Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of harvesting on biomass production and nutrient removal in phototrophic biofilm reactors for effluent polishing

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of wastewater treatment plants require post-treatment to remove residual nitrogen and phosphorus. This study investigated various harvesting regimes that would achieve consistent low effluent concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in a phototrophic biofilm reactor. Experiments were performed in a vertical biofilm reactor under continuous artificial lighting and employing artificial wastewater. Under similar conditions, experiments were performed in near-horizontal flow lanes with biofilms of variable thickness. It was possible to maintain low nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in the effluent of the vertical biofilm reactor by regularly harvesting half of the biofilm. The average areal biomass production rate achieved a 7 g dry weight m−2 day−1 for all different harvesting frequencies tested (every 2, 4, or 7 days), corresponding to the different biofilm thicknesses. Apparently, the biomass productivity is similar for a wide range of biofilm thicknesses. The biofilm could not be maintained for more than 2 weeks as, after this period, it spontaneously detached from the carrier material. Contrary to the expectations, the biomass production doubled when the biofilm thickness was increased from 130 μm to 2 mm. This increased production was explained by the lower density and looser structure of the 2 mm biofilm. It was concluded that, concerning biomass production and labor requirement, the optimum harvesting frequency is once per week.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen RA (ed) (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA

  • Biggs BJF (1996) Patterns in benthic algae of streams. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press Elsevier, London, pp 31–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop PL, Zhang TC, Fu YC (1995) Effects of biofilm structure, microbial distributions and mass transport on biodegradation processes. Water Sci Technol 31:143–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blier R, Laliberte G, de la Nou J (1995) Tertiary treatment of cheese factory anaerobic effluent with Phormidium bohneri and Micractinum pusillum. Bioresour Technol 52:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelee NC, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman CJN, Wijffels RH (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater effluent using microalgal biofilms. Water Res 45:5925–5933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boelee NC, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman CJN, Wijffels RH (2012) Scenario analysis of nutrient removal from municipal wastewater by microalgal biofilms. Water 4:460–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg M, Gaedke U, Boehrer B, Spijkerman E (2012) Complementary ecophysiological strategies combine to facilitate survival in the hostile conditions of a deep chlorophyll maximum. Oecologia 169:609–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Beer D, Stoodley P, Roe F, Lewandowski Z (1994) Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:1131–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duboc P, Marison I, Uv S (1999) Quantitative calorimetry and biochemical engineering. In: Kemp RB (ed) Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 287–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood NTW, Di Pippo F, Albertano P (2011) Phosphatase activities of cultured phototrophic biofilms. Water Res 46:378–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto N, Sudo R (1997) Nutrient-limited growth of Microcystis aeruginosa and Phormidium tenue and competition under various N:P supply ratios and temperatures. Limnol Oceanogr 42:250–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Godos I, González C, Becares E, García-Encina P, Muñoz R (2009) Simultaneous nutrients and carbon removal during pretreated swine slurry degradation in a tubular biofilm photobioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biot 82:187–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González C, Marciniak J, Villaverde S, León C, García PA, Munoz R (2008) Efficient nutrient removal from swine manure in a tubular biofilm photo-bioreactor using algae-bacteria consortia. Water Sci Technol 58:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzon A, Bohn A, Diociaiuti M, Albertano P (2008) Cultured phototrophic biofilms for phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment. Water Res 42:4357–4367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Healey FP (1973) Inorganic nutrient uptake and deficiency in algae. Crit Rev Microbiol 3:69–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecky RE, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:796–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill W (1996) Effects of light. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press Elsevier, London, pp 121–148

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn RC, Ray AD (1973) Effects of thickness on bacterial film. J Water Pollut Control Fed 45:2302–2320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MB, Wen Z (2009) Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:525–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Tuchman NC, Peterson CG (1997) Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliphuis AMJ, de Winter L, Vejrazka C, Martens DE, Janssen M, Wijffels RH (2010) Photosynthetic efficiency of Chlorella sorokiniana in a turbulently mixed short light-path photobioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 26:687–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YH, Leu JY, Lan CR, Lin PHP, Chang FL (2003) Kinetics of inorganic carbon utilization by microalgal biofilm in a flat plate photoreactor. Chemosphere 53(7):779–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SM, Zhang J, Jiang WS (2003) Pore water nutrient regeneration in Shallow Coastal Bohai Sea, China. J Oceanogr 59:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons WB, Loder TC, Murray SM (1982) Nutrient Pore water chemistry, Great Bay, New Hampshire: Benthic fluxes. Estuaries 5:230–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy TE, Berberoğlu H (2012) Temperature fluctuation and evaporative loss rate in an algae biofilm photobioreactor. J Sol Energ-T ASME 134:011002.1–011002.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita M, Watanabe Y, Saiki H (2000) High photosynthetic productivity of green microalga Chlorella sorokiniana. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 87:203–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norsker N-H, Barbosa MJ, Vermuë MH, Wijffels RH (2011) Microalgal production—a close look at the economics. Biotechnol Adv 29:24–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan A, Kinney K, Katz L, Berberoglu H (2012) Reduction of water and energy requirement of algae cultivation using an algae biofilm photobioreactor. Bioresour Technol 114:542–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posadas E, García-Encina P-A, Soltau A, Domínguez A, Díaz I, Muñoz R (2013) Carbon and nutrient removal from centrates and domestic wastewater using algal–bacterial biofilm bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 139:50–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht M (2005) Modeling biofilm and floc diffusion processes based on analytical solution of reaction–diffusion equations. Water Res 39:1311–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Guasch H, Romaní A, Muñoz I (2002) The effect of biological factors on the efficiency of river biofilms in improving water quality. Hydrobiologia 469:149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satoh H, Ono H, Rulin B, Kamo J, Okabe S, Fukushi K-I (2004) Macroscale and microscale analyses of nitrification and denitrification in biofilms attached on membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Water Res 38:1633–1641

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekar R, Nair KVK, Rao VNR, Venugopalan VP (2002) Nutrient dynamics and successional changes in a lentic freshwater biofilm. Freshwat Biol 47:1893–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD, McIntire CD (1987) Effects of irradiance on the community structure and biomass of algal assemblages in laboratory streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:1640–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart PS (1997) A review of experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot P, Thebault JM, Dauta A, de la Noue J (1991) A comparative study and mathematical modeling of temperature, light and growth of three microalgae potentially useful for wastewater treatment. Water Res 25:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vooren L, Lessard P, Ottoy JP, Vanrolleghem PA (1999) pH Buffer capacity based monitoring of algal wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 20:547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vejrazka C, Janssen M, Streefland M, Wijffels RH (2011) Photosynthetic efficiency of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in flashing light. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2905–2913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wäsche S, Horn H, Hempela DC (2002) Influence of growth conditions on biofilm development and mass transfer at the bulk/biofilm interface. Water Res 36:4775–4784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf G, Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Kinetic modeling of phototrophic biofilms: The PHOBIA model. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:1064–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Zippel B, Neu TR (2005) Growth and structure of phototrophic biofilms under controlled light conditions. Water Sci Technol 52:203–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was performed in the TTIW-cooperation framework of Wetsus, center of excellence for sustainable water technology (http://www.wetsus.nl). Wetsus is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, the European Union Regional Development Fund, the Province of Fryslân, the City of Leeuwarden, and the EZ/Kompas program of the “Samenwerkingsverband Noord-Nederland”. The authors like to thank the participants of the research theme “Advanced waste water treatment” and the steering committee of STOWA for the fruitful discussions and their financial support, and K. Sukacova for the taxonomical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. C. Boelee.

Appendices

Appendix

$$ {{\mathrm{Penetration}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{NO}}_3}^{\hbox{--} }{{,\mathrm{PO}}_4}^{3\hbox{--} }{{,\mathrm{and}\ \mathrm{HCO}}_3}^{\hbox{--} } $$

The algal growth on NO3 -, PO4 3-, and CO2 can be described by a stoichiometrical reaction equation. With the measured elemental composition of the biomass, this equation is as follows:

$$ 1\ {\mathrm{CO}}_2+0.15\ {{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{O}}_3}^{\hbox{--} }+0.008\ {{\mathrm{P}\mathrm{O}}_4}^{3\hbox{--} }+0.0036\ {{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}_4}^{2\hbox{--} }+0.98\ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to {\mathrm{CH}}_{1.77}{\mathrm{O}}_{0.59}{\mathrm{N}}_{0.15}{\mathrm{P}}_{0.008}{\mathrm{S}}_{0.0036}+1.35\ {\mathrm{O}}_2+0.18\ {\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{\hbox{--} } $$

From this stoichiometrical growth equation, the yield of the different components can be calculated. The biomass content and the yields are shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Parameters for calculating the penetration depth of NO3 , PO43−, and HCO3 in the biofilm and parameters for calculating the light intensity at the penetration depths
Fig. 10
figure 10

The normalized spectral distribution of the PAR photons (En,PAR,λ 400-700 nm) of the Phillips Master PL-L

Fig. 11
figure 11

The specific absorption coefficient (aλ) for Chlorella sorokiniana

The penetration depths of NO3 , PO4 3–, and HCO3 are calculated according to the following formula as described for instance in Perez et al. (2005):

$$ {L}_{p,i}=\sqrt{\frac{2\cdot {D}_i\cdot {C}_{i,l/b}}{\frac{\mu_{\max }}{Y_i}\cdot {C}_x}}\left[\mathrm{m}\right] $$

with L pi the penetration depth of nutrient i (meters), D i the diffusion coefficient of nutrient i (square meters per second), C i,l / b the concentration of nutrient i at the liquid–biofilm interface (grams per cubic meter), μmax the maximum specific growth rate (per second), Y i the yield of biomass on nutrient i (gram biomass per gram nutrient i), and C x the algae concentration (gram per cubic meter).

Table 6 shows the parameters that were used for the calculation. For the concentrations at the biofilm surface, it was assumed no mass transfer limitation occurred at the liquid–biofilm interface.

Penetration of light

The following formula was used to calculate the light intensity at depth z inside the biofilm:

$$ \mathrm{PFD}(z)={\displaystyle \sum_{\lambda =400}^{\lambda =700}\left({\mathrm{PFD}}_{\mathrm{in}}\cdot {E}_{n,\mathrm{PAR},\lambda}\cdot {e}^{-{a}_{\lambda}\cdot {C}_x\cdot z\cdot d}\cdot \varDelta \lambda \right)\left[\upmu \mathrm{mol}{\mathrm{m}}^{\hbox{-} 2}{\mathrm{s}}^{\hbox{-} 1}\right]} $$

with PFDin the photon flux density of the incoming light (picomoles per square meter per second), E n,PARλ the normalized spectral distribution of the PAR photons (400–700 nm nm–1), a λ the specific absorption coefficient (square meters per gram), C x the algae concentration (grams per cubic meter), z the biofilm depth (meters), d a light-path enhancement factor (−), and ∆λ the wavelength interval (nanometers).

Table 6 shows the parameters that were used for this calculation. To obtain the E n,PAR,λ for the Phillips Master PL-L lamps for the experiments, the spectral photon flux density was measured using a fiber-optic CCD-based spectroradiometer (AvaSpec-2048 detector, Fiber FC-IR100-1-ME, Avantes, Eerbeek, The Netherlands) at 1-nm intervals (for details on the measurement protocol, see Vejrazka et al. (2011)). This measurement was normalized for the PAR range to obtain the normalized emission spectrum according to the following equation:

$$ {E}_{n,\mathrm{PAR},\lambda }=\frac{{\mathrm{PFD}}_{\lambda }}{\mathrm{PFD}}\left[{\mathrm{nm}}^{-1}\right] $$

with PFDλ the spectral photon flux density (micromoles per square meter per second per nanometer) and PFD, the photon flux density in the PAR range(400–700 nm, micromoles per square meter per second ). Figure 10 shows E n,PAR,λ of the Phillips Master PL-L lamps. The aλ used for phototrophs adapted to high light conditions (top layer of the biofilm) was the aλ measured for Chlorella sorokiniana shown in Fig. 11 (for details on the cultivation see Kliphuis et al. (2010) and for details of the measurement protocol see Vejrazka et al. (2011)). In order to simulate low light adapted phototrophs this aλ was multiplied with a factor 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boelee, N.C., Janssen, M., Temmink, H. et al. The effect of harvesting on biomass production and nutrient removal in phototrophic biofilm reactors for effluent polishing. J Appl Phycol 26, 1439–1452 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0178-1

Keywords

Navigation