Abstract
In this paper I critique two popular, non-scientific attitudes toward genetically engineered foods. In doing so, I will be employing the concepts of ambiguity, purity/impurity, control/resistance, and unity/diversity as developed by Latina feminist metaphysicians. I begin by casting a critical eye toward a specific anti-biotech account of transgenic food crops, an account that I will argue relies on an anti-feminist metaphysics. I then cast that same critical eye toward a specific pro-biotech account, arguing that it also relies on such an anti-feminist metaphysics. I will argue further that this metaphysics yields a less accurate account of genetics. I end by arguing that if we adopt a Latina feminist metaphysics we can more accurately understand plants, genetics, and genetic engineering.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcoff, L. M. (1995). Mestizo identity. In N. Zack (Ed.), American mixed race: The culture of microdiversity (pp. 257–278). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands/la frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
Avise, J. C. (2004). The hope, hype, and reality of genetic engineering: Remarkable stories from agriculture, industry, medicine, and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biotechnology Industry Organization. Biotechnology: A guide to technologies. (n.d.). Retrieved Sep 24, 2008, from http://www.bio.org/speeches/pubs/er/technology_collection.asp.
Biotechnology Industry Organization. Frequently asked questions on agricultural biotechnology. (n.d.). Retrieved Sep 24, 2008, from http://www.bio.org/foodag/faq.asp#1.
Bowring, F. (2003). Science, seeds and cyborgs: Biotechnology and the appropriation of life. London: Verso.
Commoner, B. (2003). Unraveling the DNA myth. Seedling, July, 6–12.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. New York: Routledge.
Finnegan, J., & McElroy, D. (1994). Transgene inactivation: Plants fight back!. Bio/Technology, 12, 883–888.
Frye, M. (2005). Categories in distress. In B. Andrew, J. Keller, & L. Schwartzman (Eds.), Feminist interventions in ethics and politics (pp. 41–58). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hain, M., Albrecht, J. A., & Golick, D. A. (2004). What is genetic engineering and how does it work? Retrieved Sep 24, 2008, from http://agbiosafety.unl.edu/basic_genetics.shtml.
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. (2003). Mentor’s kit. Retrieved Sep 24, 2008, from http://www.isaaa.org/Resources/presentationslides/mentorskit/default.html.
Keller, E. F. (2000). The Century of the gene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leiser, B. (2000). Is homosexuality unnatural? In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), The moral life (pp. 698–707). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lorde, A. (1984). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In Sister outsider (pp. 110–113). Berkeley: Crossing Press.
Lugones, M. (1994). Purity, impurity, and separation. Signs: journal of women in culture and society, 19, 275–296.
Maffie, J. (2000). ‹Like a painting, we will be erased; like a flower, we will dry up here on earth’ Ultimate reality and meaning according to Nahua philosophy in the age of conquest. Ultimate reality and meaning: interdisciplinary studies in the philosophy of understanding, 23, 295–318.
Mill, J. S. (1998). Three essays on religion. New York: Prometheus Books.
Monsanto. Biotech basics. (n.d.). Retrieved Sep 24, 2008, from http://www.monsanto.com/responsibility/youth/educationaloutreach/biotechbasics.asp.
Rissler, J., & Mellon, M. (1996). The ecological risks of engineered crops. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sagoff, M. (2003). Genetic engineering and the concept of the natural. In V. V. Gehring (Ed.), Genetic prospects: Essays on biotechnology, ethics, and public policy (pp. 11–25). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergin, L.A. Latina Feminist Metaphysics and Genetically Engineered Foods. J Agric Environ Ethics 22, 257–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9144-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9144-3