Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction to Discontinuities and Continuities: Theories, Methods and Proxies for a Historical and Sociological Approach to Evolution of Past Societies

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barker, G., & Richards, M. B. (2013). Foraging–farming transitions in island southeast Asia. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Bintliff, J. L. (2006). Time, structure, and agency: the annales, emergent complexity, and archaeology. In J. L. Bintliff (Ed.), A companion to archaeology (pp. 174–192). New York: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1953). Georges Gurvitch ou la discontinuité du social. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 8, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1958). Histoire et sciences sociales: La longue durée. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 13, 725–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courty, M. A., & Coqueugniot, E. (2013). A microfacies toolkit for revealing linkages between cultural discontinuities and exceptional geogenic events: the Tell Dja’dé case study (NE Syria). Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Craver, C. F. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2006). Mechanism. In S. Sarkar & J. Pfeifer (Eds.), Philosophy of science: an encyclopedia (pp. 469–478). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallay, A. (1989). Logicism: a French view of archaeological theory founded in computational perspective. Antiquity, 63, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallay, A. (2011). Pour une ethnoarchéologie théorique. Paris: Editions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardin, J.-C. (1980). Archaeological constructs: an aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardin, J. C. (1989). The role of “local knowledge” in archaeological interpretation. In S. J. Shennan (Ed.), Archaeological approaches to cultural identity (pp. 110–122). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardin, J.-C., & Roux, V. (2004). The Arkeotek project: a European network of knowledge bases in archaeology of techniques. Archeologia e calcolatori, 15, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1998). Practical and prestige technologies: the evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A. (2013). How the pueblos got their sprachbund. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Kohler, T. A., Bocinsky, R. K., Cockburn, D., Crabtree, S. D., Varien, M. D., Kolm, K. E., et al. (2012). Modelling prehispanic pueblo societies in their ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 241, 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., van Buskirk, S., & Ruscavage-Barz, S. (2004). Vessels and villages: evidence for conformist transmission in early village aggregations on the Parajito Plateau, New Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (2013). Questions of complexity and scale in explanations for cultural transitions in the Pleistocene: a case study from the early upper paleolithic. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Mesoudi, A. (2007). Using the methods of social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 1, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2009). Placing archaeology within a unified science of cultural evolution. In S. J. Shennan (Ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution (pp. 21–32). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F. D. (1995). Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity, 60, 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlès, C. (2013). Tempi of change: when soloists don’t play together. Arrhythmia in ‘continuous’ change. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Perlès, C. (1992). In search of lithic strategies: a cognitive approach to prehistoric chipped stone assemblage. In J.-C. Gardin & C. S. Peebles (Eds.), Representations in archaeology (pp. 223–247). Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, V. (2013). Spreading of innovative technical traits and cumulative technical evolution: continuity or discontinuity? Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Roux, V. (2003). A dynamic systems framework for studying technological change: application to the emergence of the potter’s wheel in the southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 10, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, V. (2007). Ethnoarchaeology: a non-historical science of reference necessary for interpreting the past. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14, 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology, 28, 595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity, 62, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J. (2013). Demographic continuities and discontinuities in Neolithic Europe: evidence, methods and implications. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Shennan, S. J. (Ed.). (2009). Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J., & Wilkinson, J. R. (2001). Ceramic style change and neutral evolution: a case study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity, 66, 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G. (2013). After the deep freeze: confronting “Magdalenian” realities in Cantabrian Spain and beyond. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory, 20.

  • Théry, F. (2010). Le concept de mécanisme en biologie. Perspectives historique et épistémologique. Philosciences.com (www.philosciences.com/Vivant/Mécanisme.html).

  • Valentin, B. (2008). Jalons pour une paléohistoire des derniers chasseurs: (XIVe-VIe millénaire avant J.-C.). Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks are due to James Skibo who participated in the workshop and who kindly proposed that we submit the proceedings to the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. The workshop was organised in collaboration with Virginie Guillomet-Malmassari. We would like to thank her warmly for her strong support as well as the quality of her contribution. The workshop has been funded by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche within the framework of the project “Corpus Logicistes en Archéologie des Techniques” (ANR-07-CORP-006 (2008–2010)). The lab “Préhistoire & Technologie” (UMR 7055) is also thanked for its help holding the workshop. Gérard Monthel has drawn all the logicist diagrams.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, UMR 7055, Nanterre, France

    Valentine Roux

  2. CNRS, PROMES, Perpignan, France

    Marie-Agnès Courty

  3. Maison René Ginouvès, 21 allée de l’université, 92023, Nanterre cedex, France

    Valentine Roux

Authors
  1. Valentine Roux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marie-Agnès Courty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentine Roux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roux, V., Courty, MA. Introduction to Discontinuities and Continuities: Theories, Methods and Proxies for a Historical and Sociological Approach to Evolution of Past Societies. J Archaeol Method Theory 20, 187–193 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-013-9170-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-013-9170-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation