Skip to main content
Log in

Fluctuation of “sperm DNA integrity” in accordance with semen parameters, and it’s relationship with infertility

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays sperm analysis is used routinely to assess infertile men, but it’s predictive value is still restricted. For this reason, new markers are needed for diagnosis and guide treatment. A DNA damage evaluation method, which is easily applicable for routine analysis is described in this paper to provide an important support in clinical evaluation.

Methods

In this study, DNA damage evaluation was planned in infertile males with the COMET assay, a method which is simple, cheap, sensitive and reliable. For this purpose, the sperm DNA damage of normospermic, oligospermic, asthenospermic and teratospermic cases were investigated and the relationship between sperm parameters (sperm count, motility, morphology) and DNA damage was assessed.

Results and conclusion

According to our results we suggest that the factors to blame for sperm DNA damage and semen quality are the same. Also it was found that the infertile males possess substantially more sperm DNA damage than fertile men do. Improving and using the DNA damage evaluation tests seem to improve the results in ART clinics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Unexplained male infertility: potential causes and management. Hum Androl. 2011;1:2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:331–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avendano C, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation in morphologically normal spermatozoa: how much should we be concerned in the ICSI era? J Androl. 2011;32:356–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avendano C, Franchi C, Duran H, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:549–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meseguer M, Martinez-Conejero JA, O’Connor EJ, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Garrido N. The significance of sperm DNA oxidation in embryo development and reproductive in an oocyte donation program: a new model to study a male infertility prognostic factor. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodama H, Yamaguchi R, Fukuda J, Kasai H, Tanaka T. Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes MT. Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, infertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:674–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spano M, Bonde JP, Hjollund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, Leter G. The Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:43–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal A, Erenpreiss J, Sharma R. Sperm chromatin assessment. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive technologies. UK: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:990–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chohan KR, Griffin JT, Lafromboise M, De Jonge CJ, Carrell DT. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl. 2006;27:53–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Peiro A, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Abad C, Guitart SM, Amengual MJ, et al. Dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation in patients carrying structurally rearranged chromosomes. Int J Androl. 2011;34:e546–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Peiro A, Fernandez-Encinas A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Prada E et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: tunel assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral comet assay. Andrology 2013;1–8.

  16. Irvine DS, Twigg JP, Gordon EL, Fulton N, Milne PA, Aitken RJ. DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl. 2000;21:33–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao W, McNutt MA, Zhu WG. The comet assay: a sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells. Methods. 2009;48:46–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simon L, Lutton D, McManus J, Lewis SEM. Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:652–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Irvine DS, Twigg JP, Gordon EL, Fulton N, Milne PA, Aitken RJ. DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl. 2000;21:33–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. VJ M-M, Green MH, Schmezer P, Pool-Zobel BL, DeMeo MP, Collins A. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review. Mutat Res. 1993;288:47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes CM, Lewis SEM, McKelvey-Martin VJ, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;2:613–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Alvarez JG, et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Evenson DP, Wixon R. Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology. 2006;65:979–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sergerie M, Laforest G, Bujan L, Bissonnette F, Bleau G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3446–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kodama H, Yamaguchi R, Fukuda J, Kasai H, Tanaka T. Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen HM, Chia SE, Ong CN. Evaluation of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with male infertility. J Androl. 1999;20:718–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oosterhuis GJE, Mulder AB, Kalsbeek-Batenburg E, Lambalk CB, Schoemaker J, Vermes I. Measuring apoptosis in human spermatozoa: a biological assay for semen quality? Fertil Steril. 2000;74:245–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Benchaib M, Braun V, Lornage J, Hadj S, Salle B, Lejeune H, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1023–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:602–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trisini AT, Singh NP, Duty SM, Hauser R. Relationship between human semen parameters and deoxyribonucleic acid damage assessed by the neutral comet assay. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:1623–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Peiro A, Fernandez-Encinas A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Prada E, et al. Alkaline and neutral comet assay profiles of sperm DNA damage in clinical groups. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:652–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşen Durmaz.

Additional information

Capsule An accurate sperm DNA damage analysis provides an important support in clinical evaluation so it is highly recommended before assisted reproductive technologies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durmaz, A., Dikmen, N., Gündüz, C. et al. Fluctuation of “sperm DNA integrity” in accordance with semen parameters, and it’s relationship with infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 31, 1665–1671 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0364-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0364-3

Keywords

Navigation