Abstract
The present study assessed business students’ responses to an innovative interactive presentation on academic integrity that employed quoted material from previous students as launching points for discussion. In total, 15 business classes (n = 412 students) including 2nd, 3rd and 4th year level students participated in the presentations as part of the ethics component of ongoing courses. Students’ perceptions of the importance of academic integrity, self-reports of cheating behaviors, and factors contributing to misconduct were examined along with perceptions about the presentation. Discussion sessions revealed that academic misconduct is a complex issue. For example, knowledge of what constitutes misconduct was not consistent across domains (e.g. exam contexts versus group work), penalties were not wholly known, and there was variation in perceived responsibility for reporting and representing academic integrity. Survey measures revealed that self-reported academic misconduct was more prevalent than expected with only 7.5% of students indicating they had never cheated in any way. Furthermore, results showed gender and year of study as predictive factors for issues related to academic misconduct. In general, students were receptive to this form of presentation. The implications of such instructional interventions for enhancing ethical behaviors in higher education classrooms are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Three students identified themselves as “other” indicating that they were in their 5th year but taking 4th year courses. These students were assigned to the 4th year group.
References
Abrami, P. C. (2001). Understanding and promoting complex learning using technology. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 113–136.
Allmon, D. E., Page, D., & Roberts, R. (2000). Determinants of perceptions of cheating: Ethical orientation, personality and demographics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 411–422.
Bean, D. F., & Bernardi, R. A. (2005). Accounting ethics courses: A professional necessity. CPA Journal, 75(12), 64–65.
Bertram Gallant, T., & Drinan, P. (2008). Toward a model of academic integrity institutionalization: Informing practice in postsecondary education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(2), 25–44.
Boehm, P. J., Justice, M., & Weeks, S. (2009). Promoting academic integrity in a higher education context. The Community College Enterprise, 15(1), 45–61.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Christensen Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 2, 1–21.
Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2008). Inoculating against pro-plagiarism justifications: Rational and affective strategies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(1), 98–119.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.
Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700.
Davis, S., Drinan, P., & Bertram Gallant, T. (2009). Cheating in School: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Delany, J. T., & Sockell, D. (1992). Do company ethics training programs make a difference? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 719–727.
Elzubier, M. A., & Rizk, D. E. (2003). Exploring perceptions and attitudes of senior medical students and interns on academic integrity. Medical Education, 37, 389–396.
Hughes, J. C., Christian, B., Dayman, J., Kaufman, D., & Schmidt, N. (2002). Understanding and reducing academic misconduct at the University of Guelph. A report and TSS Learning Commons Project prepared by the University of Guelph, November, 2002.
Kidwell, L. A., & Kent, J. (2008). Integrity at a distance: A study of academic misconduct among university students on and off campus. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17, S3–S16.
Kirkland, K. D. (2010). Academic honesty: Is what students believe different from what they do? Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 70, 32–93.
Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplation. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 381–394.
Lawson, R. A. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “real world”? Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189–199.
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: William Morrow & Co.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Cheating among business students: A challenge for business leaders and educators. Journal of Management Education, 19, 205–218.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and Contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus examination. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–397.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467.
Oduwaiye, R. O. (2005). Students’ perception of factors and solutions to examination malpractices in Nigerian universities: A case study of the University of Ilorin. Ilorin Journal of Education, 24, 146–148.
Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.
Sahin, T. Y. (2003). Student teachers’ perceptions of instructional technology: Developing materials based on a constructivist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 67–74.
Sims, R. R. (2004). Business ethics teaching: Using conversational learning to build an effective classroom environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 201–211.
Soto, J. G., Anand, S., & McGee, E. (2004). Plagiarism Avoidance: An empirical study examining teaching strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 42–48.
Stanovich, K. (2010). How to think straight about psychology. Boston: Pearson/Allyn Bacon.
Staub, F., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 144–155.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures ad techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2009). Faculty and peer influences on academic integrity: College cheating in Romania. Higher Education, 57(3), 267–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baetz, M., Zivcakova, L., Wood, E. et al. Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts. J Acad Ethics 9, 217–234 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4