Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintaining Trust and Credibility in a Continuously Evolving Organic Food System

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

To me it is essential that organic farming maintains its credibility. If you start wrapping organic products into a layer of spurious stories, without a basis in reality, then I think it might eventually damage the credibility of organics. (Danish organic producer quoted in trade journal)

Abstract

Credibility is particularly important in organic food systems because there are only marginal visual and sensorial differences between organic and conventionally produced products, requiring consumers to trust in producers’ quality claims. In this article I explore what challenges the credibility of organic food systems and I explore how credibility of organic food systems can be maintained, using the Danish organic food system as a case study. The question is increasingly relevant as the sale of organic food is growing in Denmark as well as globally, and consumers’ expectations of organics continuously evolve. The inquiry is threefold, first I outline a conceptual framework for understanding trust and credibility in the food system, secondly I explore the developments in Danish organic food systems and thirdly discuss the challenges and opportunities for maintaining trust in the Danish organic food system. In the analysis I indicate eight key challenges: (1) unrealistic expectations, (2) blind trust and little motivation for extending their knowledge, (3) consumers assess the overall credibility of organic products, (4) ambitious ethical principles, (5) new consumer groups introduce new expectations, (6) frozen requirements in a changing world, (7) growing imports and labelling and (8) multiple versions of organics and the diversity is growing, as well as four aspects which may maintain the credibility of organics if implemented: (1) coordinate expectations, (2) communicate requested information, (3) institutional reform and (4) open communication of pros and cons of organic production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Associations of organic producers and consumers, known in Denmark as “Økologiens Hus” until 2002 later reorganised as “Økologisk Landsforening”.

  2. The red Ø-label, which is still in use today.

References

  • Aarset, B., Beckmann, S., Bigne, E., Beveridge, M., Bjorndal, T., Bunting, J., et al. (2004). The European consumers’ understanding and perceptions of the “organic” food regime: The case of aquaculture. British Food Journal, 106(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelaar, T., Bouwman, H., & Steinfield, C. (2004). Enhancing customer value through click-and-mortar e-commerce: Implications for geographical market reach and customer type. Telematics and Informatics, 21(2), 167–182. doi:10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00055-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140–1167. doi:10.1108/00070700910992961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe, H. F., & Halberg, N. (Eds.). (2008). Udvikling, vækst og integritet i den danske økologisektor. Vidensyntese om muligheder og barrierer for fortsat udvikling og markedsbaseret vækst i produktion, forarbejdning og omsætning af økologiske produkter (ICROFS-rapport). Foulum: Internationalt Center for Forskning i Økologisk Jordbrug og Fødevaresystemer (ICROFS).

  • Alrøe, H. F., & Kristensen, E. S. (2004). Why have basic principles for organic agriculture?… and what kind of principles should they be? Ecology and Farming, 36, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. H. (2011). From organic consumers to organic consumption—Organic consumption, everyday complexity and the social dynamics of food provisioning. Copenhagen: Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. H., & Hjelmar, U. (2011). Økologi og kompleksitet i de daglige madindkøb. In G. Tveit, & P. Sandøe (Eds.), Økologiske fødevarer-hvor bevæger forbrugerne sig hen? (pp. 79–90). Copenhagen: Center for Bioetik og Risikovurdering, University of Copenhagen.

  • Andersen, L. M., & Lund, T. B. (2011). Udviklingen i det økologiske forbrug. In G. Tveit, & P. Sandøe (Eds.), Økologiske fødevarer-hvor bevæger forbrugerne sig hen? (pp. 29–46). Frederiksberg: Center for Bioetik og Risikovurdering.

  • Årstiderne. (2014). Årstiderne web page. http://www.aarstiderne.com. Accessed June 26, 2014.

  • Berg, L., Kjaernes, U., Ganskau, E., Minina, V., Voltchkova, L., Halkier, B., et al. (2005). Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway. European Societies, 7(1), 103–129. doi:10.1080/1461669042000327045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bildtgård, T. (2008). Trust in food in modern and late-modern societies. Social Science Information, 47(1), 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, N. K. (2008). Gulerodshippier & gummistøvlesocialister : Historien om den økologiske bevægelse i Danmark 1970 til 2001. Auning: Landbohistorisk Selskab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brom, F. W. A. (2000). Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (2009). Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(4), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (2013). Financialization in agri-food supply chains: Private equity and the transformation of the retail sector. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(2), 247–258. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9413-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology-Baton Rouge-, 69, 321–346.

  • Christensen, T., Olsen, S. B., Kærgård, N., & Dubgaard, A. (2014). Dokumentation af MultiTrust spørgeskema om økologisk forbrug. Institut for fødevare- og ressourceøkonomi—Københavns Universitet.

  • Cook, G., Reed, M., & Twiner, A. (2009). “But it’s all true!”: Commercialism and commitment in the discourse of organic food promotion. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 29(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAFC. (2010). http://www.lf.dk/For_medlemmer/Sektioner_og_Udvalg/Oekologisektionen/11_bud.aspx. Accessed February 11, 2015.

  • Darnhofer, I., Lindenthal, T., Bartel-Kratochvil, R., & Zollitsch, W. (2010). Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugbjerg, C., & Halpin, D. (2010). generating policy capacity in emerging green industries: The development of organic farming in Denmark and Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugbjerg, C., Smed, S., Andersen, L. M., & Schvartzman, Y. (2014). Improving eco-labelling as an environmental policy instrument: Knowledge, trust and organic consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(4), 559–575. doi:10.1080/1523908x.2013.879038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge, J., van Trijp, J. C. M., van der Lans, I. A., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2008). How trust in institutions and organizations builds general consumer confidence in the safety of food: A decomposition of effects. Appetite, 51(2), 311–317. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denver, S., & Christensen, T. (2011). Hvordan opfatter forbrugeren økologi? In G. Tveit, & P. Sandøe (Eds.), Økologiske fødevarer-hvor bevæger forbrugerne sig hen? (pp. 49–61). Frederiksberg: Center for Bioetik og Risikovurdering.

  • DST. (2015). Statistics Denmark. http://www.statistikbanken.dk/OEKO3. Accessed March 24, 2015.

  • DuPuis, E. M., & Gillon, S. (2009). Alternative modes of governance: Organic as civic engagement. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(1–2), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S., Bear, C., & Walker, G. (2008). Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagan, R. (2007). The place of food: Mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems. Progress in Human Geography, 31(1), 23–42. doi:10.1177/0309132507073527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkier, B., Holm, L., Domingues, M., Magaudda, P., Nielsen, A., & Terragni, L. (2007). Trusting, complex, quality conscious or unprotected? Constructing the food consumer in different European national contexts. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(3), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M. K., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindborg, H. (2008). Aktøranalyse—samspillet med dagligvarehandlen. In H. Alrøe & N. Halberg (Eds.), Udvikling, vækst og integritet i den danskeøkologisektor (pp. 341–358). Foulum: ICROFS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C. (2000). Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmar, U. (2011). Consumers’ purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices. Appetite, 56(2), 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff-Clausen, E. (2008). Online ethos: Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J., & Stauning, I. (2002). Ecological modernisation and ‘our daily bread’. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM. (2009). The principles of organic agriculture. http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.html. Accessed March 12, 2014.

  • Ingemann, J. H. (2009). Hvorfor vælger forbrugerne økologisk? Økologi og Erhverv, 443.

  • Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. O. D., Lund, T. B., Andersen, L. M., Christensen, V. T., Krarup, S., Christensen, T., et al. (2008). Hvorfor køber forbrugerne økologi? In H. F. Alrøe & N. Halberg (Eds.), Udvikling, vækst og integritet i den danske økologisektor: vidensyntese om muligheder og barrierer for fortsat udvikling og markedsbaseret vækst i produktion, forarbejdning og omsætning af økologiske produkter (pp. 91–130). Foulum: ICROFS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, J. (2006). The interpersonal world of direct marketing: Examining conventions of quality at UK farmers’ markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U. (2006). Trust and distrust: Cognitive decisions or social relations? Journal of Risk Research, 9(8), 911–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., Warde, A., Lavik, R., & Harvey, M. (2005). Trust and the institutionalisation of food consumption. In Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the European Sociological Association, Working Group of the Sociology of Consumption, Torun, Poland, 9–12 September 2005.

  • Kjeldsen, C., & Ingemann, J. H. (2009). From the social to the economic and beyond? A relational approach to the historical development of Danish organic food networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(2), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kledal, P. R., & Halberg, N. (2012). Økologisk forskning og udvikling gennem 15 år. International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems (ICROFS).

  • Knudsen, M. (2001). Krop og Suverænitet—om to måder at skabe tillid på. In A. Bordum, & S. B. Wenneberg (Eds.), Det handler om tillid (Vol. Det handler om tillid, pp. 15–23). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.

  • Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

  • Lamine, C. (2005). Settling shared uncertainties: Local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4), 324–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00308.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C. S. (2006). Italesættelser af økologisk mad. Dissertation for a Ph.D., Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985. doi:10.1093/sf/63.4.967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, T. B., Andersen, L. M., & O’Doherty Jensen, K. (2013). The emergence of diverse organic consumers: Does a mature market undermine the search for alternative products? Sociologia Ruralis, 53(4), 454–478. doi:10.1111/soru.12022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, T. B., Jensen, K. O. D., & Andersen, L. M. (2011). Økologiske forbrugere i Danmark—hvem er de? In G. Tveit, & P. Sandøe (Eds.), Økologiske fødevarer-hvor bevæger forbrugerne sig hen? (pp. 13–26). Frederiksberg: Center for Bioetik og Risikovurdering.

  • Lundby, K. (2009). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttikholt, L. W. (2007). Principles of organic agriculture as formulated by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijboom, F. (2008). Problems of trust: A question of trustworthiness: An ethical inquiry of trust and trustworthiness in the context of the agricultural and food sector. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Meijboom, F., Visak, T., & Brom, F. (2006). From trust to trustworthiness: Why information is not enough in the food sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(5), 427–442. doi:10.1007/s10806-006-9000-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. B., Coveney, J., Henderson, J., Ward, P. R., & Taylor, A. W. (2012). Reconnecting Australian consumers and producers: Identifying problems of distrust. Food Policy, 37(6), 634–640. doi:10.1016/2012.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milestad, R., Bartel-Kratochvil, R., Leitner, H., & Axmann, P. (2010). Being close: The quality of social relationships in a local organic cereal and bread network in Lower Austria. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(3), 228–240. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministers, N. C. O. (2012). http://nynordiskmad.org. Accessed August 21, 2012.

  • Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420. doi:10.1177/s0038038501000190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, P. (2012). Growing local food: Scale and local food systems governance. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(1), 107–121. doi:10.1007/s10460-011-9331-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naspetti, S., & Zanoli, R. (2009). Organic food quality and safety perception throughout Europe. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 15(3), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, E. (2008). Drivkræfter og barrierer for omlægning til økologisk jordbrug set ud fra et sociologisk perspektiv. In H. F. Alrøe, & N. Halberg (Eds.), Udvikling, Vækst og Integritet i den danske økologisektor: Vidensyntese om muligheder og barrierer for fortsat udvikling og markedsbaseret vækst i produktion, forarbejdning og omsætning af økologiske produkter. Foulum: International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems (ICROFS).

  • Økodag. (2014). Økodag. http://okodag.dk. Accessed February 02, 2015.

  • ØL. (2014). Økologisk Markedsnotat: juni 2014. Aarhus: Økologisk Landsforening.

  • Poppe, C., & Kjærnes, U. (2003). Trust in food in Europe: A comparative analysis. Professional report no. 5. Oslo: The National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO).

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35(3), 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, C. (2003). Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schösler, H., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. (2013). The organic food philosophy: A qualitative exploration of the practices, values, and beliefs of Dutch organic consumers within a cultural-historical frame. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(2), 439–460. doi:10.1007/s10806-012-9392-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schvartzman, Y. (2012). Metastyring af markedsudvikling: Policystrategier og netværkskoordinering i udvikling af nye markeder. Et komparativt studie af udviklingen af det danske og det svenske økologimarkeder. PhD, Aarhus University.

  • Simmel, G. (1991). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smed, S. (2011). Forbrug af økologisk frugt og grønt. In G. Tveit, & P. Sandøe (Eds.), Økologiske fødevarer-hvor bevæger forbrugerne sig hen? (pp. 63–76). Frederiksberg: Center for Bioetik og Risikovurdering.

  • Smed, S., Andersen, L. M., Kærgård, N., & Daugbjerg, C. (2013). A matter of trust: How trust influence organic consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sønderskov, K. M., & Daugbjerg, C. (2011). The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: Organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(4), 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tersbøl, M. (2012). Climate strategy for organic farming: The goals, focus areas and means needed for a better protection of the climate through organic farming. Aarhus: Organic Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsøe, M., Alrøe, H. F., & Noe, E. (2014). Observing the observers: Uncovering the role of values in research assessments of organic food systems. Ecology and Society,. doi:10.5751/es-06347-190246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsøe, M., & Kjeldsen, C. (2015). The constitution of trust: Function, configuration and generation of trust in alternative food networks. Sociologia Ruralis.

  • Thorsøe, M., & Noe, E. (2015). Cultivating market relations—Diversification in the Danish organic production sector following market expansion. Sociologia Ruralis.

  • Thorsøe, M., Povlsen, K. K., & Christensen, T. (2015). Organics are good, but we don’t know exactly what the term means—Trust and knowledge in organic consumption. Food, Culture and Society.

  • Torjusen, H., Sangstad, L., Jensen, K. O. D., & Kjærnes, U. (2004). European consumers’ conceptions of organic food: A review of available research. Professional report no. 4-2004. Oslo: Statens Institut for Forbruksforskning (SIFO).

  • Trydeman, K. M. (2011). Environmental assessment of imported organic products: Focusing on orange juice from Brazil and soybeans from China: PhD thesis. Copenhagen: Department of Agriculture and Ecology, University of Copenhagen.

  • Verbeke, W. (2005). Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 347–368. doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (2014). The world of organic agriculture—Statistics and emerging trends 2014. FiBL-IFOAM Report. Frick, Sch: FiBL and IFOAM.

  • Zagata, L., & Lostak, M. (2012). In goodness we trust. The role of trust and institutions underpinning trust in the organic food market. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 470–487. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00574.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the MultiTrust project, part of the Organic Research, Development and Demonstration programme, which is coordinated by the International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems (ICROFS). It is funded by The Danish AgriFish Agency, an agency of the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. Furthermore, the author wishes to thank Dr. Hugo Alrøe for ideas, suggestions and debates, which have assisted in the development of the arguments presented in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsøe, M.H. Maintaining Trust and Credibility in a Continuously Evolving Organic Food System. J Agric Environ Ethics 28, 767–787 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9559-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9559-6

Keywords

Navigation