les Hommes Fossiles. Eléments de Paléontologie Humaine. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzouggar, A., Barton, N., Vanhaeren, M., d’Errico, F., Collcutt, S., Higham, T., et al. (2007). 82,000-year-old shell beads from North African and implications for the origins of modern human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 9964–9969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1987). The evolution of ethnic markers. Cultural Anthropology, 2, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (1997). Rock art and the prehistory of Atlantic Europe: Signing the land. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (2009). Image and audience: Rethinking prehistoric art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitan, L. (1931). La Préhistoire. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartailhac, E. (1889). La France Préhistorique d’après les sépultures et les monuments. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartailhac, E., & Breuil, H. (1906). La caverne d’Altamira à Santillane près Santander (Espagne). Monaco: Imprimerie de Monaco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champier, V. (1883). La Société de l’Union centrale des arts décoratifs : Son histoire, ses débuts, ses doctrines, l’influence qu’elle a exercée sur le goût public par ses concours et par ses expositions. Revue Des Arts Décoratifs, 4, 74–75.

  • Chase, P., & Dibble, H. L. (1987). Middle Paleolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6, 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, G. (1910). Os, ivoires et bois de rennes ouvrés de la Charente. Angoulême: Constantin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, S.-C. (1943). Considérations sur la perforation des perles préhistoriques. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 40, 204–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale, C., & Nash, G. (Eds.). (2004). The figured landscapes of rock-art: Looking at pictures in place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale, C., & Taçon, P. (Eds.). (1998). The archaeology of rock art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. G. D. (1951). Folk-culture and the study of European prehistory. In W. F. Grimes (Ed.), Aspects of archaeology in Britain and beyond. Essays presented to O. G. S. Cramford (pp. 49–65). London: H. W. Edwards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clottes, J. (Ed.). (1990). L’art des objets au paléolithique. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1978). Style and information in cultural evolution: Toward a predictive model for the Paleolithic. In R. Redman, M. J. Berman, E. V. Curtin, W. T. Langhorne, N. M. Versaggi, & J. C. Wanser (Eds.), Social archaeology: Beyond subsistence and dating (pp. 61–85). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1980). Context, structure and efficacy in Paleolithic art and design. In M. L. Foster & S. H. Brandes (Eds.), Symbol as sense. New approaches to the analysis of meaning (pp. 225–248). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1984). To find ourselves: Art and social geography of prehistoric hunter gatherers. In C. Schrire (Ed.), Past and present in hunter gatherer studies (pp. 253–276). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1985). Ritual communication, social elaboration, and the variable trajectories of Paleolithic material culture. In T. D. Price & J. A. Brown (Eds.), Prehistoric hunter-gatherers: The emergence of cultural complexity (pp. 299–323). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1987). New approaches in the search for meaning? A review of research in ‘Paleolithic art’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 14, 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1997). Mobilizing ideologies: Paleolithic ‘art’, gender trouble, and thinking about alternatives. In L. D. Hager (Ed.), Women in human evolution (pp. 172–207). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. (1821). The three voyages of Captain James Cook round the world. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, F. L., & Overmann, K. A. (2012). Numerosity, abstraction, and the emergence of symbolic thinking. Current Anthropology, 53(2), 204–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counihan, C. (1999). The anthropology of food and body: Gender, meaning and power. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca-Solana, D., Gutiérrez-Zugasti, F. G., González-Morales, M. R., Setién-Marquinez, J., Ruiz-Martinez, E., García-Moreno, A., et al. (2013). Shell technology, rock art, and the role of marine resources during the Upper Paleolithic. Current Anthropology, 54, 370–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Azevedo, W. L. (Ed.). (1973a). The traditional artists in African societies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Azevedo, W. L. (1973b). Mask makers and myth in Western Liberia. In A. Forge (Ed.), Primitive art and society (pp. 126–150). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F. (1988). The use of resin cast for the study of use-wear. In S. L. Olsen (Ed.), Scanning electron microscopy in archaeology (pp. 155–167). London: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F. (1989). L’art gravé azilien. Doctoral thesis presented at the Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle.

  • d’Errico, F. (2003). The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., & Nowell, A. (2000). A new look at the Berekhat Ram figurine: implications for the origins of symbolism in the Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10, 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., & Vanhaeren, M. (2009). Earliest personal ornaments and their significance for the origin of language debate. In R. Botha & C. Knight (Eds.), The cradle of human language (pp. 16–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., & Villa, P. (1997). Holes and grooves: the contribution of microscopy and taphonomy to the problem of art origins. Journal of Human Evolution, 33, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., Zilhăo, J., Julien, M., Baffier, D., & Pelegrin, J. (1998). Neanderthal acculturation in western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation. Current Anthropology, 39, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., Henshilwood, C., Lawson, G., Vanhaeren, M., Tillier, A.-M., Soressi, M., et al. (2003). Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music: an alternative multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of World Prehistory, 17, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., Henshilwood, C., Vanhaeren, M., & Van Niekerk, K. (2005). Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., & Wadley, L. (2008). Possible shell beads from the Middle Stone Age layers of Sibudu Cave, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2675–2685.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., Barton, N., Bouzouggar, A., Mienis, H., Richter, D., et al. (2009). Additional evidence on the use of personal ornaments in the Middle Paleolithic of North Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 16051–16056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I. (1997). The power of pictures. In M. W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, & N. G. Jablonski (Eds.), Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol (pp. 128–158). San Francisco: The California Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I. (2003). The archaeological evidence of language origins: States of art. In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 140–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I. (2005/2006). The painting and the tree. Symbolism in the Upper Paleolithic. A tribute to a great Basque scholar. Munibe, 57 (3), 197–205.

  • Davidson, I. (2013). Origins of pictures: An argument for transformation of signs. In K. Sachs-Hombach & J. R. J. Schirra (Eds.), Origins of pictures. Anthropological discourses in image science (pp. 15–45). Cologne: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I., & Noble, W. (1989). The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology, 30, 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I., & Noble, W. (1992). Why the first colonization of the Australian region is the earliest evidence of modern human behavior. Archaeology of Oceania, 27, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, I., & Noble, W. (1993). Tools and language in human evolution. In K. Gibson & T. Ingold (Eds.), Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution (pp. 263–288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beaune, S. A. (2004). The invention of technology: prehistory and cognition. Current Anthropology, 45, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, D., Clapperton, H., Oudney, W., & Salamé, A. V. (1828). Narrative of travels and discoveries in Northern and Central Africa: In the years 1822, 1823, and 1824 (Vol. 2). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. (1989). The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Middle Paleolithic. In P. Mellars & C. Stringer (Eds.), The human revolution: Behavioral and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans (pp. 415–432). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. (2000). Technology and social agency: Outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M. A. (2001). Meaning in the making: Agency and the social embodiment of technology and art. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 47–76). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, J., Kemnitzer, D., & Schneider, D. M. (1977). Symbolic anthropology: A reader in the study of symbols and meanings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolmetsch, H. (1887). Der Ornamentenschatz: Ein Musterbuch stilvoller Ornamente aus Allen Kunst-epochen. Stuttgart: Hoffmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the human mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbstein, R. A. (2011a). The significance of social gestures and technologies of embellishment in Paleolithic portable art. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 18, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbstein, R. A. (2011b). Technologies of art: a critical reassessment of Pavlovian art and society: using chaîne opératoire method and theory. Current Anthropology, 52, 401–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, J. C. (1972). Nuba personal art. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. (1974). The mission of metaphor in expressive culture. Current Anthropology, 15, 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, J. (1971). Pendeloques et Amulettes d’Europe. Anthologie et réflexions. Périgueux: Pierre Fanlac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figuier, L. (1876). L’homme primitif. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. (1876a). Sur les coquilles récentes et fossiles trouvées dans les cavernes du Midi de La France et de la Ligurie. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, 3(IV), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. (1876b). Sur la conchyliologie des cavernes. Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, II(11), 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. (1887). Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossiles. Paris: F. Savy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. (1896). Note sur les coquilles récoltées par M. E. Piette dans la grotte du Mas D’Azil. L'Anthropologie, VI, 633–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. (1897). Quelques remarques sur les coquilles quaternaires récoltées par M. E. Piette dans la grotte du Mas d’Azil (Ariège). Journal de Conchyliologie, XLV, 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P.-H. (1922). Mollusques quaternaires récoltés par M. l’abbé Breuil dans diverses stations préhistoriques d’Espagne. Journal de Conchyliologie, LXVII, 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P.-H. (1923). Mollusques quaternaires récoltés dans la grotte de Castillo (Espagne, Province de Santander). Journal de Conchyliologie, LXVIII, 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P.–. H. (1949a). Rôle des coquillages dans les premières civilisations humaines. Première Partie. Journal de Conchyliologie, LXXXIX(2), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P.-H. (1949b). Rôle des coquillages dans les premières civilisations humaines. Deuxième Partie. Journal de Conchyliologie, LXXXIX(3), 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G., & Loren, D. (2003). Introduction: embodying identity in archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 13, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (1982). Interactions and alliance in Paleolithic society. Man, 17(1), 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (1986). The Paleolithic settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (1991). The social context for European Paleolithic art. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 57(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency. An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraux, L. (1907). Objets de parure solutréens provenant de Laugerie-Haute (Dordogne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 4(4), 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golsenne, T. (2011). Généalogie de la parure. Du blason comme modèle sémiotique au tissu comme modèle organique. Civilisations, 59(2), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H. (1950). The story of art. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziosi, P. (1960). Paleolithic art. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, E. (1914). The beginnings of art. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunevald, R. (1936). Une utilisation des coquilles perforées. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de France, 33(1), 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guébhard, A. (1907a). Sur l’antiquité de superstitions attachées aux coquilles fossiles. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de France, 4(5), 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guébhard, A. (1907b). A propos des superstitions attachées aux fossiles. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de France, 4(8), 412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez Zugasti, F. I. (2011). The use of echinoids and crustaceans as food during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in Northern Spain: methodological contribution and dietary assessment. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 6, 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez Zugasti, F. I., Andersen, S., Araújo, A. C., Dupont, C., Milner, N., & Soares, A. M. M. (2011). Shell middens research in Atlantic Europe: state of the art, research problems and perspectives for the future. Quaternary International, 239, 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, A. C. (1895). Evolution in art. As illustrated by the life-histories of designs. London: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennick, M., & Tarlow, S. (Eds.). (2002). Thinking through the body: Archaeologies of corporeality. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, F. A. (1983). When the map is the territory: Art in Maori culture. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Structure and cognition in art (pp. 74–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, M. A. (1983). The structure of Tarascan pottery painting. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Structure and cognition in art (pp. 8–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, M. (1891). La station quaternaire de Raymonden à Chancelade (Dordogne) et la sepulture d’un chasseur de rennes. Paris: Leroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshilwood, C., & Dubreuil, B. (2011). The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort, 77–59 ka: symbolic material culture and the evolution of mind during the African Middle Stone Age. Current Anthropology, 52(3), 361–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshilwood, C., Vanhaeren, M., Van Niekerk, K., & Jacobs, Z. (2004). Middle Stone Age shell beads from South Africa. Science, 304, 404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1928). Sociologie religieuse et folklore. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, T., Jacobi, R., Julien, M., David, F., Basell, L., Wood, R., et al. (2010). Chronology of the Grotte du Renne (France) and implications for the context of ornaments and human and human remains within the Châtelperronian. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 20234–20239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., Barton, M., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009). The emergence of human uniqueness: characters underlying behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in action; ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., & Orton, G. (1976). Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, W. H. (1853). Ten months among the tents of the Tuski: With incidents of an Arctic boat expedition in search of Sir John Franklin, as far as the Mackenzie River, and Capt Bathurst. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hours, F. (1974). Liste pour le Paléolithique Supérieur et l’Epipaléolithique. Paléorient, 2, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, F. C. (1957). The evolutionary significance of variation and varieties of ‘Neanderthal’ man. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 32(4), 330–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, W. W. (1954). Back of history: The story of our own origins. New York: Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J.-J., Talamo, S., Julien, M., David, F., Connet, N., Bodu, P., et al. (2012). Radiocarbon dates from the Grotte du Renne and Saint-Césaire support a Neanderthal origin for the Châtelperronian. PNAS, 109(46), 18743–18748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, E. (1883). Wampum and its history. The American Naturalist, XVII(5), 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochim, M. (1983). Paleolithic cave art in ecological perspective. In G. N. Bailey (Ed.), Hunther gatherer economy in prehistory (pp. 212–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochim, M. (1987). Late Pleistocene refugia in Europe. In O. Soffer (Ed.), The Pleistocene Old World: Regional perspectives (pp. 317–332). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (1910). The grammar of ornament. London: B. Quaritch [First published in 1856].

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A. (2005). Archaeology of the body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, A. L. (1978). Artificial curiosities being an exposition of native manufactured collected on the three Pacific voyages of Captain James Cook, R. N. at the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. (1924). The antiquity of man. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott [First Published 1915].

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. G. (1989). The human career: human biological and cultural origins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, S. M. (1978). The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings. In M. Greenhalgh & V. Megaw (Eds.), Art in society. Studies in style, culture and aesthetics (pp. 161–173). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeller, P. O. (1951). The modern system of the arts: a study in the history of aesthetics. Part I. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12(4), 496–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1995). Mousterian lithic technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L., & Stiner, M. C. (2007). Body ornamentation as information technology: Towards an understanding of the significance of early beads. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 45–54). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L., Stiner, M. C., Reese, D. S., & Güleç, E. (2001). Ornaments in the earliest upper paleolithic: new results from the levant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 7641–7646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, G. (1964). Essai de typologie systématique. Annali Università di Ferrara, 15, 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, G. (1968). Recherches de typologie analytique. Origini, 2, 7–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartet, H., & Christy, H. (1864). Objets graves et sculptés des temps pré-historiques dans l’Europe Occidental (Extrait de la Revue archéologique). Paris: Librairie Académique Didier et Ce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartet, E., & Christy, H. (1865). Reliquiæ Aquitanicæ; Being Contributions to the Archaeology and Palæontology of Périgord and the Adjoining Provinces of Southern France. Paris: Baillière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R. (1978). Art and visual communication. In M. Greenhalgh & V. Megaw (Eds.), Art in society. Studies in style, culture and aesthetics (pp. 21–30). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavesley, M. G. (2007). A shark tooth ornament from Pleistocene Sahul. Antiquity, 81(312), 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, G. (1880). The minor arts. Porcelain painting, wood-carving, stencilling, modelling, mosaic work, etc. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (Ed.). (2002). Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1958). Études des restes humains fossiles provenant des grottes d’Arcy-sur-Cure. Annales de Paléontologie, 44, 87–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1961). Les fouilles d’Arcy-sur-Cure. Gallia Préhistorique, 4, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole (Vol. 2). Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1995). Préhistoire de l’art occidental. Paris: Mazenod [First published in 1965].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loos, A. (1908). Ornament and crime. In U. Conrads (Ed.), (1970) Programs and manifestoes on 20th century architecture (pp. 19–24). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. (1870). The origin of civilization and the primitive condition of man. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luquet, G.-H. (1926). L’art et la religion des hommes fossiles. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, L. (1837). Narrative of an expedition into the interior of Africa by the River Niger in the steam-vessels Quorra and Alburkah in 1831, 1833 and 1843 (Vol. 2). London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. (1970). Notation dans les gravures du Paléolithique Supérieur. Nouvelles methods d’analyse. Bordeaux: Delmas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. (1972). The roots of civilization: The cognitive beginnings of man’s first art. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. (1976). Some implications of the Paleolithic symbolic evidence for the origin of language. Current Anthropology, 17, 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. (1979). Upper Paleolithic symbol systems of the Russian plain: cognitive and comparative analysis. Current Anthropology, 20, 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshack, A. (1981). On Paleolithic ochre and the early uses of color and symbol. Current Anthropology, 22(2), 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia-Lees, F. (2011). A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1934). Les techniques du corps. Communication présentée à la Société de Psychologie le 17 mai 1943. Journal de Psychology, 32(3–4), 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44, 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (1989). Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 30, 349–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (2005). The impossible coincidence. A single-species model for the origins of modern human behaviour in Europe. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (2010). Neanderthal symbolism and ornament manufacture: the bursting of a bubble? Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 20147–20148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, F. S. (1886). Ornamentale Formenlehre; eine systematische Zusammenstellung des Wichtigsten aus dem Gebiete der Ornamentik, zum Gebrauch für Schulen, Musterzeichner, Architekten und Gewerbetreibende. Leipzig: Seemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. J. (2005). The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. J. (2009). Holistic communication and the co-evolution of language and music: Resurrecting and old idea. In R. Botha & C. Knight (Eds.), The prehistory of language (pp. 58–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Abadía, O. (2006). Art, crafts and Paleolithic art. Journal of Social Archaeology, 6(1), 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Abadía, O., & González Morales, M. R. (2008). Paleolithic art studies at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Journal of Anthropological Research, 64(4), 529–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Abadía, O., & González Morales, M. R. (2013). Paleolithic art. A cultural history. Journal of Archaeological Research, 21, 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphy, H. (1977). Too many meanings: an analysis of the artistic system of the Yoingu of Northeast Arnhem land. Doctoral Thesis. Australian National University.

  • Morse, K. (1993). Shell beads from Mandu Mandu Creek rockshelter, Cape Range peninsula, Western Australia, dated before 30,000 B.P. Antiquity, 67, 877–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortillet, G. (1869). Promenades au Musée de Saint-Germain. Paris: Reinwald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortillet, G. (1883). Le Préhistorique. Antiquité de l’Homme. Paris: Reinwald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortillet, G., & Mortillet, A. (1881). Musée Préhistorique. Paris: Reinwald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. D. (1964). Visual categories, an approach to the study of representational systems. American Anthropologist, 68, 936–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. D. (1973a). Walbiri iconography. Graphic representation and cultural symbolism in a central Australian society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. D. (1973b). The spatial presentation of cosmic order in Walbiri iconography. In A. Forge (Ed.), Primitive art and society (pp. 193–220). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. R. (1986). Pintupi country, Pintupi self: Sentiment, place and politics among Western desert Aborigines. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997). Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology, 38, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. R., Kielman, D., Constandse-Westermann, T. S., Van der Sanden, W. A., & Van Gijn, A. (1990). An inquiry into the ethnic resolution of Mesolithic regional groups: The study of their decorative ornaments in time and space. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1991). The evolutionary emergence of modern human behavior: language and its archaeology. Man, 26(2), 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1996). Human evolution, language, and mind: A psychological and archaeological Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, A. (2001). The re-emergence of cognitive archaeology. In A. Nowell (Ed.), In the mind’s eye: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the evolution of human intelligence (pp. 20–32). Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, A. (2010). Working memory and the speed of life. Current Anthropology, 51(1), S121–S133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, A., & d’Errico, F. (2007). The art of taphonomy and the taphonomy of art: layer IV, Molodova I, Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, A., & Davidson, I. (Eds.). (2010). Stone tools and the evolution of human cognition. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, M. (1989). Reading the skin. Adornment, display and society among the Wahgi. London: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme, B. (1974). Twentieth-century prehistorians and the idea of ethnographic parallels. Man, 9(2), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (1974). Observations sur le débitage et le façonnage de l’ivoire dans l’Aurignacien en Belgique. In H. Camps-Faber (Ed.), Premier colloque international sur l’industrie de l’os dans la préhistoire (pp. 93–96). Aix-en-Provence: Éditions de l’Université de Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmann, K. (2013). Material scaffolds in numbers and time. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(1), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, E. (1994). Perspective as symbolic form. New York: Zone Books [First published in 1924].

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulme, D. (1973). Adornment and nudity in Tropical Africa. In A. Forge (Ed.), Primitive art and society (pp. 11–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (1993). A framework for analyzing prehistoric stone tool manufacture and a tentative application to some early lithic industries. In A. Berthelet & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), The use of tools by human and non-human primates (pp. 302–314). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlès, C. (1992). In search of lithic strategies: A cognitive approach to prehistoric chipped stone assemblages. In J. C. Gardin & C. S. Peebles (Eds.), Representations in archaeology (pp. 223–247). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrony, C. (1914). Éléments de préhistoire. Ussel: Eyboulet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J. E. (1982). The creative explosion: An inquiry into the origins of art and religion. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piette, E. (1871). Les grottes de Gourdan (Haute-Garonne). Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, II(6), 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piette, E. (1873). Sur la grotte de Gourdan. Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, II(8), 384–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piette, E. (1907). L’art pendant l’âge du renne. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhemus, T. (Ed.). (1978). Social aspects of the human body. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racinet, A. (1869). L’ornement polychrome. Paris: Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranke, J. (1879). Anfänge der Kunst: Anthropologische Beiträge zur Geschichte des Ornaments. Vortrag geh. im Kunstgewerbe-Verein in München den 28. Jan. 1879. In R. Virchow & F. von Holtzendorff (Eds.), Sammlung gemeinverständlicher wissenschaftlicher Vorträge (pp. 313–336). Berlin: Carl Habel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, S. (1913). Répertoire de l’art quaternaire. Paris: Érnest Leroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1982). Towards and archaeology of mind (Inaugural lecture). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., & Zubrow, E. B. W. (1994). The ancient mind: Elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegl, A. (1992). Problems of style. Foundations for a history of ornament. Princeton: Princeton University Press [First published in 1893].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, É. (1887). De l’antiquité de l’homme dans les Alpes maritimes. Paris: Baillière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, E. (1903). Les parures en coquillages. Bulletin et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, V(4), 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, E. (1904). Bracelets, parures, monnaies d'échanges, fétiches. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 1(3), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, É. (1905). Sur l’emploie des Dentales aux temps préhistoriques comme ornament. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de France, 2(6), 286–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochebrune, A. T. (1882). De l’emploi des mollusques chez les peuples anciens et modernes. Première partie. Revue d’Ethnographie, I, 465–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebroeks, W., & Verpoorte, A. (2009). A ‘language-free’ explanation for differences between the European Middle and Upper Paleolithic record. In R. Botha & C. Knight (Eds.), The cradle of human language (pp. 150–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, G. (1990). Mind, body, and culture: Anthropology and the biological interface. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasin, F., Stehlin H. -G., & Studer, T. (1918). Die Steinzeitlichen Stationen des Birstales zwischen Basel und Delsberg. Basel & Lyon: Verlag Georg & Co.

  • Schlanger, N. (1990). Techniques as human action: two perspectives. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. (1996). Understanding Levallois: lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 6, 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. R. (1912). Der Diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, C., & Carpenter, E. (1986). Materials for the study of social symbolism in ancient and tribal art: A record of tradition and continuity (Vol. 3). New York: Rock Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, A. (1975). The meaning of body ornaments: a Suya example. Ethnology, 14(3), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, A. (1981). Nature and society in central Brazil. The Suya Indians of Mato Grosso. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semper, G. (1860). Style in the technical and tectonic arts of practical aesthetics. A handbook for technicians, artists, and patrons of art. In G. Semper (Ed.), (1989) The four elements of architecture and other writings (pp. 181–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, L. (2001). The invention of art: A cultural history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieveking, A. (1976). Settlement patterns of the later Magdalenian in the central Pyrenees. In G. Sieveking, I. Longworth, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Problems in economic and social archaeology (pp. 583–603). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieveking, A. (1978). La significación de las distribuciones en el arte paleolítico. Trabajos de Prehistoria, 35, 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieveking, A. (1979). The cave artists. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. L. (1989). Art Nouveau in Fin-de-Siècle France. Politics, psychology, and style. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908). Excursus on jewelry and adornment. In G. Simmel (Ed.), (2009) Sociology. Inquiries into the construction of social forms (Vol. 1, pp. 332–342). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1991). The problem of style. Theory, Culture and Society, 8, 63–71 [First published in 1909].

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (2008). People and things: A behavioral approach to material culture. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. E. (Ed.). (1931). Early man: His origin, development and culture. London: Benn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, O. (2000). Gravettian technologies in social contexts. In W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, L. Svoboda, & K. Fennema (Eds.), Hunters of the Golden Age: The Mid Upper Palaeolithic of Eurasia, 30,000–20,000 BP (pp. 59–75). University of Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology.

  • Soffer, O., & Conkey, M. (1997). Studying ancient visual cultures. In M. W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, & N. G. Jablonski (Eds.), Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol (pp. 1–16). San Francisco: The California Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, O., Adovasio, J. M., & Hyland, D. C. (2000). The ‘Venus’ figurines: textiles, basketry, gender and status in the Upper Paleolithic. Current Anthropology, 4, 511–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soressi, M., & D’Errico, F. (2007). Pigments, gravures, parures: Les comportements symboliques controversés des Néandertaliens. In B. Vandermeersch & B. Maureille (Eds.), Les Néandertaliens. Biologie et cultures (pp. 297–309). Paris: CTHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soressi, M., & Geneste, J. M. (2011). The history and efficacy of the Chaîne Opératoire approach to lithic analysis: Studying techniques to reveal past societies in an evolutionary perspective. In G. B. Tostevin (Ed.), Reduction sequence, Chaîne Opératoire and other methods. The epistemologies of different approaches to lithic analysis. Special issue : PaleoAnthropology, 334–350.

  • Speltz, A. (1915). Das farbige Ornament aller historischen Stile. Leipzig: Baumgärtner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, R. E. C. (1877). Aboriginal shell money. The American Naturalist, 11(6), 344–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, R. E. C. (1889). Ethno-conchology: A study of primitive money. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiner, M., Kuhn, S., & Güleç, E. (2013). Early Upper Paleolithic shell beads at Üçağızlı Cave I (Turkey): technology and the socioeconomic context of ornament life-histories. Journal of Human Evolution, 64(5), 380–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, A., & Strathern, M. (1971). Self-decoration in Mount Hagen. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, D. (2003). Real spaces: World art history and the rise of western modernism. London: Phaidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborin, Y. (1977). La sépulture collective mégalithique de l’usine Vivez à Argenteuil (Val-d’Oise). Les objets de parure. Gallia Préhistoire, 20(1), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborin, Y. (1993). La parure en coquillage au Paléolithique: XXIXe supplément à Gallia préhistoire. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborin, Y. (2004). Langage sans parole: La parure aux temps préhistoriques. Paris: La Maison des Roches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieullen, A. (1901). Silex bijoux diluviens. Bulletins de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, V(2), 603–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, J. (1963). Typologie de l’Epipaléolithique du Maghreb. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomásková, S. (1997). Places of art: Art and archaeology. In M. W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, & N. G. Jablonski (Eds.), Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol (pp. 265–287). San Francisco: Allen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols. Aspects of Ndembu ritual. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. S. (1977). Cosmetics: The language of bodily adornment. In J. P. Spradley & D. W. McCurdy (Eds.), Conformity and conflict: Readings in cultural anthropology (pp. 98–107). Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. S. (1980). The social skin. In I. Cherfas & R. Lewin (Eds.), Not work alone: A cross-cultural view of activities superfluous to survival (pp. 112–140). London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (1984). The body and society: Explorations in social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko, P. J. (Ed.). (1977). Form in indigenous art. Schematisation in the art of aboriginal Australia and prehistoric Europe. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, P. (2007). Refitting of reduction sequences, formal classification systems and Middle Paleolithic individuals at work. In U. Schurmans & M. De Bie (Eds.), Fitting rocks: Lithic refitting examined (pp. 91–104). Oxford: BAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wetter, G. (1920). Les origines de la parure aux temps paléolithiques. Bruxelles: Mémoires de l’Académie Royale de Belgique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M. (2005). Speaking with beads: The evolutionary significance of personal ornaments. In F. d’Errico & L. Blackwell (Eds.), From tools to symbols: From early hominids to modern humans (pp. 525–553). Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M. (2010). Les fonctions de la parure au Paléolithique Supérieur : De l’individu à l’unité culturelle. Sarrebruck: Editions Universitaires Européennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M., & d’Errico, F. (2006). Aurignacian ethno-linguistic geography of Europe revealed by personal ornaments. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1105–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M., & d’Errico, F. (2011). L’émergence du corps paré. Objets corporels paléolithiques. Civilisations, 59(2), 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M., d’Errico, F., Van Niekerk, K. L., Henshilwood, C. S., & Erasmus, R. M. (2013). Thinking strings: additional evidence for personal ornament use in the Middle Stone Age at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 64(6), 500–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veth, P., Stern, N., McDonald, J., Balme, J., & Davidson, I. (2011). The role of information exchange in the colonisation of Sahul. In R. Whallon, W. Lovis, & R. K. Hitchcock (Eds.), Information and its role in hunter-gatherer bands: Ideas, debates and perspectives 5 (pp. 203–220). Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (1977). A symmetry analysis of Upper Gila area ceramic design. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (Ed.). (1983). Structure and cognition in art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenreich, F. (1943). The ‘Neanderthal man’ and the ancestors of ‘Homo sapiens’. American Anthropologist, 45(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenreich, F. (1946). Apes, giants and man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernert, P. (1952). Homo Estheticus. In H. Berr (Ed.), A la recherche de la mentalité préhistorique (pp. 169–202). Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whallon, R. (2006). Social networks and information: non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25, 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1982). Rethinking the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition. Current Anthropology, 23, 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1989a). Production complexity and standardization in early Aurignacian bead and pendant manufacture: Evolutionary implications. In P. Mellars & C. Stringer (Eds.), The human revolution: Behavioral and biological perspectives in the origins of modern humans (pp. 360–399). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1989b). Visual thinking in the Ice Age. Scientific American, 261(1), 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1992). Beyond art: toward an understanding of the origins of material representation in Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1995). Ivory personal ornaments of Aurignacian age: Technological, social and symbolic perspectives. In J. Hahn, M. Menu, Y. Taborin, P. Walter, & F. Widemann (Eds.), Le travail et l'usage de l'ivoire au Paléolithique Supérieur (pp. 29–62). Ravello: Centre Universitaire Européen pour les Biens Culturels.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1997). Substantial acts: From materials to meaning in Paleolithic representations. In M. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, & N. G. Jablonski (Eds.), Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol (pp. 93–121). San Francisco: California Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2001). Personal ornaments from the Grotte du Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure. Athena Review, 2(4), 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2007). Systems of personal ornamentation in the Early Upper Palaeolithic: Methodological challenges and new observations. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 287–302). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. B. (1858). Fiji and the Fijians. London: A. Heylin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In C. Cleland (Ed.), For the Director: Research essays in honor of James B. Griffin (pp. 317–342). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfflin, H. (1950). Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art. New York: Dover [First published in 1915].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wreschner, E. (1980). Red ochre and human evolution: a case for discussion. Current Anthropology, 21, 631–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 63–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2007). Did a small but a significant enhancement in working-memory capacity power the evolution of modern thinking? In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 79–90). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2010). Symbolism and language. An introduction to supplement 1, working memory. Current Anthropology, 51(1), S5–S16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. G. (1877). Notes on the Aboriginal money of California. The American Naturalist, 11(1), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zervos, C. (1959). L’art de l’époque du Renne en France. Paris: Cahier d’Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilhão, J. (2007). The emergence of ornaments and art: an archaeological perspective on the origin of ‘behavioral modernity’. Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research for this paper was supported by the Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada), the University of Victoria (Canada) and the Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (France). We are grateful to those colleagues who offer assistance with our research on personal ornamentations, including Manuel R. González Morales, Randall White, Rudolph Botha, Jean Clottes, Margaret Conkey and, especially, Iain Davidson. The final version of the paper has greatly benefited from the critical comments of the editors of the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Moro Abadía.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abadía, O.M., Nowell, A. Palaeolithic Personal Ornaments: Historical Development and Epistemological Challenges. J Archaeol Method Theory 22, 952–979 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-014-9213-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-014-9213-z

Keywords

Navigation