Skip to main content
Log in

Lithic Modes A–I: A New Framework for Describing Global-Scale Variation in Stone Tool Technology Illustrated with Evidence from the East Mediterranean Levant

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grahame Clark’s framework for describing stone tool assemblages in terms of five technological “modes” enjoys wide use in European, African, and Asian prehistory. With greater usage and increases in the global archaeological database for prehistory, problems and weaknesses of Clark’s framework have become apparent. This paper reviews these problems and proposes an updated framework, modes A–I, for describing variability in stone tool production strategies. The value of this new framework for prehistory is illustrated using data from the East Mediterranean Levant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almogi-Labin, A., Bar-Matthews, M., & Ayalon, A. (2002). Land–sea climate variability in the Middle East during the Late Quaternary. In N. Goren-Inbar (Ed.), Human paleoecology in the Levantine corridor. Jerusalem: Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291, 1748–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S. H. (2002). Small things remembered: Origins of Early Microlithic industries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In R. G. Elston & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization (pp. 9–30). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association. Archaeological Paper No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S. J., & Lorenz, K. G. (1990). Social and ecological models for the Middle Stone Age in Southern Africa. In P. A. Mellars (Ed.), The emergence of modern humans: Archaeological perspectives (pp. 3–33). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrefsky, W. J. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic approaches to analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, D. B., & Bleed, P. (1997). Technology, flaked stone technology, and risk. In C. M. Barton & G. A. Clark (Eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary theory and archeological explanation (pp. 109–139). Washington: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar Yosef, O. (2006). Between observations and models: An eclectic view of Middle Paleolithic archaeology. In E. Hovers & S. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 305–325). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barham, L. (2002). Backed tools in Middle Pleistocene central Africa and their evolutionary significance. Journal of Human Evolution, 43, 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham, L., & Mitchell, P. (2008). The first Africans: African archaeology from the earliest toolmakers to most recent foragers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, R., (2005). Flint and stone axes as cultural markers. Socio-Economic changes as reflected in Holocene flint tool Industries of the Southern Levant. ex oriente, Berlin.

  • Barkai, R., Lemorini, C., Shimelmitz, R., Lev, Z., Stiner, M. C., & Gopher, A. (2009). A blade for all seasons? Making and using Amudian blades at Qesem Cave, Israel. Human Evolution, 24, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., Olszewski, D. I., & Coinman, N. R. (1996). Beyond the graver: Reconsidering burin function. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (1970). The Epipalaeolithic cultures of Palestine. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (1980). Prehistory of the Levant. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (2002). The Upper Paleolithic revolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2010). The Levantine Upper Palaeolithic and Epipalaeolithic. In E. Garcea (Ed.), South-Eastern Mediterranean People between 130,000–10,000 years ago (pp. 144–167). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Goren-Inbar, N. (1993). The lithic assemblages of ‘Ubeidiya. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Kuhn, S. L. (1999). The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution. American Anthropologist, 101, 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Meignen, L. (1992). Insights into Levantine Middle Palaeolithic Cultural Variability. In H. Dibble & P. Mellars (Eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, behavior and variability (pp. 163–182). Philadelphia: The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Van Peer, P. (2009). The Chaine Operatoire approach in Middle Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 50, 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basell, L. S. (2008). Middle Stone Age (MSA) site distributions in eastern Africa and their relationship to Quaternary environmental change, refugia and the evolution of Homo sapiens. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27, 2484–2498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. J. (1945). New finds of hafted Neolithic celts. Acta Archaeologica, 16, 156–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfer-Cohen, A., & Goring-Morris, A. N. (2007). From the beginning: Levantine Upper Palaeolithic cultural change and chronology. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution (pp. 199–206). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1978). From gatherer-hunter to farmer: A social perspective. World Archaeology, 10, 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béyries, S. (1987). Quelques exemples des stigmates d’émmanchements observés sur des outils du Paléolithique moyen. In D. Stordeur (Ed.), Le Main et l’outil: Manches et émmanchements préhistoriques (pp. 55–62). Lyon: Éditions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D. W., & O’Connell, J. F. (2006). Behavioral ecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 14, 143–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability? American Antiquity, 51, 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleed, P. (1996). Risk and cost in Japanese microblade technology. Lithic Technology, 21, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleed, P. (2002). Cheap, regular, and reliable: Implications of design variation in Late Pleistocene Japanese microblade technology. In R. G. Elston & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Thinking small: Global perspectives on microlithization (pp. 95–102). Washington: American Anthropological Association. Archaeological Paper No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E. (1997). Le Concept Levallois: Variabilité des Méthodes. Monograph du Centre de Recherche Archéologique 9. Paris: Centre Nationale de Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Geneste, J.-M., & Meignen, L. (1990). Identification de chaines opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paleo, 2, 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1968). The Old Stone Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. J., & Kuhn, S. L. (2001). Constraints on Levallois core technology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 747–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cann, J. R., Dixon, J. E., & Renfrew, C. (1969). Obsidian analysis and the obsidian trade. In D. Brothwell & E. Higgs (Eds.), Science in archaeology. A survey of progress and research (pp. 578–591). London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauvin, J. (1968). Fouilles de Byblos IV :les outillages néolithiques de Byblos et du littoral libanais. Paris: Libraire d’Amérique et d’Orient, Adrien Maisonneuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, M. (1997). Redefining Levallois. Journal of Human Evolution, 33, 719–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1936). Man makes himself. London: C.A Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (1968). Prehistoric Europe: The economic basis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (1969). World prehistory: A new synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. D. (1984). The cultures of the Middle Palaeolithic/Middle Stone Age. In J. D. Clark (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Africa (pp. 248–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1997). Prismatic blademaking, craftsmanship, and production. Ancient Mesoamerica, 8, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., & Riel-Salvatore, J. (2006). Observations on systematics in Paleolithic archaeology. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition (pp. 29–57). New York: Plenum/Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L. (1976). Mesolithic Europe: The economic basis. In G. Sieveking, J. H. Longworth, & K. E. Wilson (Eds.), Problems in economic and social archaeology (pp. 444–481). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, N. J. (1990). Laminar lithic assemblages from the last interglacial complex in Northwestern Europe. Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, N. J., & Fischer, B. (2000). Are there recognizable cultural entities in the German Middle Paleolithic? In A. Ronen & M. Weinstein-Evron (Eds.), Toward modern humans: Yabrudian and Micoquian, 400–50 k years ago (Vol. Series S850, pp. 7–24). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, N. J., Soressi, M., Parkington, J. E., Wurz, S., & Yates, R. (2004). A unified lithic taxonomy based on patterns of core reduction. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 59, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, D. E. (1968). Mesoamerican polyhedral cores and prismatic blades. American Antiquity, 33, 446–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crew, H. L. (1976). The Mousterian site of Rosh Ein Mor. In A. E. Marks (Ed.), Prehistory and Paleoenvironments of the Central Negev, Israel (Vol. 1, pp. 75–112). Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowfoot-Payne, J. (1983). The flint industries of Jericho. In K. M. Kenyon & T. A. Holland (Eds.), Excavations at Jericho (pp. 622–759). London: The British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debénath, A., & Dibble, H. L. (1994). Handbook of paleolithic typology, Vol. 1: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennell, R. (1983). European economic prehistory. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennell, R. (2009). The Palaeolithic settlement of Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1991). Mousterian assemblage variability on an interregional scale. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47, 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 299–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., & Bar-Yosef, O. (1995). The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Monographs in World Archaeology, No. 23. Madison: Prehistory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., & McPherron, S. P. (2006). The missing Mousterian. Current Anthropology, 47, 777–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, F. P. (1980). Making ground stone tools. Archaeology in Oceania, 15, 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, F. P. (1982). Australian stone hatchets: A study in design and dynamics. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1971). Systematics in prehistory. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitam, D. (2005). Epipalaeolithic rock-cut installations and groundstone tools in the Southern Levant. Methodology and classification system. Paléorient, 35, 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren, M. I., & Bradley, B. A. (2009). Experimental evaluation of the Levallois “core shape maintenance” hypothesis. Lithic Technology, 34, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren, M. I., Greenspan, A., & Sampson, C. G. (2008). Are Upper Paleolithic blade cores more productive than Middle Paleolithic discoidal cores? A replication experiment. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 952–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eren, M. I., Bradley, B., & Sampson, C. G. (2011). Middle Paleolithic skill level and the individual knapper: An experiment. American Antiquity, 76, 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, B. (2001). Grahame Clark: An intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. A. (1987). Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: how are they related? Antiquity, 61, 380–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R., & Lahr, M. M. (1997). Mode 3 technologies and the evolution of modern humans. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 7, 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison, G. C. (1969). A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity, 33, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (1986). The Palaeolithic settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (1999). The Palaeolithic societies of Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C. (2007). Origins and revolutions: Human identity in earliest prehistory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Y. (2009). The transition from Neolithic to Chalcolithic in the Southern Levant: The material culture sequence. In J. Shea & D. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Transitions in prehistory: Essays in honor of O. Bar-Yosef (pp. 325–330). Oxford: Oxbow Books for the American Schools of Oriental Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, D. A. E., & Bate, D. M. A. (1937). The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, Vol. 1: Excavations in the Wady el-Mughara. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, I. (2009). The Neolithic–Chalcolithic transition in the Southern Levant: Late sixth-fifth millennium culture history. In J. Shea & D. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Transitions in Prehistory: Essays in Honor of O. Bar-Yosef (pp. 339–359). Oxford: Oxbow Books for the American Schools of Oriental Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, A. (1994). Arrowheads from the Neolithic Levant: A seriation analysis. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, A., Barkai, R., Shimelmitz, R., Khalaidy, M., Lemorini, C., Hershkovitz, I., & Stiner, M. (2005). Qesem Cave: An Amudian Site in Central Israel. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society, 35, 62–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar, N. (1985). The lithic assemblage of the Berekhat Ram Acheulian Site, Golan Heights. Paléorient, 11, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar, N. (1988). Too small to be true? Re-evaluation of cores on flakes in Levantine Mousterian assemblages. Lithic Technology, 17, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar, N. (1990). Quneitra: A Mousterian site on the Golan Heights. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Institute of Archaeology. Qedem No. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar, N., Feibel, C. S., Verosub, K. L., Melamed, Y., Kislev, M. E., Tchernov, E., & Saragusti, I. (2000). Pleistocene milestones on the out-of-Africa Corridor at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Science, 289, 944–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goring-Morris, A. N., Hovers, E., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2009). The dynamics of Pleistocene and Early Holocene settlement patterns and human adaptations in the Levant: An overview. In J. J. Shea & D. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Transitions in prehistory: Essays in honor of Ofer Bar-Yosef (pp. 185–252). Oakville: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A., Koster, D. A., & Sontz, A. (1971). The lithic assemblage of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia. American Antiquity, 36, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesch, A. P. (2007). Modeling ground slate knife production and implications for the study of household labor contributions to salmon fishing on the Pacific Northwest Coast. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 576–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, M. (2011). Speciation, diversity, and mode 1 technologies: The impact of variability selection. Journal of Human Evolution, 61, 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, M., Hernandez-Aguilar, A., Ling, V., Carvalho, S., de la Torre, I., DeStefano, A., Du, A., Hardy, B., Harris, J., Marchant, L., Matsuzawa, T., McGrew, W., Mercader, J., Mora, R., Petraglia, M., Roche, H., Visalberghi, E., & Warren, R. (2009). Primate archaeology. Nature, 460, 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1979). Palaeolithic reflections: Lithic technology and ethnographic excavations among Australian Aborigines. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1989). From chopper to celt: The evolution of resharpening techniques. In R. Torrence (Ed.), Time, Energy and Stone Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B., & Nelson, M. W. (1981). The use of chipped lithic material in the contemporary Maya Highlands. American Antiquity, 46, 885–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. O. (1989). From foraging to agriculture: The Levant at the end of the Ice Age. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. O. (1994). Prehistoric cultural ecology in Southern Jordan. Science, 265, 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity, 56, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S., & Douglas, M. (2012). A twenty-first century archaeology of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (in press)

  • Holdaway, S., & Stern, N. (2004). A record in stone: The study of Australia’s flaked stone artifacts. Melbourne: Museum Victoria/Aborignal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovers, E. (2006). Neanderthals and modern humans in the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant: What kind of interaction? In N. Conard (Ed.), When Neanderthals and Modern Humans Met (pp. 65–85). Tübingen: Kerns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovers, E. (2009). The lithic assemblages of Qafzeh Cave. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, G. L. (1984). The earliest archaeological traces. In J. D. Clark (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 157–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, A. J. (1982). The Tabun cave and Paleolithic man in the Levant. Science, 216, 1369–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. R., & McBrearty, S. (2010). 500,000 year old blades from the Kapthurin Formation, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 58, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, N. D. (1987). Stone age spear and arrow points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States: A modern survey and reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1982). Hafting and retooling: Effects on the archaeological record. American Antiquity, 47, 798–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. L. (1988). The three sides of a biface. American Antiquity, 53, 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, H. (1988). Upper Paleolithic burins: Type, form and function (Vol. Series 434). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity, 73, 518–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1991). “Unpacking” reduction: Lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of west-central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10, 76–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1993). Mousterian Technology as Adaptive Response: A Case Study. In G. L. Peterkin, H. Bricker, & P. A. Mellars (Eds.), Hunting and animal exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia (pp. 25–48). Washington: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1995). Mousterian lithic technology: An ecological perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (2003). In what sense is the Levantine Initial Upper Paleolithic a “transitional” industry? In J. Zilhao & F. d’Errico (Eds.), The chronology of the Aurignacian and transitional complexes. Dating, stratigraphies and cultural implications (pp. 61–68). Lisbon: Instituto Português Arqueologia. Trabajos de Arqueologia No. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (2004a). Evolutionary perspectives on technology and technological change. World Archaeology, 36, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (2004b). Upper Paleolithic raw material economies at Üçagizli Cave, Turkey. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 431–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S., & Elston, R. G. (2002). Introduction: Thinking Small Globally. In R. G. Elston & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Thinking small: Global perspectives on microlithization (pp. 1–8). Washington: American Anthropological Association. Archaeological Paper No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahr, M. M., & Foley, R. (1994). Multiple dispersals and modern human origins. Evolutionary Anthropology, 3, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. L. (1991). Narratives of human evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, L. S. B. (1954). Adam’s ancestors. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepre, C. J., Roche, H., Kent, D. V., Harmand, S., Quinn, R. L., Brugal, J.-P., Texier, P.-J., Lenoble, A., & Feibel, C. S. (2011). An earlier origin for the Acheulian. Nature, 477, 82–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1943). Evolution et Techniques: L’Homme et La Matiere. Paris: Éditions Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge: MIT Press (translated by Anna Bostock Berger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, T. E. (1995). Archaeology of Society in the Holy Land (p. 624). New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S. J. (2007). Why is there a lack of Mode 3 Levallois technologies in East Asia? A phylogenetic test of the Movius-Schick hypothesis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 541–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S. J. (2009). Understanding ancient hominin dispersals using artefactual data: a phylogeographic analysis of Acheulean handaxes. PLoS ONE, 4(10), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marciniak, A., & Coles, J. M. (2010). Grahame Clark and his legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. (1983a). The sites of Boker Tachtit and Boker. Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel Volume 3: The Avdat/Aqev Area (Part 3). Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. E. (1983b). The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Levant. In F. Wendorf & A. E. Close (Eds.), Advances in world archaeology (pp. 51–98). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. E. (1988). The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Southern Levant: Technological change as an adaptation to increasing mobility. In J. Kozlowski (Ed.), L’Homme de Neandertal: La Mutation (pp. 109–124). Liège: ERAUL: Université de Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. S. (2007). Behavioral ecological models of lithic technological change during the later Middle Stone Age of South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1738–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, W. C. (1991). Chimpanzee material culture: What are its limits and why? In R. A. Foley (Ed.), The Origins of human behaviour (pp. 13–24). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meignen, L. (1998). Le Paléolithique moyen au Levant sud et central: que nous apprennent les données recentes? In M. Otte (Ed.), Préhistoire d’Anatolie: Genèse de deux mondes/Anatolian Prehistory: At the crossroad of two worlds. Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de L’Université de Liège No. 85 (pp. 685–708). Liège: L’Université de Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meignen, L. (2000). Early Middle Paleolithic blade technology in Southwestern Asia. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 19, 158-168–170-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (1996). The Neanderthal legacy: An archaeological perspective from Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P., & Stringer, C. (1989). The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movius, H.L., Jr., (1944). Early Man and pleistocene stratigraphy in Southeastern and Eastern Asia. Peabody Museum, Cambridge.

  • Movius, H.L., Jr., (1948). The lower paleolithic cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (n.s.) 38.

  • Neuville, R. (1934). Le Préhistorique de Palestine. Revue Biblique, 43, 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, C. J., & Jin, J. J. H. (2009). The evolution of modern human behavior in East Asia: Current perspectives. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. H. (1988). Addressing prehistoric hunting practices through stone tool analysis. American Anthropologist, 90, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, W. A., & Kelly, R. L. (1987). Expedient core technology and sedentism. In J. K. Johnson & C. A. Morrow (Eds.), The organization of core technology (pp. 285–304). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (1991). Sur une recherche technique expérimentale des techniques de débitage laminar et quelques résultats, Archéologie expérimentale. Tome 2: La Terre. L’os et pierre, la maison et les champs. Paris: Editions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrot, J. (1968). La Préhistoire Palestinienne. Supplément au dictionnaire de la Bible, Tome VIII, No. 43. Paris: Letouzey et Ane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, R. (1998). Variability selection and hominid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasic, J., & Andrefsky, W., Jr. (2001). Alaskan blade cores as specialized components of mobile toolkits: Assessing design parameters and toolkit organization through debitage analysis. In W. Andrefsky Jr. (Ed.), Lithic debitage: Context, form, meaning (pp. 61–79). Salt Lake City: Unversity of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D. A. (1981). The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. A. (1997). Lithics after the Stone Age: A handbook of stone tools from the Levant. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, Y. M., & Ebeling, J. R. (2008). New approaches to old stones: Recent studies of ground stone artifacts. Sheffield: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (2011). Studying technological change: A behavioral approach. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, G. (2007). Acheulian large flake industries: Technology, chronology, and significance (Vol. Series 1701). Oxford: Archaeopress: British Archaeological Reports International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, G. (2009). Acheulian giant core technology: A worldwide perspective. Current Anthropology, 50, 335–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1995). Behavioral factors affecting the production of Levallois Points in the Levantine Mousterian. In H. L. Dibble & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology (pp. 279–292). Madison: Prehistory Press Monographs. World Archaeology No. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1998). Neandertal and early modern human behavioral variability: A regional-scale approach to the lithic evidence for hunting in the Levantine Mousterian. Current Anthropology, 39, S45–S78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2008a). The Middle Stone Age archaeology of the Lower Omo Valley Kibish Formation: Excavations, lithic assemblages, and inferred patterns of early Homo sapiens behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 448–485. Special Issue: Paleoanthropology of the Kibish Formation, Southern Ethiopia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2008b). Transitions or turnovers? Climatically-forced extinctions of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals in the East Mediterranean Levant. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27, 2253–2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2010a). Stone Age visiting cards revisited: A strategic perspective on the lithic technology of early hominin dispersal. In J. G. Fleagle, J. J. Shea, F. E. Grine, A. L. Baden, & R. E. Leakey (Eds.), Out of Africa 1: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia (pp. 47–64). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. S. (2010b). Stone Age visiting cards revisited: A strategic perspective on the lithic technology of early hominin dispersal. In J. G. Fleagle, J. J. Shea, F. E. Grine, A. L. Baden, & R. Leakey (Eds.), Out of Africa 1: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia (pp. 47–64). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2011a). Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: Behavioral variability vs. “behavioral modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2011b). Refuting a myth of human origins. American Scientist, 99, 128–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2011c). Stone tool analysis and human evolution: Some advice from Uncle Screwtape. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J., & Bar-Yosef, O. (1999). Lithic assemblages from the New (1988–1994) excavations at ‘Ubeidiya: A preliminary report. Mitekufat HaEven (Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society), 28, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). Mousterian. In I. Tattersall, E. Delson, J. Van Couvering, & A. S. Brooks (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory (pp. 453–460). New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1999). On bipolar reduction and splintered pieces. North American Archaeologist, 20, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidrys, R. V. (1976). Classic Maya obsidian trade. American Antiquity, 41, 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. H. (2007). The Neolithic revolution in the Near East: Transforming the human landscape. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollberger, J. B., & Patterson, L. W. (1976). Prismatic blade replication. American Antiquity, 41, 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearcy, M. T. (2011). Life-giving stone: Ethnoarchaeology of Maya Metates. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surovell, T. A. (2009). Toward a behavioral ecology of lithic technology: Cases from Paleoindian archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchernov, E. (1999). The earliest hominids in the southern Levant. In J. Gilbert, F. Sánchez, L. Gilbert, & F. Ribot (Eds.), Los Homínidos y su entorno en el Pleistoceno inferior y medio de Eurasia: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Palaeontology, Orce, Spain, 1995 (pp. 389–406). Orce: Museo de Prehistoria y Paleontologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, N. B. (1941). The hand axe used in the Western Desert of Australia. Mankind, 3, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J. M., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of hominid behavior: Primate models (pp. 183–237). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrence, R. (1983). Time-Budgeting and Hunter-Gatherer Technology. In G. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective (pp. 11–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrence, R. (1989). Re-tooling: Towards a behavioral theory of stone tools. In R. Torrence (Ed.), Time, energy, and stone tools (pp. 57–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrence, R. (2002). Thinking big about small tools. In R. G. Elston & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Thinking small: Global perspectives on microlithization (pp. 179–190). Washington: American Anthropological Association (Archaeological Paper No. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostevin, G. B. (2007). Social intimacy, artefact visibility and acculturation models of Neanderthal–modern human interaction. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution (pp. 341–358). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, N. P. (1997). The artifact assemblages in the light of experimental studies. In G. Isaac & ab. B. Isaac (Eds.), Koobi Fora Research Project Series, Volume 5: Plio-Pleistocene archaeology (pp. 363–402). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, N., Clark, J. D., & Ligabue, G. (1992). The last stone axe makers. Scientific American, 263, 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, N., Schick, K. D., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Sevcik, R., & Rumbaugh, D. (1993). Pan the tool-maker: Investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using abilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (2006). A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Peer, P. (1998). The Nile Corridor and the out-of-Africa model: An examination of the archaeological record. Current Anthropology, 39(Supplement), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, L., & Mohapi, M. (2008). A Segment is not a Monolith: Evidence from the Howiesons Poort of Sibudu, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2594–2605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. J., & Shea, J. J. (2006). Mobility patterns and core technologies in the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1293–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmsen, E. N. (1968). Functional analysis of flaked stone artifacts. American Anthropologist, 33, 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B. (2001). The behavioural ecology of hunter-gatherers. In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 12–38). Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. I. (1992). A classification system for ground stone tools from the prehistoric Levant. Paléorient, 18, 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. I. (1994). Ground-stone tools and hunter-gatherer subsistence in Southwest Asia: Implications for the transition to farming. American Antiquity, 59, 238–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T. (1995). Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeology, 27, 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For their comments on an earlier draft of this paper, I thank Metin Eren, George Odell, and one anonymous reviewer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Shea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shea, J.J. Lithic Modes A–I: A New Framework for Describing Global-Scale Variation in Stone Tool Technology Illustrated with Evidence from the East Mediterranean Levant. J Archaeol Method Theory 20, 151–186 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9128-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9128-5

Keywords

Navigation